I've got a short backhaul (.1 mile) PtMP and it definitely works better with
AirMax on. I forget if I'm using the no-ack feature.
Greg
On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
Ok, so WDS fixed the
Better not be. It makes the link perform like crap.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a short backhaul (.1 mile) PtMP and it definitely works better
You are correct, I have it off. I just checked.
Greg
On Jul 26, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Better not be. It makes the link perform like crap.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:35
I hate to counter..
All of my links are with Airmax on.. including short ones, and they
perform better with Airmax than without.
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net
I am referring to the no-ack feature of AirMax. I, too, have Airmax on all
my links.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:
I hate to counter..
All of my links
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
Tried again and this time airmax off seems to have done the trick. Is there
any suggested settings in Advanced tab for a 2km link?
Turning auto-ACK off and setting it to 3km is probably a good thing.
We are working on deploying a pair of M5 dishes on our network bridging
point a and point b. When we plug in the network to the dishes, the
ping times climb to 1200+ms on side b of the bridge, and equipment local
to the side b of the bridge, and time out after two or more hops,
essentially
Isn't -53 a little too hot?
Are you using WDS? I don't know if AirMax has changed this but I know one used
to need to run with WDS on for a purely transparent bridge.
Greg
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
We are working on deploying a pair of M5 dishes on our network
by a
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
illegal.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:40 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
Isn't -53
It is routed, using miktrotik routers. Do I use WDS with airmax? I don't think
it is a loop because the other bridges are basically doing the same thing but
not seeing the same problem. They are Trango link 45's
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
Always do WDS for backhauls.
On Jul 25, 2011 1:31 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr pni...@cnetworksolutions.com
wrote:
It is routed, using miktrotik routers. Do I use WDS with airmax? I don't
think it is a loop because the other bridges are basically doing the same
thing but not seeing the same problem.
: Monday, July 25, 2011 12:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: fai...@snappydsl.net
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
Always do WDS for backhauls.
On Jul 25, 2011 1:31 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
It is routed, using miktrotik routers. Do I use WDS
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
The reason I ask is because we are using WDS on some M2 PtMP installations to
relay connections to neighbors that are near other customers. A tech from
UBNT told us that WDS is not designed to work with Airmax and it may be causing
some
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
** **
The reason I ask is because we are using WDS on some M2 PtMP installations
to relay connections to neighbors that are near other customers. A tech
from UBNT told us that WDS is not designed to work with Airmax
Yes, in the UBIQUITY World, if you want a transparent bridge... use
WDS (so ... wds always !).
and YES, turn on AIRMAX...
(Airmax is proprietary to Ubiquity, so two UBNT radios are much happier
with Airmax on, plus with Airmax is not 'compatible' with standards
802.11a/b/g/n so other
Ok, so WDS fixed the latency. At 20mhz channel and 100%ccq what should our
actual throughput be. We are only seeing 20mbps max.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
Yes, in the UBIQUITY World, if you want a transparent bridge... use
How are you testing ?
via Radios or via the Mikrotik's behind the radios ?
What is the Recieve test by itself showing and what is the Transmit test
by it'self showing.
also double check to make sure that the MT's and the Radios have
ethernet handshake correct.
You may have to ssh into the
Faisal, call me at 2603074000 this ebening
Rick
Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
How are you testing ?
via Radios or via the Mikrotik's behind the radios ?
What is the Recieve test by itself showing and what is the Transmit test
by it'self showing.
also double check to make sure
This is testing with pc on either end of the radio, plugged in 100fdx ethernet
with iperf. Didn't check ota built-in speedtest. No other traffic on radio.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
How are you testing ?
via Radios or via the
Did you do multiple/single UDP/TCP streams? Usually you want to do two or
three to get close to full capacity.
On a 10 Mhz channel I am getting 40 mbps with little noise on 3 foot dishes
at 15 miles.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
Ok, so WDS fixed the latency. At 20mhz channel and 100%ccq what should our
actual throughput be. We are only seeing 20mbps max.
Airmax should be used on P2P only for high-distance (~50km or more)
links.
is unauthorized and may be illegal.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 8:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Patrick D
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
I tried airmax off but the link is almost unusable. Is there any advanced
settings I need to change?
The other scenario where Airmax makes better goodput is interference,
either from your tower or from
the
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 9:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
On Mon, Jul
Low 50s is about where you want to be for a link. Now the 40s is a bit much.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/25/2011 11:40 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
Isn't -53 a little too hot?
Are you using WDS? I don't know if AirMax has changed this but I know
Mine at max modulation is 51 if that helps.
On Jul 25, 2011 11:48 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
Low 50s is about where you want to be for a link. Now the 40s is a bit
much.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/25/2011 11:40 AM,
26 matches
Mail list logo
