for lack of quality and your money is
leaving town. Rural America doesn't like.
Ross
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] $20 'naked' DSL
Nice words from AT&T but...
I'm in Los Angeles County only 1/2 mile from the city/country line. AT&T
doesn't offer DSL here - apparently they don't think there are enough
customers to justify the cost of upgrading their network. Will AT&T be
required to offer DSL here? It sounds like they will
Taxes, fees, and recovery surcharges are extra.
Modem is free.
Early term is extra.
They didn't mention if you had to have a Cingular account.
George Rogato wrote:
AT&T is required to offer naked DSL for $19.95 in markets that are at
least 80 percent upgraded for broadband. That describes many
I know it's not the answer your looking for, but I am in a market served
by cable and dsl all at just as fast rates and just about the same
pricing or less.
My advantage is the personalized service.
When was the last time the owner of ATT went to the home of a customer
and gave them support.
Almost makes you want to close the doors on the rural market and let the
FCC/Gov fund/force ATT or whoever to provide service in these underserved
areas.
It is going to get to the point where we are only going to be able to
compete in areas where DSL/Cable is not available. I am not sure about t
AT&T is required to offer naked DSL for $19.95 in markets that are at
least 80 percent upgraded for broadband. That describes many of AT&T's
biggest markets, says Kimmelman, who helped negotiate the settlement.
Under the deal, AT&T's cheap DSL products will clock in at 768 kilobits
per second.
