RE: Offline/Spare Gear Inventory Size

We’re a much smaller campus, but we keep a handful of the oldest models in stock as spares – in the range of 4-5 APs. These serve a couple of purposes: · Temporary expansion of coverage for occasional events; we have locations where we may additional capacity 1 or 2 times a year. ·

RE: Offline/Spare Gear Inventory Size

We are a smaller campus, and have experienced a very low failure rate, but still try to keep at least one spare of each type of AP that is currently installed on campus. Bruce Entwistle Network Manager University of Redlands From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv

RE: Offline/Spare Gear Inventory Size

We are an Aerohive shop. We keep a set of current models for deployment that serves as spare stock. With that said, based on the average turnaround time for RMA units, we’ve probably only had as many as 2 of a given model in use as a replacement for a failed unit at the same time once or

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Offline/Spare Gear Inventory Size

We are on Aruba and keep very little in planned, offline inventory. Most APs have a lifetime warranty and we don’t seem many storm related failures. Much like Chuck, our normal deployment stocks can provide spares when needed. We will then send any defective units back to Aruba for warranty

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Offline/Spare Gear Inventory Size

We don’t keep a percentage. We’ve got 13,000 APs, and we replace a handful each month. We make sure we’ve got a suitable replacement or substitute for all production gear, but we don’t necessarily keep a dedicated repair stock. The normal quantity that flows in and out of our shop is usually

Offline/Spare Gear Inventory Size

Hi All, I’m curious to know the size of your spare gear inventories. Do you keep a percentage of each model of AP in inventory, and what is your reasoning? Storms? Last minute/emergency wireless coverage needs? What percentage of your live gear do you keep as offline inventory? (100 live APs

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] PEAP vs TLS

Thanks Bruce. David On Feb 26, 2018, at 8:31 AM, Curtis, Bruce > wrote: On Feb 23, 2018, at 10:58 AM, David Morton > wrote: We currently use EAP-PEAP for our eduroam/802.1x, but are now considering

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] PEAP vs TLS

> On Feb 23, 2018, at 10:58 AM, David Morton wrote: > > We currently use EAP-PEAP for our eduroam/802.1x, but are now considering > adding EAP-TLS to the mix. We have several potential PKIs that we could use, > but all of them will take some work to get them ready for a

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Bandwidth/Throughput/Latency Tester

We also have an instance of the Ookla speedtest at the University of Washington. One thing I notices is for clients on private IP space, the speedtest shows a NATed IP, even though the server is on campus. This is because not everything is local. Anyway, having someone send me a screenshot

RE: Bandwidth/Throughput/Latency Tester

That is what we use. http://speedtest.liberty.edu Bruce Osborne Senior Network Engineer Network Operations - Wireless (434) 592-4229 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Training Champions for Christ since 1971 From: Adam Forsyth [mailto:forsy...@luther.edu] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 9:53 AM Subject: Re: