We had the same problem here. Via WCS I upgraded all the WiSM and disabled
fallback and then issued a reboot all and reloaded all the WLC at once. We
had a one WLC that did not reboot but that was an easy fix.
Douglas Bentley | University IT/NC Network Engineering
University of Rochester |
We also disabled 1 and 2 Mbps almost two years ago. No complaints as of
yet. 5.5 is still on.
-Doug
Douglas Bentley | University IT/NC Network Engineering
University of Rochester | 727 Elmwood Ave.| Rochester, NY 14620
T: 585.275.6550 | Email: douglas.bent...@rochester.edu
What is everyone doing around IP space? We are currently using public
IP space (close to 5000). We were using Nat but that didn't work
because of all the identification and tracking issue. We are using
Cisco as our wireless solution here.
-Doug
Douglas Bentley | University
I completely agree with the 4.2.176 statement. We are having the same
issue with the memory leak on our 14 controllers. After a month of
testing, we are upgrading to 4.2.205 at 5am tomorrow.
-Doug
Douglas Bentley | University IT/NC Network Engineering
University of Rochester |
Hospital
Columbia University Medical Center
(o): 212-305-9021
(m): 917-626-9485
b...@nyp.org
630 W. 168th Street
PH18-126
NY, NY 10032
On Jun 30, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Bentley, Douglas wrote:
I completely agree with the 4.2.176 statement. We are having the
same issue with the memory leak
?
On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Bentley, Douglas wrote:
CSCsq87549/CSCsq63106(memory leaks) Sorry that is the issue within
4.2.130
CSCsx07878-Client devices no longer intermittently fail to log into
a WLAN with web authentication (webauth). This one broke us in
4.2.176. We are using
We moved to the 4.1.176 code from 4.2.130 and had some issue with the
internal Web authentication pages. If this is something, you plan on
doing this bug exists up through the 5.2 code. We downgraded back to
the 4.2.130 code.
We have 2 6509E and 6 WiSMs supporting 3000+ connection daily.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Bentley,
Douglas
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 11:21 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Stable version of Cisco
We are having that exact issue here. We are getting all sort of
duplicate IP address issue on our wireless since student return after
the Christmas break. We are working with Cisco and Microsoft to help
resolve the issue. We have been looking at Wireshark traces and DHCP
logs until our eyes
to 4.2.130.0
-
Leo Song, Cluster Lead - Networking and Security
(519) 824-4120 x 53181 CCS, University of Guelph
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 09:11 -0500, Bentley, Douglas wrote:
Leo,
We are running (8 WiSMs) 4.2.130 with GREAT improvement over 4.1.185 (Crashing
all the time for us too). We
Are you referring to an intermediate Certificate vs. a root? VeriSign only
offers intermediate certificate that the WLCs before 5.1 code will not use
properly. It is an issue with understanding the chaining from what Cisco tells
us. We ended up going through Entrust to get a 2 Year root and
Now that was funny!
This email is being sent from my mobile device.
-Original Message-
From: Lee H Badman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:49 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 1252 LWAPP
We are seeing the same thing here. If anyone finds anything please post
it.
Douglas R. Bentley
University Information Technology
Systems Engineering Group
727 Elmwood Avenue, Suite 132
Rochester, NY 14620
Office: (585) 275-6550
Fax:(585) 273-1013
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bentley,
Douglas
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:57 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN
We are running 4.2.130 as suggested by Cisco. It is very stable so far for us.
-Doug
University of Rochester NY
This email is being sent from my mobile device.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Coloccia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 7:41 AM
To:
We also let our Cisco WiSM select to best channels but we do limit it to
channels 1,6,11.
-Doug
Douglas R. Bentley
University Information Technology
Systems Engineering Group
727 Elmwood Avenue, Suite 132
Rochester, NY 14620
Office: (585) 275-6550
Fax:(585) 273-1013
We were just going through the same issue. We were able to find a work
around that will work for us. We are running Cisco lwapp code 4.2.130.
-Doug
Douglas R. Bentley
University Information Technology
Systems Engineering Group
I have seen this on our WiSMs as well. It seemed to only happen when
APs were overloaded. We added additional access points to the area and
the issue cleared itself.
-Doug
Douglas R. Bentley
University Information Technology
Systems Engineering Group
University of Rochester
727 Elmwood
18 matches
Mail list logo
