Perhaps it's because it's Friday, but just getting PI 1.2.0.103 up
running and I see that when within the GENERAL dashboard,
I cannot scroll all the way to the right to see the edge of the dashlets on
that side.
I thought it might be quickest to just ask this group.
Anyone else seeing
...@uiowa.edumailto:neil-john...@uiowa.edu
From: Garry Peirce pei...@maine.edumailto:pei...@maine.edu
Reply-To: pei...@maine.edumailto:pei...@maine.edu
pei...@maine.edumailto:pei...@maine.edu
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:15 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-
l
Hearing that some do not use FB that wish to sign, perhaps moving it to a
site like http://www.change.org/ http://www.change.org is a possibility,
or perhaps a page could be hosted on the Educause website itself?
The petition's main statement reads:
We the undersigned academic and research
I’m in support of the collective request to help enable further operational
flexibility, although also not sure Apple will feel enough pressure to assist.
To the first item: ‘That Apple establish a way for Apple TV's (and other
Bonjour/Airplay enabled devices) be accessible across multiple
I apologize for duplicate posting, but it was suggested I rename the subject of
my note below so that it fall under this related subject thread.
Re: Cisco vlan select method – I note to be discovered by clients, “This means
the Apple TV should be forced to announce itself by being put to
I am currently not a fan of using ZeroConf service discovery (SD) protocols
but I see two issues here.
1) multicast service across 802.11 infrastructure
2) ZeroConf-SD.
Granted there are inherent obstacles for mcast over wireless, but I feel we
first need better mcast
,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 1/31/2012 8:44 PM, Garry Peirce wrote:
We have ~1400 (1240s-3502's) running 7.0.116 and have no such issues.
I would guess at packet loss as well - some things you might look at:
Are the trunks
Dale beat me to it, as I was thinking of the exact same thing.
With perhaps the downside being adding support complexity should it have an
issue.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dale
We have ~1400 (1240s-3502's) running 7.0.116 and have no such issues.
I would guess at packet loss as well - some things you might look at:
Are the trunks carrying user/AP traffic seem congested when the APs drop?
Have you verified there are no duplex issues? It may exhibit itself more as
traffic
2 cents from someone in a similar boat.
Unfortunately, some of our campuses have been unable to support ubiquitous
wireless in dorms due to cost.
In some cases they have only common areas covered.
That being the case , with wireless being the preferred access method along
with a lack of
Had been running 7.0.98 for a year+, just recently migrated all controllers
(13 w/~1.3K APs) to 7.0.116 - so far so good.
Afterwards I'd heard that multiple Lion clients that had been having
connectivity issues (while under 7.0.98) saw the problem vanish, but that's
all suspect without
I'd agree that the protocol should be 'fixed' here and not re-design the
underlying network to support a particular service.
(note that other service discovery protocols have the same issue - SSDP,
WS-Discovery)
To that end, I was curious if anyone had tried/is using DNS-SD (unicast) to
support
I'm curious what info led you to see Cisco as lagging behind in this area?
Although there may be differences within enterprise class wireless vendor's
current hardware/feature sets, I think the success of a dense-client setup
shifts an emphasis onto the constraints of the local environment and
It's a tricky answer as I think every dense client situation is unique.
From the start, if your client base supports it, using 802.11a will make it
easier given more channels to make use of.
500 clients also includes 500 potential problems for everyone else.
Although a special event, we do so
There are both iperf and NDT mobile apps for android.
NDT app would be nicer if one could define which NDT server to go against ,
so one could go against a local server.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of
Hi Tom,
As we are a public institution, we feel it's desirable to provide a level of
public network access.
We have been trialing such an (unfunded) service for while now using
existing equipment/resources.
A Cisco shop, campus controllers have the open SSID tied to a mobility
tunnel
Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Garry Peirce
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:06 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Hacking Cisco WLC - macfilters
Mike,
I manage Cisco controller exclusions via SNMP.
We have
Mike,
I manage Cisco controller exclusions via SNMP.
We have a homegrown IPAM system which includes a checkbox to be able to
disable a machine.
Doing so for a wireless host causes this to create an exclusion entry which
is then distributed system-wide preventing the host from associating.
You might open a TAC case as all scenarios are different, perhaps especially
when it comes to RRM.
But as your issue sounds similar to one I had when upgrading my controllers
this past October, you might check your DCA sensitivity.
The threshold for channel changes was lowered at one point making
and scans again, it will insert
the 2.4G information it finds back into the prefs file.
If you want the Macs to stick with 5G, then you'll need to create a
different SSID from the 2.4G e.g. main-a, main-g so that it will always
be on 5G.
Jeff
Garry Peirce pei...@maine.edu 11/2/2009 8
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Garry Peirce
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:11 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Self-assigned IP on Macs
Perhaps I was erroneous
Perhaps I was erroneous in equating the two through a Cisco doc referencing
DTPC to world-mode.
'When you enable Dynamic Transmit Power Control (DTPC), access points add
channel and transmit power information to beacons. (On access points that
run Cisco IOS software, this feature is called world
Might you have proxy-dhcp enabled (is by default) on the controllers?
I ran into bug CSCsx96815 when I went to 5.2.157 in the past which caused
clients to not receive an address (the virtual address was corrupted through
an upgrade).
--
Garry Peirce +1-207-561-3539
Network Analyst, ITS
More germane to the subject, I meant to add that we began to upgrade to
6.0.182 since released without issue. I've a handful of APs using HREAP on
these controllers (traffic is locally switched) as well.
--
Garry Peirce
Network Analyst, ITS
University of Maine System
-Original Message
24 matches
Mail list logo
