Hey Michael,
We here at UBC use their product with great success. It has been the
driving force behind our push to get everyone to switch over to 802.1x.
The time it has saved at the tier 1 level, has more than paid for
itself. Been running it for a few years. It's interface is highly
Kristina,
Also be aware of the fact that to mount on a single gang electrical box,
you will likely need another adapter plate (or access to a drill press
if you want to roll your own). The 1142 brackets no longer have the X-Y
holes that the 1131 brackets had, which made the 1131's so nice and
Folks,
We have received this e-mail from our help desk this morning who is
reporting an interesting trend. Before I go spend a lot of time working
with vendors on this, I wanted to see if anyone else has seen similar
behavior. The chipset is the RealTek RTL8192E.
See the e-mail from our
Hey all,
Very much the same case at UBC.
We have 30 minute DHCP timers (so 15 minute requests) active on 12x
/21's...
Without it we would be hosed. We'd like to go lower, but the load on the
controllers (DHCP proxy) and the DHCP server (old SPARC) would likely
become a problem.
Thanks,
Ian
UBC upgraded our campus (39 controllers consisting of 4402's 4404's WiSM's and
5508's) on July 18th to 6.0.182.
-We had some AP's with Static IP's that needed attention.
-We also noticed that the wired ACL in 6.0x doesn't work - we noticed this even
during our 6.0 beta test.
-AP's that were
Hey all,
Been lurking on the form here for a long time, and haven't posted
anything, but we have a real interesting issue, which Cisco TAC can't
seem to wrap their head around yet... Just wondering if anyone else has
encountered similar behavior:
We have a small MESH network on campus (about 10
past the obvious for a more serious issue.
Rick
Procyk, Ian wrote:
Hey all,
Been lurking on the form here for a long time, and haven't posted
anything, but we have a real interesting issue, which Cisco TAC can't
seem to wrap their head around yet... Just wondering if anyone else
has
