We do the same thing for the most part.
Heath
On 7/2/2010 8:09 AM, Daniel Eklund wrote:
We provide free guest access, but not open access. Guests must be
vouched for by a faculty or staff member and that person takes
responsibility for the actions of the guest while they use the
network.
Hello,
Mcgill University here in Montreal has a similar policy,
http://knowledgebase.mcgill.ca/display/2/articleDirect/index.asp?aid=2264r=0.5351679
https://search.mcgill.ca/fasttrack/?appl=guest
We would like to have similar solution but we do not want to develop the
application our
We're using the Cisco Guest NAC Server to provide sponsored guest access
and it's worked fine for us. It ships as an appliance.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10160/index.html
Dave
On 7/6/10 3:48 PM, Christian Heroux wrote:
Hello,
Mcgill University here in Montreal has a
Under cli
Add the following to your user-role for captive portal
max-sessions 50
Using the web you can select the user-role for your captive portal
Look for Max Sessions tab and set to 50
Remember you may need to tweak this a bit depending on your particular page.
Steveh
From: The EDUCAUSE
Hello,
We have a project that would require every student to have a laptop. That would
change the requirements in most classroom and we are looking at how to provide
network access in those room. Wireless seem cheaper than wired to connect to
the network.
For the moment, we recommend
Here at Utah Valley University I would estimate 95% of student network
access is through the wireless network. While we do have some open
ports students can connect to in the library and other areas around
campus we find that very few plug in. While they may get slightly
better performance over
What are your thoughts on placing Wireless traffic in a dedicated VRF
per department or college, etc (in the case of MPLS-based campus
architecture) vs placing the Wireless traffic within the department's or
college's data vlan/vrf? I prefer the dedicated VRF solution because it
provides
