Correct.
-Neil
--
Neil Johnson
Network Engineer
The University of Iowa
Phone: +1 319 384-0938tel:+13193840938
Fax: +1 319 335-2951tel:+13193352951
E-Mail: neil-john...@uiowa.edumailto:neil-john...@uiowa.edu
Lync: neil-john...@uiowa.edusip:neil-john...@uiowa.edu
From: Tim Cappalli
Just wondering what people's thoughts are here regarding using the Web Portal
authentication vs 802.1x auth in your wifi networks. Obviously one big pro
for 802.1x is dynamic vlan assignment based on the users's credentials, but
certainly for web-portal the big pro is simplicity for the user.
Portal net is unencrypted, or encrypted?
-Lee Badman
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ashfield, Matt (NBCC)
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 3:29 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
One major consideration is that the use of https for more and more webpages is
resulting in more confused users not getting redirected to captive portal login
pages. There is also the more obvious issue that client data is not encrypted
over the air, although you could argue that more and more
Can anyone name an application that does not have strong encryption?
I'm not arguing against 802.1x, because it works very well for us as users
don't have to authenticate constantly on a portal, and we seem to do a very
good job getting them on initially, but I am having a hard time
On 11/19/2013 4:05 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
Can anyone name an application that does not have strong encryption?
I'm not arguing against 802.1x, because it works very well for us as users
don't have to authenticate constantly on a portal, and we seem to do a very
good job getting them
I've been very surprised to find applications on campus that don't encrypt
data. We've found recently even in credit card processing devices that were
not properly configured, and sent information in the clear. Given the vast
amount of applications out there, and the absolute zero control
On Nov 19, 2013, at 15:05 , Peter P Morrissey ppmor...@syr.edu
wrote:
Can anyone name an application that does not have strong encryption?
Does not have strong encryption != Strong encryption is in use by default
DNS springs to mind.
Heck, just leave tcpdump running when you wake a
On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Peter P Morrissey ppmor...@syr.edu wrote:
Can anyone name an application that does not have strong encryption?
Search engines such as Google and Bing only encrypt data if you log into the
service.
Even when logged into YouTube the video stream does not appear
from the top of my head...
###What's bad for the user:
-Captive portal: no encryption over the air, pesky re-authentication and
timeouts, no authentication of the infrastructure
(yes, when you accept that SSL Cert from RADIUS you actually authenticate the
infrastructure)
-802.1X: finicky
Curious if others have enabled 802.11k and if doing so has resulted in any client connectivity issues for clients that do not support it. Also, for the Cisco shops, the same question for "non-802.11k assisted roaming"ie"config wlan assisted-roaming prediction {enable | disable} wlan-id"Mike
We use 802.1x to do machine auth on equipment that we own and that is in
the domain. We use Group Policy to push all of the settings. We have auth
type set to 'user or computer' once the user logs on it flips to user
auth. Its really cool because NAC will give the computer a 'Computer'
policy
List seems to sum it up pretty well.
I think user wise dot1x is better ... once setup. So while it may be more
of a pain to configure for some users, once configured the experience is much
better as they walk on to campus and are connected.
Having a captive portal is probably a good
13 matches
Mail list logo
