Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Autonomous APs

You are correct, the same autonomous image used for site survey is a fully blown autonomous implementation for standalone mode, point to point, point to multipoint, repeater, or spectrum mode. Not *just* site survey. -Sam On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Hector J Rios wrote: >

Cisco Autonomous APs

There was a time when certain lightweight APs could be converted to autonomous mode, but would be limited to survey mode. I see the latest IOS release is 15.3(3)JD. I would like to convert a Cisco 3500 series AP to autonomous. Do you know if this software release provides for a full-blown

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Parking garage wireless coverage

The garage will be underground when built so not sure if temperature will be a great issue, but plan to use outdoor AP’s anyway. Doing the survey before is always tough since construction doesn’t allow for us nonunion workers access into the building to do any “work”. So I’ve always had to do

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows loosing gateway connection on 5520 with 3800's

We have a TAC open on this issue that have made little progress on this mostly due to my part. I’ve put the pause button on troubleshooting to a certain degree with the semester startup. I’ve not been able to devote time to this issue. As a workaround TAC has suggested and I’ve found to be

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows loosing gateway connection on 5520 with 3800's

If you're using: 802.1x AES WPA2 authentication Do you have a key caching mechanism enabled (such as CCKM or FT)? -Sam On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Legge, Jeffry wrote: > > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: >

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Parking garage wireless coverage

This is also a good place to mesh. You don’t need high density, just coverage. So even mesh a few hops deep will provide plenty for the few people that will use it at a time. GT From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of

RE: Parking garage wireless coverage

Hi We did that a few years back and the biggest challenges I saw were power and cabling range. We get really cold weather so for me it was vital to have outdoor-rated APs/antennas. NEMA enclosures and humidity are typical in this type of environment too so had to be considered. Like GT and

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Parking garage wireless coverage

I agree with Fred. You won’t need nearly as many as you would assume. My “house” is made of solid concrete and steel and the amount of multi path coverage you will get is amazing. I recommend an AP-on-a-stick type survey before ordering a bunch of APs. GT From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows loosing gateway connection on 5520 with 3800's

Do you have other WAPs to test against i.e. is it specific to the 3802’s or does it happen on older models too? Is this happening when the Win 10 machine roams to another WAP, or does it happen when stationary and anchored to one WAP? Is this an open WLAN or is authentication involved? Are the

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Parking garage wireless coverage

We did this using Aruba 275 APs. We actually got away with using a lot less then we initially anticipated. They are High-Pot so you will need appropriate an POE source. On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Becker, Jason wrote: > Has anyone installed wireless in their underground

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows loosing gateway connection on 5520 with 3800's

Checking to see if you can ping the VIP of the WLC will let you know if's an RF issue (likely) or something between the AP and the WLC (unlikely). If it's an 'in air' issue, it could be anything from changing channels, interference, radio resets, or just plain old Windows being dumb about life

AVC on Cisco WLCs

Hello everyone, For those running AVC on Cisco WLCs, could you please share your experience with it? Are you using different AVC profiles for wlans, doing any remarks and drops? Are you using Netflow? We are primarily a Cisco shop with multiple 8510 wlcs, now exploring to enable AVC on our

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows loosing gateway connection on 5520 with 3800's

Have not been able to get debugs cause I was made aware of the problem after the fact. I am on version 8.2.121.0. It seems to be on Windows 10 boxes mostly but I have seen it on Windows 8.1. It’s not real often now but students to arrive until tomorrow. From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco interface groups

We have used interface groups since the initial installation of our 5508 controllers and they have worked well. One issue we did have was an older application required clients to be on the same subnet and would fail when clients were distributed across the VLANs in the interface group. Bruce

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows loosing gateway connection on 5520 with 3800's

What version of code are you using? Can you ping the virtual IP of the WLC (192.0.2.1, or whatever it's set to)? How reproducible/common is it? Can you get a client debug off of the WLC at the time of failure? -Sam On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Legge, Jeffry wrote: > I

Windows loosing gateway connection on 5520 with 3800's

I am seeing Windows 10 clients lose their connection to gateway. I have a new 5520 controller with 3802's. The cisco Anyconnect gets error message saying it cannot reach policy manager. I ping the gateway and DNS server but do not get a response. Is anyone experiencing this problem? **

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco interface groups

Interface groups are one of those very unassuming features that 'just works'. The WLC treats all interfaces (regular interfaces or groups) the same and all you need to modify on your aaa return attribute is the name of the group instead of the name of the VLAN. In fact, if you're currently

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco interface groups

Purdue is an all-Cisco shop and we've been using interface groups for a few years now. We use them our main 1x SSID and also with AAA override on eduroam to put Purdue users into the same set of VLANs as the 1x SSID (consistent access experience). It's worked very well so far. As Timothy said:

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco interface groups

I started using them minimally(only 3 interfaces to the group) here when we implemented eduroam on our campus. So far I haven't seen any issues. My plan is to start using them more. Currently, we separate our subnets per building, so my thought is to begin combining them into groups in hopes to

Cisco interface groups

Hi. For those using interface groups on Cisco WLC, could you share any experiences good or bad that you have had? We are exploring the use of aaa override and return the interface group name rather than vlan. Thanks Jimmy James Helzerman Wireless Network Engineer University of Michigan