I knew someone was going to go there Lee. :-)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:23 AM Lee H Badman <
00db5b77bd95-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
> Perhaps his name is Channel McFly, and he’s looking to raise a Ruckus.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group
If you value him / her as a person you won't reveal their name. Except to
me. I really want to know.
:-)
GT
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:21 AM Dan Lauing wrote:
> I have never heard of that before. That is extremely interesting.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:18 AM SWARTZ, POLA
> wrote:
>
>>
>From what I understand it will keep the same MAC longer if it passing
traffic at that 24 hour mark.
GT Hill
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:44 PM Rios, Hector J <
hector.r...@austin.utexas.edu> wrote:
> I’ve done several tests on an iPhone 7 and there have been instances where
> th
You can employ what I call "psychological band steering".
X University Fast
X University (normal, slow, legacy, old etc.)
Something like that.
A friend of mine runs the Wi-Fi network for a VERY large retailer and they
are 5 GHz only on their primary SSID. Jake makes a good point for sure if
You can get stranded Ethernet cable that will handle more movement. 5
floors isn’t nearly at the limit of Cat5 so that isn’t a concern.
Another option is to do an AP at the top of the shaft with a static mesh in
the car. No wires. Nice and easy.
GT
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:55 PM John Turner
; I second GT Hill, but you really need Ekahau to be effective. It’s not
> cheap- but down/spotty/unreliable networks aren’t either.
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> *On Behalf Of *GT Hill
> *Sent:*
isn't an issue.
I'm happy to answer any other questions. Thanks!
GT Hill
CWNE #21
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:37 AM Sidharth Nandury
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We have historically depended on vendors to do wireless surveys for us,
> and any signal related issues have been tackled with sig
Eric,
I’ve never heard of a consumer device deauthing STAs that aren’t associated to
themselves. If you happen to get a packet capture I know some people that would
be interested in looking at it.
The only case of malicious deauths I’ve seen was from an enterprise vendor IPS.
GT
On
at this
time, but again, the data indicates that there is client improvement.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
on behalf of GT Hill <g...@gthill.com>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIREL
This is very anecdotal, but I have personally seen a large university go from
20/40 to all 20 MHz and it have a 30% improvement in end user performance.
Everyone’s mileage will vary but given the data I’ve seen no way would I run 80
MHz channels except in VERY limited scenarios.
If I were
Just to clarify, are you wanting to use DAS for cellular AND Wi-Fi? Thanks!
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of Lorenzo Costantino
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Are you looking for a complete solution or a less expensive DIY?
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of James Helzerman
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
an@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
on behalf of GT Hill <g...@gthill.com>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 11:52 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.
”, the
satisfaction for this question may trend down.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
on behalf of GT Hill <g...@gthill.com>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELE
an@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
on behalf of GT Hill <g...@gthill.com>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 8:47 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educa
degraded performance
Just some thoughts. :-)
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of GT Hill <g...@gthill.com>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDU
I know that this is just one example, but I was at a large university site
(Cisco Wi-Fi) that was running 20/40 channelization. After a switch to 20 MHz
only, there was a 35% improvement in end-user Wi-Fi experience.
Jake – One feature that I think many people agree is missing in FRA is the
I’m sure I’m probably going against the grain here, but if I had to choose, I’d
buy used 11n APs from an enterprise manufacturer before I’d go 11ac from a
“cheaper” manufacturer. Number one, virtually any environment you have will be
served just fine with 11n.
And to further make my point,
Maybe reach out to Ruckus. They sell a lot into hospitality and can get very
aggressive with pricing for what you are looking to do. Tell them I sent you
(used to work there).
And then what will likely happen is that Aruba or Cisco will hate that you and
then try to beat them on pricing. :-)
Frank,
Maybe you just have certain channels assigned for the students to use? Make an
AP group of just the APs around the room and exclude certain channels that are
designated for educational use?
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
I have seen real data where changing from 20/40 to 20 MHz only improved network
congestion by 30+%. I would say based on data that I see, a default config of
20 MHz channelization is a good best practice with 40 MHz done strategically if
necessary. Just my $.02.
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE
Just curious, do you have DFS enabled?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of "Jeffrey D. Sessler"
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
rv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of GT Hill
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 11:26 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Disabling LEDs on APs
Here’s an AWESOME idea (if I do say so myself). Vendors could put an infrared
status light in their AP
Here’s an AWESOME idea (if I do say so myself). Vendors could put an infrared
status light in their APs. Of course not visible to the naked eye BUT, if you
get an older phone etc, it will see IR lights (many newer phones have IR
filters). Point your phone camera to the IR source and you’ll see
This is also a good place to mesh. You don’t need high density, just coverage.
So even mesh a few hops deep will provide plenty for the few people that will
use it at a time.
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of
I agree with Fred. You won’t need nearly as many as you would assume. My
“house” is made of solid concrete and steel and the amount of multi path
coverage you will get is amazing. I recommend an AP-on-a-stick type survey
before ordering a bunch of APs.
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues
a VERY short time
of each other AND are physically separated enough to get spatial separation AND
have similar RSSI?
Let’s just say, I’m not optimistic. :-)
GT Hill
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Chuck Enfiel
response.
GT Hill
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Philippe Hanset
<phan...@anyroam.net>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Dat
Craig,
Changing the data rate will only affect how YOU interfere with them, but not in
reverse. When an AP (well, any Wi-Fi device) hears a Wi-Fi signal of any data
rate it will defer (not transmit).
I don’t know your Wi-Fi vendor but a trick to try is to reduce your AP receive
sensitivity.
(80 MHz). Coupled with vendor RRM and dynamic
channel-width selection, I’m hard pressed to see where co-channel interference
is going to be an issue in 5GHz except in outliers such as stadium deployments.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@
There is a fine line here. Signal strength best practices can’t be arbitrarily
increased just because 256 QAM requires it. Added signal strength is of course
achieved with either increased Tx power or added access points, both of which
will contribute to increased co-channel interference.
An
31 matches
Mail list logo