SERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
GT,
A better conclusion to draw may be, “Many wireless deployments suffer from
questionable design choices and execution, often leading to less-than-optimal
configuration decisions.” That I can get behind.
In the case of the un
Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
"More channels means more capacity" is not true. Because the number of
null subcarriers is fixed and independent of channel width, wider channels
will make more efficient use
p Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 3:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
>From the Cisco/Apple Design Guide Here: https://goo.gl/5bGWks
"It is therefore n
on behalf of GT Hill <g...@gthill.com>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 11:52 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re:
behalf of "Jeffrey D. Sessler"
<j...@scrippscollege.edu>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 2:08 PM
To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WI
reless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Jeffrey D. Sessler
<j...@scrippscollege.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 1:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
Jake,
GT’s statement doe
n behalf of Jake Snyder <jsnyde...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 11:49 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Su
tserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
Your experience is consistent with ours Jeff. We get good use of 40MHz
channels in most areas. That said, complaints about basic connectivity greatly
outnumber complaints about spe
uot;wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
I know that this is just one example, but I was at a large university site
D. Sessler"
<j...@scrippscollege.edu>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 1:41 PM
To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questio
.com>
> Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 8:47 AM
> To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN
se.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
I know that this is just one example, but I was at a large university site
(Cisco Wi-Fi) that was running 20/40 channelization. After a switch to 20 MHz
only, there was a 35% improvement in end-user W
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:43 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
For your residential, is that concern rooted
on behalf of GT Hill <g...@gthill.com>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, 26 September 2017 at 11:47 pm
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subjec
CAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 10:47 AM
To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
I know that this is just one example, but I was at a large university site
(Cisco Wi-Fi) that was running 20/40 channelization. After
lt;WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 9:39 AM
To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
My challenge, as I’ve stated on this list before, is that Mac OS X preferences
width in its AP selection criteria. S
;WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 7:33 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
While there are performance gains to be sure (by going to 40, or 80), the
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of "Street, Chad A"
> <cstr...@emory.edu>
> Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 6:59 AM
> To: "wireless
rs.™*
>
>
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey D. Sessler
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 20
SS-LAN] Two RF Questions
It’s surprising to me that anyone would purchase a Lamborghini, then disconnect
ten of the twelve cylinders and drive it at 25 mph on the autobahn.
When I see static 20 MHz channels, or using 40 MHz in only limited areas, I
wonder what’s behind the purposeful neu
A" <cstr...@emory.edu>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 6:59 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN
If you’re responding to my comments, I don’t think I said what you think I
said.
From: Street, Chad A [mailto:cstr...@emory.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 9:59 AM
To: Chuck Enfield <chu...@psu.edu>
Cc: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Que
Behalf Of David Blahut
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 3:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
Greetings,
I have two hopefully simple RF related questions:
1. Should I enable the extended UNII-2 channels campus wide?
2. Should I enable 40Mhz c
serv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Entwistle, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:11 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
We have a similar configuration and have begun using the additional channels
but continue to
Of David Blahut
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 12:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
Greetings,
I have two hopefully simple RF related questions:
1. Should I enable the extended UNII-2 channels campus wide?
2. Should I enable 40Mhz channel width
Hi Dave,
I personally would not enable 40+ MHz wide channels without already having the
UNII-2 channels enabled as it will cut down on your available channels.
Also, stay away from any doppler radar frequencies used in Poughkeepsie ;-)
-Eric Kenny
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 3:16 PM, David Blahut
t in some high
> density areas.
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *David Blahut
> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 3:17 PM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* [WIR
September 25, 2017 3:17 PM
>
>
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have two hopefully simple RF related questions:
>
> 1. Should I enable the extended UNII-2 channels campus wide?
>
&g
] On Behalf Of David Blahut
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 3:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
Greetings,
I have two hopefully simple RF related questions:
1. Should I enable the extended UNII-2 channels campus wide?
2. Should I enable 40Mhz
SE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of David Blahut
Sent: 25 septembre 2017 15:17
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
Greetings,
I have two hopefully simple RF related questions:
1
Greetings,
I have two hopefully simple RF related questions:
1. Should I enable the extended UNII-2 channels campus wide?
2. Should I enable 40Mhz channel width campus wide?
In other words what are you doing on your campus and what is the "best
practice?
Our wireless infrastructure:
3 Cisco
31 matches
Mail list logo
