Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

On 1 Aug 2017, at 17:33, Ciesinski, Nick wrote: While WLC 8.5 did add IPSK it is probably safe to say its rather worthless for most at this time. For those who have used ISE if you watch the video on how they make IPSK work it isn’t feasible to give each of your users their own PSK key to

Web GUI unresponsive after HTTPS-redirect enabled

Im running 8.2.160 on 8540, does anyone hit this bug yet? Terrible response from the management GUI. https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvc00271/?referring_site=bugquickviewredir ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I value what Jeff is doing with Beta, but also have to agree with James. Universities might be different- but we’re not THAT different that controllers and APs should crumble after all these years and generations of vendor offerings. I find code updates can be problematic, too many APs dump

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

"The most interesting new device to show up so far as been a Ring Doorbell system. " Never would of thought of that one! I guess knocking is just so 2008. Pete From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Davis

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

One of the things as a partner I try to educate customers on is “who is recommending what, and why.” My experience has been that the BU is trying to drive feature adoption, sell APs and controllers. That’s why they exist, so don’t fault them for it. They tend to recommend new APs, new

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Well said, Jake. Lee Badman | Network Architect Certified Wireless Network Expert (#200) Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e lhbad...@syr.edu w its.syr.edu SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

Hmm. So I wonder how these things would work on a home network which is just about guaranteed to not have a public IP? Pete From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Carlton, Rick Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 10:44

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

In my environment (Cisco, WLC based, wave 2 APs, local mode) I have Nintendo Switches that work just fine behind NAT'd addresses (as an FYI). -Sam On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Peter P Morrissey wrote: > Hmm. So I wonder how these things would work on a home network which

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I think one area where we may have philosophical differences is in how much time a vendor relationship should require. We are a small, hopefully well-trained and experienced team that accomplishes a lot. We try to choose COTS solutions that don’t require a lot of admin overhead. The depth of

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

We made multiple changes for a test device, so not claiming that the public IP was the fix, but one of the modifications. We haven't had any trouble reports until last week (maybe it was a slow summer). We've kicked the ticket over to our Net Sec team to dig into it further. I suspect it is

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

We've gotten a request about wifi enabled wall outlets in residence halls for controlling connected appliances and metering power usage. -Paul Reimer From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter P Morrissey Sent:

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

What challenges have you experienced with the Nintendo Switch? Dot1x support? Thanks, Chris Adams, CISSP Assistant CIO, Network & Telecom Division of Information Technology University of North Georgia E-Mail: chris.ad...@ung.edu | Office: (706) 867-2891 From: The

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

With your beta controller how many access points and concurrent device connections are you able to test? We are setting up a similar scenario, not so much for beta testing as for a stepping stone to upgrades of our campus controllers. The controller pair are 8540s and should have 250-300 APs

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Lee, I can only speak to my experience, and in the case of the x800 series, we were a first-customer-ship and had them in production in Aug 2016. I ran into a few bugs, mostly stuck radios, but with direct engagement with the BU, I was getting code fixes (or viable workarounds) within hours. I

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

One of the more challenging devices so far is the Nintendo Switch. Rick From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Reimer Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 9:19 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re:

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

We currently have an open SSID, so authentication and network access is not the issue. The challenge is around the use of P2P. So far, the only fix/workaround is to give the device a public IP (which we don't currently support) with open internet access (which security won't support). Rick