Yep, we're bonding DSL with MLPPP as well, with direct PVCs through Verizon.
Caveat: we generally see only about 80% performance rates (i.e. if [4] 1Mbps
circuits are bonded together, we get 3.2Mbps throughput). Have not found a
way to improve this. Using Cisco gear on both ends.
-
Anyone know what the purpose of a CDPv1 broadcast is and why do Ubiquiti PS2
and NS2 use them?
Phil
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Discovery_Protocol
-R
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know what the purpose of a CDPv1 broadcast is and why do Ubiquiti PS2
and NS2 use them?
Phil
IIRC mikrotik uses that for its winbox/mac telnet availability broadcasts.
Perhaps ubnt does something similar in AirOS? If you check cdp on a cisco
switch you can discover quite a bit of detail on all the mikrotiks connected
to it.
Randy Cosby
*sent from my tmobile dash*
-Original
If you look on a MikroTik in it's neighbor list you will be able to not only
see other MikroTiks but also Cisco units as well Ubnt units since the Neighbor
viewer solution uses the CDP protocol. Helpful to allow you to discover a
lost units ip etc. Pretty cool under used tool that many are not
Hi,
That's not good news... when we use Cisco CEF and per-packet load
balancing, we get the full speed. We currently have a customer that has
4 bonded 4Mbps DSL lines, and they get 16Mbps any time they run a speed
test.
And, now that I think about it, at one of our very remote POP's, we
have
Ok, now we know what it is and does. Our network currently is primarily
Tranzeo AP's, CPE's and backhaul with Linksys routers behind the CPE's.
Recently a half of dozen Ubnt units have been installed and concurrent with
these installations we have been experiencing ARP table corruption in both
I'm glad this subject has come up! I've got two ATT T1's. At their
request, we run Cisco CEF with per-packet load balancing. I am able to
get 2.8Mbps down but the upload is rarely above 1.5Mbps, sometime
1.8Mbps. I measure this with my laptop plugged directly into our Cisco
7204 VXR router using a
I had 4 T1s balanced using Multi-Link Frame Relay. Supposedly it only
had a 10% overhead vs. MLPPP of almost 20%. I was having strange issues
and not always experiencing my full downloads. The techs always said
they don't see any errors. I finally pushed the issue and they did an
in-depth
Hi,
Maybe if you could post parts of your config file I can compare with
our config file. It almost sounds like you are missing the static
routes out both interfaces (unnumbered). Here is what we have on our
Cisco going to a customer:
ip route 69.20.190.12 255.255.255.252 ATM1/0.551
Supposedly, after my second time calling them, ATT ran in-depth tests.
Maybe three is the charm! We'll see.
I've been meaning to order and replace the WIC card. You're right,
that could be it. Thanks!
-RickG
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Eric Rogers ecrog...@precisionds.com wrote:
I had 4
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 17:23 +0100, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
to be honest mikrotik routing is not working well, and we are far from
being happy about the OSPF implementation: too many bugs and lost routes.
While there are some bugs in SOME versions of Mikrotik's RouterOS
releases, it is far
Hello,
We rolled out MPLS more to get VPLS. While we have plans to really
utilize the MPLS we really need the VPLS for our clients that needed
transport across our network. On another note ATT is pushing MPLS
connections to multiple sites instead of their T1 services in our area.
Even
Soo.what is the most STP switches anyone has had on a single collision domain?
On 1/24/09, Nathan Stooke nstooke...@wisperisp.com wrote:
Hello,
We rolled out MPLS more to get VPLS. While we have plans to really
utilize the MPLS we really need the VPLS for our clients that needed
Hello,
We have 3 on another part of our network, but I know you can do
more. It works really well for our setup. We are using RSTP so we do not
even loose a ping when it changes over.
However, we do not care much for it. It does work in the right
instances, but you have a
Hello,
I just talked to my CTO, he loves MPLS and would never go back. It
solves a ton of issues with routed networks.
Here are some good sites with info, so you can make your own
judgment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiprotocol_Label_Switching
Anyone know who they are and what they make? I saw a MAC id pop up in a
site survey that started with 00:12:CE, which was new to me. When I ran
it through some of the mac lookup databases it was registered by
Advanced Cybernetics Group.
Jason
17 matches
Mail list logo
