http://www.superpass.com/SPD-GSH4T-J6T.html#V_plane
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Dual Band Sectors
Has anyone used any
That is almost exactly what I want... Do they make it polar opposite?
Like 2.4 V and 5.8 H?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:26 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject:
If you call John at superpass he may be willing to build one custom for
you.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual
Are these good antennas that we can compare to MTI, Tiltek, etc or the
generic quality of PacWireless, etc?
I would like to have a 900 hpol and 5.8 vpol if it's a good antenna to
save space!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you
I would also like to know the quality. Good question Josh.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual Band Sectors
Are these
That would be a Trango 5800 series unit.
http://www.trangobroadband.com/wireless-products/multipoint-broadband-access/Access5830-System.aspx
The better question is it an AP or CPE? The only way to tell is to log into
it.
-RickG
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Jayson Baker
Rick, Have you used these? If so, how well do they work? -RickG
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote:
http://www.superpass.com/SPD-GSH4T-J6T.html#V_plane
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
We used some a few years ago for a vWISP on his original tower install.
Over time, he moved to dedicated backhauls in place of the 5.8 portion of
the sectors. I can't remember how well they worked to tell the truth as I
was not intimately involved in any installs off of the 5.8 portion.
Sorry
Rick,
I think he is asking on just the antennas themselves. I do not believe
trango manufactured the antenna element and enclosure. A customer of ours
has a closet full of damaged Trango radios that were well out of warrantee
(not at all bashing trango, static and surge happens.). We have
Right. These aren't/weren't Trango. We bought just the antenna itself, and
put MikroTik inside it.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Mike Goicoechea m...@cielosystems.netwrote:
Rick,
I think he is asking on just the antennas themselves. I do not believe
trango manufactured the antenna
We have tested different types and found with the dual pol Sectors that
Radiowaves makes an excellent antenna. They offer 2.4v and 5.8h or 2.4h and
5.8v. They offer 60 or 90 degree. We have used 3 90s for 360 coverage on a
tower with great results. If you need further information feel free to hit
I just put up a new repeater site today. I am using MT for the
P2P. I aligned the dishes by eyeball and a compass bearing, and
think I'm close. The signal at both ends is -71 dBm, but am
expecting better. I am going to wag one or the other (or both)
dishes, but wondered where to start.
What is the distance of the link? What antennas? What wireless cards?
Travis
Microserv
Mike wrote:
I just put up a new repeater site today. I am using MT for the
P2P. I aligned the dishes by eyeball and a compass bearing, and
think I'm close. The signal at both ends is -71 dBm, but am
Are you passing traffic over the link yet? CCQ numbers are very
inaccurate until traffic is going through. They usually improve.
Mike wrote:
I just put up a new repeater site today. I am using MT for the
P2P. I aligned the dishes by eyeball and a compass bearing, and
think I'm close.
Ignore noise floor/CCQ on Atheros cards. In every place I have tested, the
Atheros card will say -105 to -95 noise floor but the Canopy unit will say
-95 to -83. Never seen a higher noise floor then -95 on an Atheros card.
Is this 2.4 or 5.8? Are you seeing -71 both ways?
Josh Luthman
Office:
That helps. No, it is not passing traffic. I'll generate some. Thanks. Mike
At 12:49 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
Are you passing traffic over the link yet? CCQ numbers are very
inaccurate until traffic is going through. They usually improve.
Mike wrote:
I just put up a new repeater site
10.6 miles. 5.8. I'm looking for a -65 dBm Rx on the link. It's
about 6 dB off. Fresnel zone is clear p2p. Each can see a flashing
beacon on top of the other. What I want to know which one to wag
first, or flip a coin?
Mike
At 12:46 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
What is the distance of the
5.8. Yes, -71 each way. Most 5.8 noise here is P2P, but is low.
Which one shall I wag Josh? I'm thinking the higher side, which is
actually easier to access. If I can tweak without a bucket truck I'll
save some expense.
Mike
At 12:51 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
Ignore noise floor/CCQ on
I had those antennas sourced from a place in China. We couldn't get the
mounting to work right in our situation for MikroTik. I will try to
find the source, but something makes me say Kenbotong?
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
If it's -71 both ways my guess is they're right on. 6db loss is kind of
curious though. Does it fluctuate at all?
What kind of antennas?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains,
If that's the case, I would go ahead and do that one first.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, November
-71 on a 10 Mile link is kind of high for say R52H/23dB antenna...What
type of radios are you using?
We have one 13 miles that is sitting at -57 with R52N/23dB antennas.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
Nice antenna, but it is $1300 list.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Goicoechea
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 1:29 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual Band Sectors
We have tested
But it is exactly what I am looking for... SEC-2V-5H-90 Bummer...
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 2:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual Band Sectors
Trango began life as Sunstream, they changed names way back.
-Kevin
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
The back looks a little different for a Trango but otherwise it looks
identical. I think Sunstream made the antennas for them a long time ago,
While we've never used this particular RadioWaves antenna I do know you get
what you pay for. I would imagine street price for this antenna would be
between $900 - $1000. Considering what some towers charge per antenna the
ROI for this antenna could be pretty quick!
Best,
Brad
Iirc
Those were an European knock off of the trango ap antenna enclosure
Similar to trango but not an exact copy
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Nov 4, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Jayson Baker jay...@spectrasurf.com
wrote:
We have a couple of these, that I think we bought from Titan
10.6 miles. 23dBi antennas at both ends. Low power radio. 17 dB or
lower. I know one end is out; has to be. I just thought the numbers
might be obvious to someone.
Mike
At 01:29 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
-71 on a 10 Mile link is kind of high for say R52H/23dB antenna...What
type of radios
Recently I posted an issue with a new customer that had a great signal
but poor throughput. A lot of people sais multipath. Well now I have
more data and another customer seeing the same thing.
1. If you get connected to an RDP session it stays connected.
2. If you do a constant
/20091104/5e67ba80/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
mikro...@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
with
same result. These are Tranzeo CPQ's as clients and MT
AP/RB532/XR-2/120
16db HPol.
Mark McElvy
AccuBak Data Systems, Inc.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091104
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091104/5e67ba80/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
mikro...@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com
32 matches
Mail list logo
