Re: [WISPA] here it come$

Computer Inquiry Acts = CIA -- Original Message -- From: "Scottie Arnett" Reply-To: sarn...@info-ed.com, WISPA General List Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:34:12 -0600 >EXACTLY! Good old Computer Inquires Acts! Wish they were still valid? and/or >enforced...a

Re: [WISPA] FCC Enforcements

If this radar operates at 5600-5650 why does the FCC now require the DFS on 5300mhz ??? Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jack Unger

Re: [WISPA] FCC Enforcements

They have required it there for several years. It is part of the reason we get to operate there. It is required on 5.4 as well. On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > If this radar operates at 5600-5650 why does the FCC now require the DFS on > 5300mhz ??? > > Kurt Fankhaus

Re: [WISPA] iPhone ssh app

I just got an HTC Hero running Droid 1.6. I'm liking it so far. We'll see how good (or bad) the radio is in it. I'm often on the very fringes of coverage. It's been a bit of a pita to figure out how to use it though. Like how can I take out their silly sig line in the emails that I send???

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

One of these days *someone* is going to find a way to create a network to compete with ESPN and things will get a lot nicer! Fox Sports Northwest, out here, gets watched a LOT more than ESPN these days. marlon - Original Message - From: "jp" To: ; "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, M

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

This is interesting: http://www.seizethepage.com/how-to-watch-espn360-if-it-is-not-provided-through-your-isp/ On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: > One of these days *someone* is going to find a way to create a network to > compete with ESPN and things will get a lot nicer!

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:20 PM, RickG wrote: > Actually, yes, this is the first I've heard about it. Obviously, I'm > not a sports fan :) I was initially surprised you hadn't heard of it before too because you're pretty active on list and it's been discussed numerous times and in detail over the

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

We have a fiber link to ATT. All of our ESPN360 traffic goes across that fiber. It says "provided by ATT" but that's not a big deal to me if it saves me $500-1000/mth. Regards, Chuck Hogg Shelby Broadband 502-722-9292 ch...@shelbybb.com http://www.shelbybb.com -Original Message- From:

[WISPA] Here comes the really BIG WAVE

-- Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993

[WISPA] Protecting Radio Equiment from Coronal Mass Ejections

Sorry for the Scifi thread but we know that this has happened in the past when we had very few birds in the air and were not as dependent on this equipment. Since we are now witnessing the Sun going into a Solar Maximum and some amazing filaments that NASA seems to be concerned about, I have a que

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

Chuck, You're perceptive on the reasons I didnt "hear" of it, I probably just didnt pay attention as it didnt seem to apply or it just got lost in all the topics. As I've mentioned before, I did "pay by the bit" back in '98 when I was GM at a small cable co. I only imposed it on bandwidth hogs an

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

Thats what I figured out here. My proxied traffic going through my TW connection is fine, its just the customers on my public ip's that wont work. So, you're rerouting the ESPN360 traffic? Thats a good workaround! On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > We have a fiber link to ATT.

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

Well, for what it's worth I hope *you* are right and *I* am wrong ;-). Damn I hate betting against the outcome I _want_ to see! Chuck On Mar 13, 2010, at 11:37 AM, RickG wrote: > Chuck, > > You're perceptive on the reasons I didnt "hear" of it, I probably just > didnt pay attention as it didn

Re: [WISPA] FCC Enforcements

That requirement was done several years ago to avoid military radars. Kurt Fankhauser wrote: If this radar operates at 5600-5650 why does the FCC now require the DFS on 5300mhz ??? Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Mess

Re: [WISPA] Protecting Radio Equiment from Coronal Mass Ejections

A CME will/should only affect objects larger than ~20 meters. It may not effect the equipment, and the tower should already be grounded. The only way to preotect the equipment diffrently, would be taking it off of the tower. On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:32 AM, St. Louis Broadband wrote: > Sorry fo

Re: [WISPA] here it come$

LOL, good one. -- Original Message -- From: "Stuart Pierce" Reply-To: Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:50:30 -0500 >Computer Inquiry Acts = CIA > >-- Original Message -- >From: "Scottie Arnett" >Reply-To: sarn...@info-ed

Re: [WISPA] Benchmark

Hi, I am not sure why you keep sending me these type of emails. Having worked with over 50 leasing companies during the last 10 years (over $2,000,000 worth)... I can honestly say Benchmark is the worst company we have ever dealt with. At the beginning of our current lease with you, you took m

Re: [WISPA] Benchmark

They stole $1000 of my money too. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subs