If this was asked earlier in the thread I missed it. On which interfaces should
arp-proxy be enabled? Just on the local net or on the public interface(s) as
well?
Greg
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:38 AM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 22:51 -0400, Francois Menard wrote:
Are you saying
From the DHS morning report
September 21, Milford Daily News - (Massachusetts) Two copper thefts
investigated in Milford. Police are investigating the thefts of copper from
a Pine Street church and a Verizon substation in Milford, Massachusetts,
sometime September 19. The police chief said
Thanks, all. I'll be working it later again..
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:07 AM
To: fai...@snappydsl.net; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
I've got a competitor getting ready to light a nanostation based tower
within 2 miles of one of my Canopy 2.4 towers. What kind of
interference should I expect?
Listening to this guy, their radios are magic and can shoot through
trees and over hills. Totally overcoming line of site issues. Is
I have a company who wants me to come in an attach to their network and do a
IP/system name/user inventory. But they don't want me to have access to their
servers or passwords. Is there an app out there that might do this. I know I
can do an angry IPscan and get IP and machine name. I was
Not radio dependant. Rf is Rf.
If he's shooting through trees it is 900 or 3.65 mimo.
On Sep 22, 2010 12:57 PM, Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a competitor getting ready to light a nanostation based tower
within 2 miles of one of my Canopy 2.4 towers. What kind of
I did spread sheets, moving to powercode.
On Sep 22, 2010 1:00 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
I have a company who wants me to come in an attach to their network and do a
IP/system name/user inventory. But they don't want me to have access to
their servers or passwords. Is there an
I am looking for a Wireless VOIP Phone that my installers could have to use out
at customers. What would be a clincher is if it had the ability to also do
10Mhz Channels so when at a tower they could use it. Some of our towers are
very rural and their cell phones don't work well. Any
SIP app on Android or iPhone?
On 09/22/2010 10:09 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
I am looking for a Wireless VOIP Phone that my installers could have to use
out at customers. What would be a clincher is if it had the ability to also
do 10Mhz Channels so when at a tower they could use it. Some
10mhz will be rough. Maybe an ns2 an voip phone?
One installer used a cisco phone for this. He liked it, made me smile.
On Sep 22, 2010 1:11 PM, Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com wrote:
SIP app on Android or iPhone?
On 09/22/2010 10:09 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
I am looking for a
Yes; he's smoking something strange or someone is feeding him a line of BS.
On 9/22/2010 9:57 AM, Marco Coelho wrote:
I've got a competitor getting ready to light a nanostation based tower
within 2 miles of one of my Canopy 2.4 towers. What kind of
interference should I expect?
Listening
It depends on what kind of information that you have to inventory. If it is
a security issue test on a LAN network fine. Otherwise you
need Administrator or root access to the Box to do the job.
Of course, you can have a lot of information about protocol running on the
Box, just using a port scan
You are all telling me what I thought would be the case. What would be a great
app is a little app you put on a Flash drive and plug it into the pc and it
does a scan and saves the data to a .csv. Nothing loaded tells memory, cpu,
IP, user and whatever.
Oh well since I am the furthest thing
I don't have personal experience with UBNT M2 and Moto Canopy.
However I would suggest that you do a search on UBNT forms for posts by
'WHT' and also on DSLReports WISP Forums.
WHT is one of the Beta Testers for advance features and newer firmware
coming down the pikes.
His testing suggests
Should have read better.
Netscan is another good app.
On Sep 22, 2010 1:33 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
You are all telling me what I thought would be the case. What would be a
great app is a little app you put on a Flash drive and plug it into the pc
and it does a scan and saves
on the interface that has the same IP subnet as the VPN
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
If this was asked earlier in the thread I missed it. On which interfaces
should arp-proxy be enabled? Just on the local net or on the public
interface(s) as well?
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/networking/it-8217s-official-carrier-pigeons-are-faster-than-rural-internet/173?tag=nl.e539
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Pretty impressive for 5.8Ghz. I'm aware of numerous long 2.4G links, but
this is clearly a record for 5.8G.
http://www.gizmag.com/go/7878/
It was even over water, all be it, it was also on top of a mountain a mile
high :-)
They said they pulled off 5 mbps.
Its funny, I remember conversatiosn
I thought I had seen this before. It's on the MT forums and from
23:43 August 26, 2007.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
Pretty impressive for 5.8Ghz.
Dang they just beat my 127 mile link using Trango radios from 4-5
years ago... :(
I don't think I have two mountaintops that far apart :(
Travis
Microserv
On 9/22/2010 4:49 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Pretty impressive for 5.8Ghz. I'm aware of numerous long 2.4G links, but
this is
Dang they just beat my 127 mile link using Trango radios from 4-5 years
ago... :(
*Jaw dropping smilie here*
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
Dang
I've seen a few of those records, but I would like to see records of
long distance *stable* connections, let's say four nines.
Rubens
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
Pretty impressive for 5.8Ghz. I'm aware of numerous long 2.4G links, but
this is
Not with that link - LOL
If you sneezed next to the antenna it would probably drop the link
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Talk about trash articles. This was terrible. I hope next time they do one of
these test they let us know so we can release a few hawks and a couple of guys
with 12 gauge shot guns. Not to mention you ever tried to copy 300gb files
from one computer to another over a standard 10/100 network.
Anyone installed ipplan lately? I can¹t get it to take the admin password
defined in config.php. I can get ot the install.php page but it prompts for
user/pass. At that point it won¹t take anything. This happened on 6beta
and the 4.x. I am assuming it is not an ipplan issue but maybe an
Totally agree.
When your Internet has to go 22,300 miles, at best, straight up for its first
hop even the speed of light begins to feel slow.
Speed of light = 186k miles per second. Light can travel that 22,300
miles 8.5 times in one second. That's back and forth 4 times in the
time you
Looks like mine is using http auth?
http://iam8up.com/ipplan/admin/usermanager.php
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
Anyone installed ipplan lately? I can’t get
I found my answer buried. It is because I had fast CGI installed.
Added this to an .htaccess file in the ipplan directory:
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw Follow me on Twitter
Crap, one of the hillbillies in the trailer park shot my best low
latency pigeon. Now they got free dinner and a movie;-)
Jim Patient
Cell: 314-565-6863
Desk: 636-692-4200
YIM: jeffcosoho
www.wlan1.com
www.linktechs.net
www.wifimidwest.com
On 9/22/2010 6:51 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Totally
ROFLMBO
Thanks!!!
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jim Patient
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 8:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons
That's the speed of light in a vacuum. It's somewhat slower in matter (air).
I use satellite internet here and the latency is a little under 800ms at best.
A ping has to go from my terminal up to the satellite, down to the earth
station, back up from the earth station, and back down to my
The latency can't be because of the distance. Rf travels too fast for
that. I expect there are large modem banks on the satellite.
On Sep 22, 2010 9:40 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the speed of light in a vacuum. It's somewhat slower in matter (air).
I use satellite
Did you ever talk on an overseas phone call that was via satellite? Did you
ever talk on a maritime satellite phone link? It takes practice to communicate
smoothly because of the long delay. It's why for voice traffic carriers prefer
undersea fiber.
What are modem banks?
Greg
On Sep 22,
I can't fully trust a man with a hyphenated last name
Thanks,
Chris Cooper
On Sep 22, 2010, at 6:43 PM, John Thomas jtho...@quarnet.com wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/networking/it-8217s-official-carrier-pigeons-are-faster-than-rural-internet/173?tag=nl.e539
---
---
---
---
That's about UK Pigeons. US pigeons are MUCH faster! My pigeons have a
13ms ping, verified by Speed Test .Net. I'm really getting tired of pigeon
bashing by the media. It all depends on the flock.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Check your math...
Best case scenarios:
c = 3e8 m/s = 3e5 km/s
l = 22000 mi = 35406 km
(35406 km) / (30 km/s) = 0.118 s = 118 ms
Round trip packet time due to RF delays only from ground point to ground
point = 472 ms
Patrick Shoemaker
Vector Data Systems LLC
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons faster then
I talked to the underworld via Ouija board once. It sucked.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons faster then rural wierless?
DECT phone in the install rig with a 10mhz radio and a ATA.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
10mhz will be rough. Maybe an ns2 an voip phone?
One installer used a cisco phone for this. He liked it, made me smile.
On Sep 22, 2010 1:11 PM,
Yeah, but IE9 ONLY works with Windows 7.
Al
-- At 10:10 PM 09/22/2010 -0400, Robert West wrote: ---
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_00D1_01CB5AA2.EE501AA0
Content-Language: en-us
Oh, hell. IE9. Get ready for the calls
..
From:
Another factor for us is contention. Our service provider's bandwidth is
oversold. So the packets have to wait.
We've used a couple of different providers and three different satellites and I
don't think I've ever seen a sub 600ms ping.
This is typical
64 bytes from 204.9.163.162: icmp_seq=0
Ah. Feeling rather full after dinner..
Bob.. Count your pigeons to see if any of them are missing..
Oh Boy !... The Stuffed Pigeons we had for dinner were very delicious...!
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
On 9/22/2010 10:08 PM, Robert West wrote:
That's about UK Pigeons. US
Of course. Would take much less effort to support everything else
My pal, Microsoft..
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Al Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FW:
Speechless...
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons faster then rural wierless?
Another factor for us is contention. Our
Also for Vista and 2008...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Al Stewart stewa...@westcreston.ca wrote:
Yeah, but IE9 ONLY works with Windows 7.
Al
-- At 10:10 PM 09/22/2010 -0400, Robert
Yep, just checked the log.. 6 lost packets.
DAMN YOU FAISAL!!
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Not Windows ME? I may need to upgrade
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FW: TechNet Flash: IE9 Beta is here
satellite internet sux! Try and argue!discussion has ended
--- On Wed, 9/22/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons faster then rural wierless?
To: fai...@snappydsl.net, 'WISPA General List'
Boy, that's for sure.
How many non-penetrating roof mounts have I refused to take after replacing
the BS dish with the good stuff...?
Lots.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Satellite Internet.
Don't ask, don't tell.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons faster then rural wierless?
Ended? Damn, and I had more whacked out stuff to say. Darn it!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons faster then rural
like
--- On Wed, 9/22/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Carrier pigeons faster then rural wierless?
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 11:01 PM
Boy, that’s for
They should get a ticket for hunting fiber during pigeon season!
Jim Patient
Cell: 314-565-6863
Desk: 636-692-4200
YIM: jeffcosoho
www.wlan1.com
www.linktechs.net
www.wifimidwest.com
On 9/21/2010 9:27 AM, David E. Smith wrote:
I know some of you don't like competiton, but this is going a bit
I can argue
Better than DIAL-UP!!
Jason Bailey wrote:
satellite internet sux! Try and argue!discussion has
ended
--- On Wed, 9/22/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
wrote:
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
I have to agree Satellite internet sux!!.. I'm supporting a few
companies that have Sat, and it's so unstable. 2:30pm till around
8:00pm you get about 1/4th the speed you're paying for.
Pings too are terrible, but I can't quite believe people are
complaining about 30ms pings. Here in Belize
People are never happy.
On Sep 23, 2010 12:20 AM, Mark Dueck m...@netking.bz wrote:
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Any hams on the list who know if the XR5 and XR3 meet Part 97
rules? I think the high-speed digital emission is legal on the 3.5
and 5.7 GHz ham bands... and these would be neat to have for VHF contests!
At 9/22/2010 06:49 PM, you wrote:
Pretty impressive for 5.8Ghz. I'm aware of numerous long
That is so true, and it reminds me of my son's favorite quote from Ice
Age 2 - copied from knol.google.com:
The adults were in the big part of the water park, while their children
were in the daycare center to have time by their selves. Not far from
the pool, an animal and his wife were on a
58 matches
Mail list logo
