We also have the customer claim it on their home owners if they don't
pay us for our CPE insurance. Home owners will cover it under their
damage claim. Just as if the house fell on a car they were renting or
borrowing for the weekend when the tornado came. It's not theirs but
insurance would also
Robert
up/down/aggregate
103972 MB 469598 MB 573570 MB
The guy downloaded 470 gigs in April. Paying $53.32 for 4 megabits down.
I got no responses at all about monthly caps on my previous email, but if
anyone could offer what bandwidth rates and monthly caps you are using I
would greatly
Robert
up/down/aggregate
103972 MB 469598 MB 573570 MB
The guy downloaded 470 gigs in April. Paying $53.32 for 4 megabits down.
I got no responses at all about monthly caps on my previous email, but if
anyone could offer what bandwidth rates and monthly caps you are using I
would
25GB per month. 128k/s after exceeding their limit.
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert
up/down/aggregate
103972 MB 469598 MB 573570 MB
The guy downloaded 470 gigs in April. Paying $53.32 for 4 megabits down.
I got no responses
Why not collect more revenue instead of limiting them? I suppose if the
customer wants to simply be throttled back instead of pay more, that's one
thing, but I imagine it makes more sense to capitalize on something.
Thinking along the lines of the on demand movies and stuff from cable
companies,
Not saying what I'm doing is right...I don't have enough spectrum to
continue to deliver the service...haven't figured anything else out yet.
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
Why not collect more revenue instead of limiting them?
I think it's important for people to (after gaining an understanding of
the impact they have on shared bandwidth) choose one of these...
1. pay more (either by overages or a different service plan that allows
for more costs more), or
2. change their behavior to not use so much
3. leave
I am
Chuck - Right or wrong is arguable, but if you don't have the spectrum then
I would do the same thing you are. I would argue it is right - you're
offering equal service to people for important things (Facebook
[communicating with family]) instead of letting moochers (Netflix) have the
runway.
Same here, Ligo failed.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Bruce Robertson br...@greatbasin.netwrote:
Ligo, yes.
On 05/02/2011 10:30 AM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Anyone else having problems with
Check with 360 Networks and Sunesys. They both have a presence in
Stockton, but I am not sure of their capabilities there. If those
don't work, let me know and I'll peruse my contacts for additional
ones.
Peter Di Giacomo
Sunesys
630-613-7253
Have a strange issue that is showing up in a few places. Was wondering what
peoples thoughts are on this
Here is how things are setup.
Every tower has a Mikrotik router on it. And is OSPF Routed.
Route to the customer is (Tower ATower BTower CTower DCustomer)
Tower A is where we have fiber, And
What backhauls? How many sessions on the BW test? TCP or UDP?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Monday, May 02,
I know it should be roughly the same, but what does testing the
powerbridge to the rocket show using ubiquiti's internal speed test, and
what does the quality and capacity numbers look like while running the
bandwidth from the customer side to the various towers?
On 5/2/11 4:20 PM, Nick Olsen
What is cost per megabit from your upstream?
Divide your cost per megabit by 120 to get a good idea of your cost
per gigabit at the NOC. If your paying $20 per megabit you would be
at 0.17$ per GByte.
Figuring your cost on the wireless network is nearly impossible. I am
considering:
Total
Haven't run the numbers, but it doesn't look like this number is taking
into consideration staff cost, other overhead such administrative cost,
insurance, non-wireless gear and most importantly a reasonable profit
margin.
Looking at it from the other direction, I currently spend about 20% of
This is even more of a difficult equation, because as ISPs, WE typically
are not billed by the GB from OUR upstream providers. We are billed,
generally-speaking, by one of two mechanisms:
1. Pipe speed... You pay for 50mbps and that's what you get. It doesn't
matter if you only use 20, and
Has anybody worked on allowing streaming video up to lets say 10 Mb total
transfer, then knocking THAT stream down to a slow rate?
This would allow for your average utube streaming of a small video, but kill
anything larger like netflix, hulu, etc.
IP Tables and a dynamic script should be able to
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 17:32, Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anybody worked on allowing streaming video up to lets say 10 Mb total
transfer, then knocking THAT stream down to a slow rate?
I tried something like that a while back - we got so very many angry phone
calls that the
To follow through some thinking here...
If that device was Billing-Server-Package-Aware then you could offer a
higher level of service for HD customers that allowed the Netflix
service to sense a higher-bandwidth connection and it may be more
likely to stream in HD than SD. I say offer...the
Maybe I missed it, but which state. If illinois, I can do
Scott Piehn
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson
To: motor...@afmug.com ; WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 1:08 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Looking for
I assumed Stockton, CA since that is near his coverage area.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 5/2/2011 7:31 PM, Scott Piehn wrote:
Maybe I missed it, but which
state. If
The Licenced Backhauls are Trango Apex 11ghz.
tower C and D connect via a Radwin 5ghz backhaul.
Default bandwidth test settings. so 20 sessions, And thats TCP bandwidth.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
From: Gino Villarini
Signal is ~-55
Airmax Quality=97%
Airmax Capacity=94%
Ubnt speedtest shows the same results from APSU.
Just a little bit slower then MT bandwidth test over the same link to the
tower router.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
From: Sam
Is this all routed or bridged?
If routed are there multiple paths back to tower B.
Are you doing any Queues that might be limiting bandwidth for the customers
IP?
-Louis
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Nick Olsen n...@flhsi.com wrote:
Signal is ~-55
Airmax Quality=97%
Airmax Capacity=94%
Those numbers hold steady while the MT bandwidth test is running?
Nick Olsen wrote:
Signal is ~-55
Airmax Quality=97%
Airmax Capacity=94%
Ubnt speedtest shows the same results from APSU.
Just a little bit slower then MT bandwidth test over the same link to
the tower router.
Nick Olsen
25 matches
Mail list logo
