Bench test = sleep more. ;)
On 2/9/2014 3:29 PM, heith petersen wrote:
I am hoping to get this all straightened out shortly so we can start
on routing these networks. I see a lot more sleepless nights ahead,
but I think I have the owners realizing that it will be all worth it.
They have been DFS2 friendly for a long time, yes. They've been tweaking the
false-positive reactions, but otherwise good.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com
To:
Blair Davis wrote,
I just went and read a bunch of the comments on the proceeding...
I didn't read them all, but I didn't find one in favor of the lower
antenna gain...
Has anyone else?
Motorola Solutions, makers of $6000 police walkie-talkies, explicitly
supports the lower gain
Interesting statement regarding Cisco.
They sell $3000 per unit mesh equipment whose range would be hurt if power
limits were dropped.
John
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On February 10, 2014 6:15:22 AM Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
Blair Davis
Which means more units...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 10, 2014 9:42 AM, John Thomas jtho...@quarnet.com wrote:
Interesting statement regarding Cisco.
They sell $3000 per unit mesh equipment whose range would be hurt if
On 2/10/2014 9:42 AM, John Thomas wrote:
Interesting statement regarding Cisco.
They sell $3000 per unit mesh equipment whose range would be hurt if
power limits were dropped.
John
But I don't think they do stuff with high-gain external antennas.
Peeking through Comments, Ericsson, btw,
So what about the cell companies that use 5GHz for a quick back haul while
waiting for their license to come in?
On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:20, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:42 AM, John Thomas wrote:
Interesting statement regarding Cisco.
They sell $3000 per unit
On 2/10/2014 10:21 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
So what about the cell companies that use 5GHz for a quick back haul
while waiting for their license to come in?
Not the ones commenting in favor of the proposal. I suppose the old
Motorola might have understood that, but Cambium now owns the
I’m with Forrest here.
Back in the “back ol’ days” of everyone running amps (we had to back then in
many cases) some vendors loved to sell more power. More power means faster
service at longer ranges right?
WRONG. Carrier to interference level is where your speed and distance comes
from.
Amen. Preach it Brother Marlon.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 10, 2014, at 12:19, Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181)
o...@odessaoffice.commailto:o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
I’m with Forrest here.
Back in the “back ol’ days” of everyone running amps (we had to back then in
many cases) some vendors
Anyone used one of these to monitor a solar battery setup?
Any comments?
Thanx
NGL
If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier!
flag.gif___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
You're mostly correct. You need to top -65 dB to get full modulation when you
have -95 dB of noise, so you still need the -55 signals if you're near any
civilization.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Marlon
Anyone has experience with this hosted voip SP?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
I would be happy to drive out there to give you a hand Arthur.
ryan
On 2/10/14 9:19 AM, Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181) wrote:
I'm with Forrest here.
Back in the back ol' days of everyone running amps (we had to back
then in many cases) some vendors loved to sell more power. More power
means
I don't even know of amps for 5GHz?
I thought this was mainly about antenna gain...
--
On 2/10/2014 3:14 PM, D. Ryan Spott wrote:
I would be happy to drive out there to give you a hand Arthur.
ryan
On 2/10/14 9:19 AM, Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181) wrote:
I'm with Forrest here.
Back in the
Good find. I have never used these,but I am going to order one and give it a try. On Monday, February 10, 2014 1:28 PM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:
Anyone used one of these to monitor a solar battery setup?
Any comments?
Thanx
NGL
If you can read this Thank A
16 matches
Mail list logo