So what about the cell companies that use 5GHz for a quick back haul while waiting for their license to come in?
On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:20, Fred Goldstein <fgoldst...@ionary.com> wrote: > On 2/10/2014 9:42 AM, John Thomas wrote: >> Interesting statement regarding Cisco. >> They sell $3000 per unit mesh equipment whose range would be hurt if power >> limits were dropped. >> >> John >> > > But I don't think they do stuff with high-gain external antennas. > > Peeking through Comments, Ericsson, btw, also supports the lower limits. > Again, a big supplier to the CMRS industry, so they probably see WISPs as > competitors. > > The WiFi Alliance also calls for the stricter gain limit, presumably because > they only care about their indoor applications and want to limit competing > users of the band. I don't know what companies are in the Alliance. > >> Sent with AquaMail for Android >> http://www.aqua-mail.com >> >> On February 10, 2014 6:15:22 AM Fred Goldstein <fgoldst...@ionary.com> wrote: >> >>> Blair Davis wrote, >>> >>> > I just went and read a >>> bunch of the comments on the proceeding... >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I didn't read them all, but I didn't find one in >>> favor of the lower antenna gain... >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Has anyone else? >>> >>> >>> >>> Motorola Solutions, makers of $6000 police walkie-talkies, explicitly >>> supports the lower gain limit. >>> >>> Cisco also supports the lower power rule. They only make local access >>> points, after all, and are buddy-buddy with the Bells. >>> >>> We should keep that in mind when making our purchase decisions. > > > -- > Fred R. Goldstein k1io fred "at" interisle.net > Interisle Consulting Group > +1 617 795 2701 > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
