If you've worked with any company that does mailers and is a member, would
you mind posting your experience (onlist or not)?
I'm looking at targeting an area and I'd rather not do all of that work
manually again.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Lorex\Market Broadband or something like that. They were talked about a couple
weeks ago.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
hi there
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
301-515-7774
IntAirNet - Fixed Wireless Broadband
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Guys,
I've been out of the loop for a couple years, regarding current status of
CAF/USF/Tax requirements for WISPs. I was surprised when I recieved my first
bill from my new upstream fiber provider.
(they are a dark fiber provider, recently expanded to also offer metro ethernet
IP)
Note: I
Excellent Summry. Can you clarify.
In previous ISM/UNII 5.750-5.850Ghz, the 2 to1 rule was allowed similar to
2.4Ghz, so that 5.8GHZ CPEs in Point-to-MultiPpoint systems could transmit
at PTP EIRP (higher than the AP 36db EIRP limit) as long as it was
increased
via antenna gain. Does
Guys,
I've been out of the loop for a couple years, regarding current status of
CAF/USF/Tax requirements for WISPs. I was surprised when I recieved my first
bill from my new upstream fiber provider.
(they are a dark fiber provider, recently expanded to also offer metro ethernet
IP)
Note: I
hey stranger.
On 04/15/2014 04:11 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
hi there
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
301-515-7774
IntAirNet - Fixed Wireless Broadband
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
On 4/15/2014 5:12 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Guys,
I've been out of the loop for a couple years, regarding current status
of CAF/USF/Tax requirements for WISPs. I was surprised when I
recieved my first bill from my new upstream fiber provider.
(they are a dark fiber provider, recently expanded to
condensed answer ..
1. You can claim exemption from communication taxes if you ask for ITNA
(Internet Taxation Freedom Act) Exemption.. (Most providers now have forms for
it, even though it is not easy to get them to provide the forms)., as long as
you are not in a grandfathered state.
On 4/15/2014 5:13 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Excellent Summry. Can you clarify.
In previous ISM/UNII 5.750-5.850Ghz, the 2 to1 rule was allowed similar to
2.4Ghz, so that 5.8GHZ CPEs in Point-to-MultiPpoint systems could transmit
at PTP EIRP (higher than the AP 36db EIRP limit) as
I believe the reason you are being taxed is because this is a transport and not
an internet circuit.
As far as I know the internet freedom act only applies to Internet access.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 15, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
Guys,
I've been
hmmm.. not quite accurate...
Internet Freedom Act was updated to allow for taxes not to apply to internet
access as well as communication circuits carrying internet access.
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Fred,
Ok, so in summary
A WISP Internet Provider is an Information Service and does not collect or
charge USF. And that end-to-end Internet Information Service solution is
composed of 3 In-line components, working togeather as one.
1. Wireless last mile (provider me)
2. Fiber-based
Oh really? Comcast wants to charge me 16% USF on a point to point to carry
Internet traffic.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 15, 2014, at 6:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote:
hmmm.. not quite accurate...
Internet Freedom Act was updated to allow for taxes not to
Even though you are addressing this to Fred,
I would like to point out where your confusion is coming from :-
First of all, you need to keep in mind that USF is a tax from the Federal Gov,
imposed on the Telecom Service Provider, however the Service provider is
allowed to recover this from
They all do. (i.e. try to screw the ISP/NSP/WISP)
Chase down the person in-charge of their Tax Dept, and ask them for ITNA Tax
Exemption Form
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option
For fixed point to-point transmitters that employ a directional antenna
gain greater than 23 dBi, a 1 dB reduction in maximum conducted output
power and maximum power spectral density is required for each 1 dB of
antenna gain in excess of 23 dBi”
What is the assumed transmitter power? 30dBm?
Wrong thread. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:39:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Spam] Re: New
Correct.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:54:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New FCC rules for 5 GHz bands
On 4/15/2014 6:54 PM, Dan Petermann wrote:
For fixed point to-point transmitters that employ a directional antenna
gain greater than 23 dBi, a 1 dB reduction in maximum conducted output
power and maximum power spectral density is required for each 1 dB of
antenna gain in excess of 23 dBi”
On 4/15/2014 6:39 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Fred,
Ok, so in summary
A WISP Internet Provider is an Information Service and does not collect or
charge USF. And that end-to-end Internet Information Service solution is
composed of 3 In-line components, working togeather as one.
1.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/pdf/uscode47/lii_usc_TI_47_CH_5_SC_I_SE_151.pdf
Regarding State TaxesIn support of Faisal's statements
The term ‘Internet access service’ does not include telecommunications
services, except to the extent such services are purchased, used,
or sold by a
State? Or Federal? I read that as USC - so it would be Federal.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 15, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/pdf/uscode47/lii_usc_TI_47_CH_5_SC_I_SE_151.pdf
Regarding State TaxesIn support of Faisal's
Im not understanding what you are asking, but
The link I provided was the bill (internet freedom act) extended through Nov
2014, stating that it made it federal law that no state could tax Internet
Access in any form.
The uncertainty came in what the definition was of Internet access. And
Right. Ok on the same page then. :)
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 15, 2014, at 9:06 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
Im not understanding what you are asking, but
The link I provided was the bill (internet freedom act) extended through Nov
2014, stating that it made it
The key for Comcast is to make sure your contract says intra-state and
not inter-state for the tax jurisdiction. They don't collect USF on
intra-state circuits, only local city/county/state taxes as applicable.
If your contract says inter-state (and it isn't inter-state), you can
harass your
Good info. What is their reasoning behind that?
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 15, 2014, at 9:05 PM, Kristian Hoffmann kh...@fire2wire.com wrote:
The key for Comcast is to make sure your contract says intra-state and not
inter-state for the tax jurisdiction. They don't collect USF on
Regarding USF
wholesaler must have evidence that the reseller customer both “(1)
[incorporates] the purchased telecommunications services into its own
offerings, and (2) can reasonably be expected to contribute to support
universal service based on revenues from those offerings.
In the
28 matches
Mail list logo
