Until someone cuts down the trees or repeals the laws of physics 3.65 will
never outperform 900 at equivalent power.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: "Scottie Arnett"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Wimax
When talking about 365 we have to understand that there are two product
groups: 802.11 based, WiMAX and somewhere in between :) the 802.11 based
can be used just as your basic 5 GHz (UBNT) without the interference. The
WiMAX group of products actually use different modulation and do achieve
excel
ryan
-Original Message-
From: Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 8:17 PM
To: sarn...@info-ed.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Wimax
The WiMax guys aren't interested in the WISP market... they are after the cell
guys and big operators looking to place 5,000 and 10,000 C
un...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 1:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Wimax
Hi,
We have two small 3.65 repeaters (serving only other small WiPOPs). The
3.65 does work, but our experience was that it did not do any better in
NLOS th
;419-706-7348 Cell
>419-668-4077 Fax
>mi...@wirelessconnections.net
>www.wirelessconnections.net
>
>-Original Message-
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Travis Johnson
>Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 1:33 AM
>To: WISPA Gen
27;s virgin territory.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Mike Cowan"
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 6:24 AM
> To: "'WISPA
om: "Mike Cowan"
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 6:24 AM
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Wimax
> It is true that a 802.11 based 3.650 product is not going to be any better
> than 2.4. A wimax based 3.650 product is going to gve field performan
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 1:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Wimax
Hi,
We have two small 3.65 repeaters (serving only other small WiPOPs). The
3.65 does work, but our experience
With Mikrotik, throughput is all the same regardless of frequency. So,
here is the throughput chart:
5mhz channel = 7Mbps
10mhz channel = 15Mbps
20mhz channel = 30Mbps
40mhz channel = 50Mbps
So, with 3.65ghz, the fastest you could get it 30Mbps because there is
only 25mhz of spectrum availabl
What kind of throughout are you getting on 3.65?
-RickG
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have two small 3.65 repeaters (serving only other small WiPOPs). The
> 3.65 does work, but our experience was that it did not do any better in
> NLOS than 2.4ghz would alread
Hi,
We have two small 3.65 repeaters (serving only other small WiPOPs). The
3.65 does work, but our experience was that it did not do any better in
NLOS than 2.4ghz would already do (when comparing the same type of radio
systems). There are several other radio features and "tricks" that the
hi
Several months ago I paid the small fee for the 365 "license" but have not
used it. We are looking to deploy something that has a little less
interference since there is quite a bit of 900mhz and 5.8ghz equipment
deployed where we are. Has anyone tested any of this equipment and how has
it worked
12 matches
Mail list logo
