General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation
Generally, you want QOS classifying as close the edges as you can get it.
Then you want your switches to honor the TOS/COS tags, then you want your
edge router to police/queue/fragment to your upstream.
John
-Original Message-
From
Look at Cisco Catalyst 500 series or HP Procurve series.
John
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:50 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation
I need a recommendation for a 12 port switch
, March 29, 2006 04:09 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation
I can't see how having a QOS switch could hurt...with VOIP, QOS in as
many places
as possible can only help...
Paul Hendry wrote:
Is the switch likely to be the bottle neck in your network? Surely you want
Thanks matt and larry.
I have a 2512 procurve that we like and a Dell switch as well.
Who makes the Dell switches for Dell?
Guess what I really want is to make sure that those little voice packets
get the priority :)
George
Matt Liotta wrote:
We've found that you don't really need a QoS
Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 1:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation
I need a recommendation for a 12 port switch that handles a high amount
of packet per second and has qos for voip.
Cost isn't an issue.
Anyone have a suggestion?
Thanks
George
--
WISPA
We've found that you don't really need a QoS capable switch. What is
more important is for the appropriate COS and TOS bits to be set by the
VoIP device(s) in question and have a switch capable of doing the right
thing with those packets. Every enterprise grade switch we have looked
at seems
