rules and straight up smart
tactics.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 3:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
I agree that everything written in F
t from us, if we let them.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council
better than the
competition?
And exclusive rights? I figure that will end up
in court, just as Cable TV and Telephone did.
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:20 PM
Su
ion Movies.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless
: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Hey try this
ber 21, 2006 5:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Brad,
There is a BIG difference. On tower agreements we do it with
non-interference clauses,or we buy up all the finite resources (in some
cases spectrum). Could you image what would happen if we wen
ice.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:45 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless pr
WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
They get exclusive rights to light poles for a mesh deployment. I'm not
at all advocating these projects but at the same time I just can't see
several mesh muni pr
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 2:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
They have been exclusive. But that is part of the problem. Some how some
people conclude that an open wholesale network
1, 2006 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Tom DeReggi wrote:
They have been exclusive. But that is part of the problem. Some how some
people conclude that an open wholesale network gets around the legallity
and intent the FCC has for unlicensed spectrum.
But
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal - exclusive
Are Exclusive MDU Access Agreements on Thin Regulatory Ice?
/By Carl E. Kandutsch, Ph.D., J.D/
Good arguments can be made for and against exclusive, perpetual access.
Will the use of
t's still a waiting
game. Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> They have been exclusive.
s
deploying and sometimes paying to be there. Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 2:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
They have been exclusive
Tom DeReggi wrote:
They have been exclusive. But that is part of the problem. Some how some
people conclude that an open wholesale network gets around the legallity
and intent the FCC has for unlicensed spectrum.
But I also feel it is anti-American and border line illegal for City
agreements
Are Exclusive MDU Access Agreements on Thin Regulatory Ice?
/By Carl E. Kandutsch, Ph.D., J.D/
Good arguments can be made for and against exclusive, perpetual access.
Will the use of exclusive access agreements between owners of
multi-dwelling unit (MDU) properties and communications providers
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Most of the Muni contracts I have worked on so far are exclusive. An RFP
would have been a better way to resolve the issue. Just letting an
Sounds like they had some pretty valid reasons to reject the proposal. It
sounded pretty onerous.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my
Wow...impressive! A city counsel that didn't fall for the snake oil
salesman...
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Council rejects wireles
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
I'm glad they recognized there would be a problem giving one person
I'm glad they recognized there would be a problem giving one person an
exclusive contract to serve the entire city, via city property.
I'm especially glad they got down to the technical details of unlicensed
frequency, in a public way.
Of course it helps when there is a councilman who underst
20 matches
Mail list logo
