: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Jon Langeler wrote:
Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that
Mikrotik's Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount of
transmit occurring on the designated Rx card? I've
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Jon Langeler wrote:
I don't want to beat this to death, but MT definitely says
otherwise, hmmm forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7t=20720 If
anyone has some time to really investigate let me know what you
find! :-)
My assumption was that since it is 802.11 based, there
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Jon Langeler wrote:
Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that Mikrotik's
Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount
Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that
Mikrotik's Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount of
transmit occurring on the designated Rx card? I've always assumed that
it was truly full duplex. But I've never really tested, wondering how
sure you were on
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Jon Langeler wrote:
Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that
Mikrotik's Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount
of transmit occurring on the designated Rx card? I've always
assumed that it was truly full duplex. But I've never really
StarOS V3 does true FDX with dual cards.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Mike Hammett wrote:
Other than N-Streme 2, what out there is true FDX and not just HDX with 50/50
balancing?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Star OS now has a FDX option. So does Tranzeo. (meaning a seperate radio
card for each direction)
PS: I'd argue that no 802.11 radio is 100% true Full Duplex, meaning the
802.11 proto responds on the same channel, but at Layer 3 they seperate
which channel is for sending and receiving.
For
