Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless

2008-01-04 Thread Jon Langeler
I don't want to beat this to death, but MT definitely says otherwise, 
hmmm forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7t=20720
If anyone has some time to really investigate let me know what you find! 
:-)


Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.


Tom DeReggi wrote:


Thats correct. Better said by Butch.

Don't get me wrong though, this is a huge benefit, for backbone 
capacity planning, to have Full Duplex at Layer3.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless



On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Jon Langeler wrote:

Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that 
Mikrotik's Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount of 
transmit occurring on the designated Rx card? I've always assumed 
that it was truly full duplex. But I've never really tested, 
wondering how sure you were on your PS below?



At the IP layer, it is true FDX.  However, NStreme (and NStreme dual) 
is based on 802.11 protocol.  There is some protocol information that 
is needed to maintain each individual link that is not happening at 
full duplex.  This is a very small amount of traffic, but is 
happening, nonetheless.


--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6
Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html


 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless

2008-01-04 Thread Butch Evans

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Jon Langeler wrote:

I don't want to beat this to death, but MT definitely says 
otherwise, hmmm forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7t=20720 If 
anyone has some time to really investigate let me know what you 
find! :-)


My assumption was that since it is 802.11 based, there is protocol 
information exchanged at the link layer.  This is apparently an 
incorrect assumption.  It was a Mikrotik engineer that made the 
statement that NStreme is based on 802.11, but for NStreme Dual, 
they have apparently made changes to the way it works so that all 
transmissions happen on one radio only.  I would go with their word 
on that.


--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6
Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless

2007-12-31 Thread Tom DeReggi

Thats correct. Better said by Butch.

Don't get me wrong though, this is a huge benefit, for backbone capacity 
planning, to have Full Duplex at Layer3.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless



On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Jon Langeler wrote:

Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that Mikrotik's 
Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount of transmit 
occurring on the designated Rx card? I've always assumed that it was truly 
full duplex. But I've never really tested, wondering how sure you were on 
your PS below?


At the IP layer, it is true FDX.  However, NStreme (and NStreme dual) is 
based on 802.11 protocol.  There is some protocol information that is 
needed to maintain each individual link that is not happening at full 
duplex.  This is a very small amount of traffic, but is happening, 
nonetheless.


--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6
Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless

2007-12-27 Thread Jon Langeler
Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that 
Mikrotik's Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount of 
transmit occurring on the designated Rx card? I've always assumed that 
it was truly full duplex. But I've never really tested, wondering how 
sure you were on your PS below?


Thanks

Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.

there is still some communication going on on the

Tom DeReggi wrote:

Star OS now has a FDX option. So does Tranzeo.  (meaning a seperate 
radio card for each direction)


PS: I'd argue that no 802.11 radio is 100% true Full Duplex, meaning 
the 802.11 proto responds on the same channel, but at Layer 3 they 
seperate which channel is for sending and receiving.


For True FDX, most of the Licensed Part101 Gear does it. TrangoGiga, 
Cable Free, Dragonwave, Ceragon.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - From: Mike Hammett 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 2:48 PM
Subject: [WISPA] FDX Wireless


Other than N-Streme 2, what out there is true FDX and not just HDX 
with 50/50 balancing?



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless

2007-12-27 Thread Butch Evans

On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Jon Langeler wrote:

Tom, just catching up on these. Is what your saying below, that 
Mikrotik's Nstreme2(dual card, FDX, PTP) still has a small amount 
of transmit occurring on the designated Rx card? I've always 
assumed that it was truly full duplex. But I've never really 
tested, wondering how sure you were on your PS below?


At the IP layer, it is true FDX.  However, NStreme (and NStreme 
dual) is based on 802.11 protocol.  There is some protocol 
information that is needed to maintain each individual link that is 
not happening at full duplex.  This is a very small amount of 
traffic, but is happening, nonetheless.


--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6
Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless

2007-12-23 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists

StarOS V3 does true FDX with dual cards.

Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com


Mike Hammett wrote:

Other than N-Streme 2, what out there is true FDX and not just HDX with 50/50 
balancing?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FDX Wireless

2007-12-23 Thread Tom DeReggi
Star OS now has a FDX option. So does Tranzeo.  (meaning a seperate radio 
card for each direction)


PS: I'd argue that no 802.11 radio is 100% true Full Duplex, meaning the 
802.11 proto responds on the same channel, but at Layer 3 they seperate 
which channel is for sending and receiving.


For True FDX, most of the Licensed Part101 Gear does it. TrangoGiga, Cable 
Free, Dragonwave, Ceragon.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 2:48 PM
Subject: [WISPA] FDX Wireless


Other than N-Streme 2, what out there is true FDX and not just HDX with 
50/50 balancing?



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/