Re: [WISPA] mikrotik - bridge - van - eoip questions

2014-07-02 Thread Matt Jenkins
Think of the bridge as a switch. You add ports (to the bridge) that you want to be part of your switch. \ So you can have untagged traffic on ether5 and ether7 send data to vlan20 on ether1 and vlan20 on ether9. You put all of those in a bridge. You cannot add a bridge to a bridge. I suggest

Re: [WISPA] mikrotik - bridge - van - eoip questions

2014-07-01 Thread Paul Hendry
Why not just have a separate management vlan or just stick a /30 address on the bridge with the other end on the vlan interface at your NOC/PoP? Cheers, P. On 02/07/2014 09:25, Josh Reynolds wrote: So, new question. Special project. cpe Router has a management ip cpe Router has a

Re: [WISPA] mikrotik - bridge - van - eoip questions

2014-07-01 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
If you keep these rules in mind, you will be able to sort out the confusion ... MT are routers.. Each Physical Port is an interface.    Vlan is tied to a Port (as such ports are Trunk Ports), and each VLAN/Port Combination is an virtual interface. If you want to make Two Interfaces talk to each

Re: [WISPA] mikrotik - bridge - van - eoip questions

2014-07-01 Thread Josh Reynolds
The untagged wan interface is the management network. There is full layer2 connectivity here, I just would like to be able to use an eoip tunnel for monitoring and bandwidth testing, because the vlan takes a different path on the network that doesn't go 278 miles away. On 07/01/2014 02:41 PM,

Re: [WISPA] mikrotik - bridge - van - eoip questions

2014-07-01 Thread Josh Reynolds
So I need to make two bridges then? 1 for the lan interface and wan side vlan, and 1 that bridges that bridge with the eoip tunnel? That doesn't seem right. On 07/01/2014 02:58 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: If you keep these rules in mind, you will be able to sort out the confusion ... MT are