RE: [WISPA] omni tower separation

2006-02-17 Thread Paul Hendry
Of Mac Dearman Sent: 17 February 2006 04:42 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation I to can kick in some experience here! I mounted an omni one time on top of a building on a tripod. I shoved the Omni as high as I could reach to push it up(hehehehe not to high

Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation

2006-02-16 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
I've always been taught that 18" is the minimum. marlon - Original Message - From: Kurt Fankhauser To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:12 AM Subject: [WISPA] omni tower separation Is 6 inches enough separation with a 9db

Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation

2006-02-16 Thread Rick Smith
actually, at 900 mhz, 36 is preferred. On one tower, with trango, using an OD9-11 (11 dbi vert omni), I saw 8-10 db improvements in my customer connections that were NLOS when I moved the antenna out from 24 to 36 Marlon K. Schafer wrote: I've always been taught that 18 is the

Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation

2006-02-16 Thread Tom DeReggi
PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:47 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation actually, at 900 mhz, 36 is preferred. On one tower, with trango, using an OD9-11 (11 dbi vert omni), I saw 8-10 db improvements in my customer connections

Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation

2006-02-16 Thread JohnnyO
: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:47 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation actually, at 900 mhz, 36 is preferred. On one tower, with trango, using an OD9-11 (11 dbi vert omni), I saw 8-10 db improvements in my

Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation

2006-02-16 Thread Mac Dearman
, February 16, 2006 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni tower separation I can tell you from experience, mounting it at 6 inches is not a good idea. We did that once, in a rush job, when the climbers were there and mounting hardware was not. Definate holes in coverage were identified after the fact