Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.10 branch + release schedule

2013-04-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 19.04.2013 21:45, schrieb Gerald Combs: On 4/18/13 5:17 PM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote: Note that we would still be committed to supporting OS X PPC and U3 users until Wireshark 1.10 reaches end of life in 2015. I suggest remove OsX PPC and U3 even for the 1.10 release. After a bit of research

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ready to remove all non-ui-manager code?

2011-09-21 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 14.09.2011 23:59, schrieb Joerg Mayer: Hello, would it be OK to remove the non-UI-MANAGER code in gtk/? I haven't seen any ongoing work in that area, so what (if anything) is missing from the UI-MANAGER codebase? The only things that come to my mind are the proto_help stuff and the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] plugins to builtins

2011-06-21 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 21.06.2011 10:23, schrieb Roland Knall: Now, the problems I had with the SercosIII plugin came from the fact, that it was a plugin, and therefore its proto_register method was called after(!) the proto_register method for the built-in dissectors. This lead to some confusion, where the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] plugins to builtins

2011-06-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 20.06.2011 16:29, schrieb mman...@netscape.net: (just added myself to the mailing list so I can include reply history to the topic. This message touches on both Jaap's and Roland's comments) As the (main) author of the PROFINET plugin I may add a few cents ... Excuse me if I'm slightly

Re: [Wireshark-dev] plugins to builtins

2011-06-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 21.06.2011 00:27, schrieb Roland Knall: Hi There is nothing technically wrong with dissectors being developed as plugins. There might be some technical questions that arise from that fact, if another dissector is using them, but for now, those issues seemed to be dealt with correctly (for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 31978: /trunk/plugins/profinet/ /trunk/plugins/profinet/: packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c

2010-02-24 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 24.02.2010 09:22, schrieb s...@wireshark.org: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=31978 User: stig Date: 2010/02/24 12:22 AM Log: From Hannes Diethelm via bug 4525: Corrected values for IdentInfo (which was obviously wrong) I've checked against the specs

Re: [Wireshark-dev] how to submit code to wireshark..??

2010-01-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 20.01.2010 02:36, schrieb Brian Oleksa: Japp and Chris Thank you for the reply. I really understand that you must follow the code standards or you will have problems down the road. I also understand that the core developers don't have much free time. My next question is: If the code is

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How about moving from svn to git?

2009-11-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: Hello, this is just something that went through my mind yesterday while working on the third patch on the same files and without a chance to commit between the patches. If there is one thing that I don't like (although I do it sometimes) is to do a commit that does

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 30825: /trunk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common gui_utils.c gui_utils.h main_proto_draw.c main_statusbar.c /trunk/image/: expert_chat.h expert_chat.png expert_c

2009-11-04 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: Stig Bjørlykke wrote: I really like the new icons! This may be very personal, but I think the blue chat and the gray none are a bit too dark. I think the chat icon should be more like the blue used in the background, and the gray more anonymous. The red and

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.2.3 is now available

2009-10-27 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: Getting Wireshark Wireshark source code and installation packages are available from the download page on the main web site. Hi! Why not simply say: Wireshark source code and installation packages are available from: http://www.wireshark.org/download.html

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New packet list is now the default.

2009-09-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Anders Broman schrieb: Hi, I've made the new packet list the default build choice. I think it's in a reasonable state and making it the default will help in fixing any remaining issues. Hi! I guess I've started the first coding experiments on this topic some years ago, so I'm very pleased

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Permission to Print.

2009-09-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Long Lee schrieb: Hello everyone, I bring a soft copy of the Wireshark user's guide: 29944 to the print shop to print a hard copy for personal use. I was told that the can not print this document because of it's copyright. According to page 2 of the WireShark document, it stated:

[Wireshark-dev] Time for a new development release?

2009-07-23 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! My colleagues would like to use the latest PROFINET dissector enhancements, that are not part of the stable release. The latest development release 1.1.3 at http://www.wireshark.org/download.html is a bit, well, outdated. I don't like to advise my colleagues to use the daily builds, as they

[Wireshark-dev] Compile problems of capture_if_details_dlg_win32.c on MSVC2008EE and MSVC2005

2009-06-28 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! After updating to the latest SVN, I get: capture_if_details_dlg_win32.c capture_if_details_dlg_win32.c(512) : error C2065: 'Ndis802_11AuthModeWPA2' : un declared identifier capture_if_details_dlg_win32.c(512) : error C2099: initializer is not a constant capture_if_details_dlg_win32.c(512)

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compile problems of capture_if_details_dlg_win32.c on MSVC2008EE and MSVC2005

2009-06-28 Thread Ulf Lamping
Kovarththanan Rajaratnam schrieb: I've seen the same problem on a MSVC2005 installation. Any ideas what changed in the last few weeks/months and what to do? This problem has existed for a while. See: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3439 Thanks for pointing me to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] build wireshark on Windows xp with VC 6.0 failed

2009-06-28 Thread Ulf Lamping
Fenggen Jia schrieb: When building the latest wireshark source from SVN(28879), the following problem occurs: mt: unknown option -- n usage: mt [-V] [-f device] operation [count] NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'mt.exe' : return code '0x1' Stop. The mt version i'm using is below:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-22 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: g...@wireshark.org schrieb: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi? view=revrevision=28794 User: guy Date: 2009/06/21 12:16 PM Log: main_menu.[ch] - menus.[ch]; it handles not only the main menu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-22 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: On Jun 21, 2009, at 11:53 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: But what are you trying to achieve? Being able to find files that implement more than main things, whether it's the main menu or the main window. What I've tried to point out is that having less prefixes makes

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-22 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: On Jun 22, 2009, at 1:41 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote: Now you're telling me that file name in question is not 100% correct so you're changing it back into the chaos we once had - ignoring the benefits we could get from the name prefixes.f I'm unconvinced

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-21 Thread Ulf Lamping
g...@wireshark.org schrieb: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=28794 User: guy Date: 2009/06/21 12:16 PM Log: main_menu.[ch] - menus.[ch]; it handles not only the main menu, but context menus. Which menus that are not part of the main window does it

Re: [Wireshark-dev] writing non-Ethernet pcapng files

2009-05-21 Thread Ulf Lamping
Aaron Turner schrieb: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Michael Tüxen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote: On May 21, 2009, at 9:15 PM, Aaron Turner wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Michael Tüxen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote: Hi Aaron, can you check also with the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27790: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/crc/: Makefile.am Makefile.common Makefile.nmake crc-16-plain.c crc-16-plain.h /trunk/epan/: Makefile.am Makefile.nmake crc16.c c

2009-03-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
ger...@wireshark.org schrieb: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=27790 User: gerald Date: 2009/03/18 02:59 PM Log: Create an epan/crc directory for CRC code. Add crc-16-plain.[ch], generated from pycrc. The command line used to generate the file is in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New CRC code (Was: Re: WS 1.1.3 release?)

2009-03-18 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: Richard van der Hoff wrote: Also, it might be useful to have all of the CRC code in one place, such as epan/crc/. It would be _really_ useful if each of our CRC modules listed their corresponding parameters. As the original author of epan/crc16.c, I couldn't agree

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27748: /trunk/plugins/profinet/ /trunk/plugins/profinet/: Makefile.common crc16.c crc16.h moduleinfo.h moduleinfo.nmake packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c packet-pn-rt.c

2009-03-16 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:40:03PM +, u...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=27748 crc16 algorithm copied from Linux sources (GPL V2 only!) So far the wireshark sources are v2 or later - so adding a gplv2 only file

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27748:/trunk/plugins/profinet/ /trunk/plugins/profinet/:Makefile.common crc16.c crc16.h moduleinfo.h moduleinfo.nmakepacket-dcerpc-pn-io.c packet-pn-rt.c

2009-03-16 Thread Ulf Lamping
Anders Broman schrieb: Hi, Isn't there a couple of crc versions in epan? Yes, and I tried the existing stuff. Unfortunately, there seems to be a multitude of possible implementations - none of the existing ones are compatible. I'm not an expert on this stuff, so it might be easy to rewrite

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27748: /trunk/plugins/profinet/ /trunk/plugins/profinet/: Makefile.common crc16.c crc16.h moduleinfo.h moduleinfo.nmake packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c packet-pn-rt.c

2009-03-16 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:40:03PM +, u...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi? view=revrevision=27748 crc16 algorithm copied from Linux sources (GPL V2 only!) So far the wireshark

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GeoIP information presentation

2009-03-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jaap Keuter schrieb: Hi list, Currently the GeoIP information is an alternating list of source and destination paramters, like so: [Source GeoIP Country: China] [Destination GeoIP Country: Japan] [Source GeoIP City: Tokyo, 40] [Destination GeoIP City: Tokyo, 40]

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [GeoIP] New map of IP locations

2009-02-15 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: On Feb 15, 2009, at 2:26 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote: 2) The file ipmap.html will be copied from the program(data?) to the temp folder. Why make the copy? The ipmap.txt file is generated, so it can't be put into the (read-only) program/bin dir. The ipmap.html file has

[Wireshark-dev] News from the msvcr dll hell ... and a possible solution!

2009-02-15 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! On a computer without any Visual Studio version installed I tested my private Wireshark build compiled with Visual Studio 2005 Express Edition and with it's own installer. As usual, this installer will call the vcredist_x86.exe, so it installs the msvcr80.dll for the 2005 studio. However,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27437: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_if_dlg.c

2009-02-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
g...@wireshark.org schrieb: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=27437 User: guy Date: 2009/02/11 05:48 PM Log: Use network_virtual_16.xpm for VMware interfaces on OS X (well, use them if VMware Fusion ever lets you capture on them, which it currently

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27411: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: main_menu.c

2009-02-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Sake Blok schrieb: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:22:27PM +, u...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=27411 User: ulfl Date: 2009/02/10 01:22 PM [...] add/change accelerator keys: Time Display Format control1 - control6 Hmmm...

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark web site

2009-02-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
Andrew Hood schrieb: Has there been some significant change made to www.wireshark.org ? It is almost unreadable in Firefox 2, Firefox 3, and an old version of Mozilla. It was OK a few weeks ago. FF3 on XP seems ok. Although the display of the menu if really too slow now. Some Internet

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help

2009-02-06 Thread Ulf Lamping
Maizza Falah schrieb: I'm using Fedora 8, on a i386. I downloaded the rpm of wireshark. Then, as root, put, in a terminal, the command: rpm -ivh wireshark-jgroups-1.0.3-1.fc8.i386.rpm It didn't show any error. But when I put the command: wireshark It says: bash: wireshark:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] text output from command line

2009-02-03 Thread Ulf Lamping
atdev.quer...@wipro.com schrieb: Hi all, You all know after loading a packet we could have the information of the loaded packets in text format (menu-export-as plain text file-xxx). Can we do the same from the command line? Is that possible? Is it possible to use the user ML for such

Re: [Wireshark-dev] After latitude/longitude - construct a URL that takes you to a map?

2009-02-03 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:03 PM, u...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=27365 User: ulfl Date: 2009/02/03 05:03 PM Log: add display of GeoIP latitude/longitude And now for our next trick?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Open Watcom C compiler ?

2009-02-02 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: Kukosa, Tomas wrote: Hi, does it make sence to have Wireshark compileable for Windows platform with Watcom C? (http://openwatcom.org) What is your opinion? Is there here any active user of this compiler? Is the Watcom C library GPL-compatible? Could we use it

Re: [Wireshark-dev] MSVC variant problem in v1.0.5

2009-01-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
gogr...@wi.rr.com schrieb: Darn. So does this mean that when the ABI changes, I will have to compile the plugin with the new source? Yes and no, see below. Also, what is ABI? Application Binary Interface This is the interface provided by Wireshark to the plugins. Some background This ABI

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New toplevel Telephone menu item

2009-01-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
Michael Tüxen schrieb: That sound like an excellent idea... Hmmm, I'm not that sure. On Jan 29, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Guy Harris wrote: On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:27 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote: I like the idea, but I do not think that the SCTP related items should be moved there. It is correct

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New toplevel Telephone menu item

2009-01-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jaap Keuter schrieb: Hi, Well that was easy: grep 'everything with telephone icon' | xargs mv menu/Telephony ;) No, even easier: There was already a menu group telephony, I only needed to put this into a seperate menu ;-) I'm oke with this idea, but would suggest to call it 'Telecom'

[Wireshark-dev] Windows: Specific icons for capture interfaces (using a name heuristic)

2009-01-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! Another patch I had lying around for months ... The following will only have an effect on Windows based systems (I know to little about Unix systems to do it right here) ... If you have more than one or two capture interfaces (especially with the usually long capture interface names on

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issue loading a new plugin

2009-01-28 Thread Ulf Lamping
Heude Pascal schrieb: Hello Jim, Do you try to build the whole wireshark or only to build your dll ? I had this problem on some windows version and I solved it by building the whole wireshark. But I still do not know why ! Pascal James Gallogly a écrit : I am trying to develop a

[Wireshark-dev] New toplevel Telephone menu item

2009-01-28 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! There was a patch lingering around on my hard drive for months, so I thought: commit it and let's see what people think. Motivation: very long toplevel menus are hard to handle. They are hard to scan, hard to remember and hard to work with (e.g. the longer the menu get's, it's harder to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.0.5 is now available

2008-12-12 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: June is so very far away and there are a ton of cool new features in the trunk. Do we really have to wait that long? :) Well, if we are in a hurry, we might be able to have a christmas release - SCNR ;-) If I copy /trunk to /trunk-1.2 around March or April, that

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 3115] Wireshark on Windows Server 2008 - not in the docs

2008-12-12 Thread Ulf Lamping
bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org schrieb: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3115 --- Comment #5 from Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org 2008-12-12 17:02:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) It looks like they were both generated from the web site, but now differ by one

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.0.5 is now available

2008-12-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.0.5. Hi Gerald! Good news :-) Any ideas, when you want to make the current dev 1.1.x the new release branch (aka 1.2.0)? Probably next Sharkfest? Regards, ULFL

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26944: /trunk/plugins/profinet/ /trunk/plugins/profinet/: packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c

2008-12-09 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=26944 User: stig Date: 2008/12/09 05:42 AM Log: From Jim Young (bug 3105): Trivial patch to change two C++ style comments to standard C style comments. Sh..! Sorry for any inconvenience,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PCAP File Question

2008-12-02 Thread Ulf Lamping
Barry Constantine schrieb: Hello, My company builds hardware based network analyzers and we are going to capture 1G/10G line rate and store in native pcap format. If possible, it would be beneficial for us to store some extra information in the packet headers that is unique to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to share enhanced plugin

2008-12-02 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jaap Keuter schrieb: Hi, I always wondered why this isn't included in the Windows build scripts. Can anyone shed some light on that? Hi! Simply I got no trouble with it and noone else cared about it? ;-) Regards, ULFL ___ Wireshark-dev mailing

Re: [Wireshark-dev] heuristic Dissector for Dummies

2008-09-09 Thread Ulf Lamping
Maynard, Chris schrieb: Nice job Ulf. Thanks! Attached is a small patch with minor formatting changes and a few XXX's filled in with some additional information. Applied as SVN 26170 - thanks :-) I do have one more question/thought about heuristic dissectors as it pertains to TCP

Re: [Wireshark-dev] trunk vs trunk-1.0

2008-09-04 Thread Ulf Lamping
Brown, Mark C (WTEC) schrieb: How/when do changes to the development branch get merged into the stable branch? Is there a specific process? I submitted some simple changes back in April (bug 2451/SVN 24926) that I'd love to see in the stable branch... Hi Mark! The development vs. stable

Re: [Wireshark-dev] heuristic Dissector for Dummies

2008-08-29 Thread Ulf Lamping
Tom Stevens schrieb: Hello! Is there a simple tutorial on the web where i can find some information about how to write a heuristic dissector. http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChapterDissection.html - On this side i couldn't find anything about heuristic dissectors. May

Re: [Wireshark-dev] heuristic Dissector for Dummies

2008-08-29 Thread Ulf Lamping
Peter Johansson schrieb: Nicely put Ulf! This information is certainly a candidate for addition to the Wireshark Wiki. Thanks! While writing it, I was having in mind to put it into the sources doc dir. As it turns out, this info might also be of general interest for the common WS user -

Re: [Wireshark-dev] VALS macro causing Wireshark to crash on Windows

2008-08-06 Thread Ulf Lamping
Chih Wang schrieb: Hi all, I have a custom dissector in plugin form originally developed on Linux (Ubuntu on x86). Wireshark ran fine on the system with the plugin. The code was moved to a Windows XP box verbatim. After setting up the build environment on the box, I was able to build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] First time compiling with VS2008EE

2008-08-06 Thread Ulf Lamping
Maynard, Chris schrieb: When I ran wireshark to test it, one thing I noticed that I hadn't before is that when I did a File - Open, then dragged the dialog window across the main page, the main page was corrupted with window edges of the dragged FileOpen dialog. I don't recall that happening

Re: [Wireshark-dev] performing cpu/time intensive computation in a protocol dissector

2008-08-05 Thread Ulf Lamping
Sake Blok schrieb: On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:22:58PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: hello, In a pending patch for the SSL dissector: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2725 https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2029 it's implemented the attack to CVE 2008

[Wireshark-dev] What's the versions of GTK and GLib we're expecting as a minimum?

2008-05-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! Being on the road the last two weeks, I'm a bit out of sync with current WS development ;-) What's the current version we require for the developer (latest) trunk: GTK: 2.4? GLib: ? Regards, ULFL ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list

Re: [Wireshark-dev] What's the versions of GTK and GLib we're expecting as a minimum?

2008-05-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stephen Fisher schrieb: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:29:50AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote: What's the current version we require for the developer (latest) trunk: On Unix, the configure script enforces the following minimum version numbers: On Windows, we ship our own GTK/GLib

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problem (and fix?) building pdfs from docbook

2008-05-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: I'm running opensuse-factory with fop-0.94. When trying to build the documentation, it failed. After making the follwing change I could build the docs again: Index: custom_layer_pdf.xsl === ---

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Requiring GTK+ 2.4 or later

2008-05-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: Jeff Morriss wrote: packaging/svr4/checkinstall.in also uses the GTK version for install-time dependency checking but I can't seem to figure out how to get a variable in configure.in to populate that file when it builds the real file. (OTOH it would be convenient

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling with VS-2005

2008-05-09 Thread Ulf Lamping
Maynard, Chris schrieb: Would installing the redistributable package from Microsoft on the other machines resolve Barry's problem? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=32BC1BEE-A3F9-4 C13-9C99-220B62A191EEdisplaylang=en I would expect No. The redistributable package

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:20:31PM -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote: The Widget settings I've chosen are for a min. resolution of 1024*768, before scrollbars appear (well, slightly less about 1000*700 or so, so there's some space left for things like a startmenu).

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should we support GTK+ 2.0[.x] and 2.2[.x], or just 2.4 and later?

2008-04-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: The SVN trunk of Wireshark has had the GTK+ 1.2[.x]/GLib 1.2[.x] support removed. There's still code in there that checks for GTK+ releases prior to 2.4; however: 1) I checked in a fix to the configure script and to gtk/file_dlg.c that prevented Wireshark from

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: Ulf Lamping wrote: I would be interested in feedback: - was the page intuitive right from the start or was something really confusing? - something missing / should be added? - should something really be removed? - what do you think about this page in general

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: On 19. april. 2008, at 15.39, Ulf Lamping wrote: Huh, that was a real though one - I spend several days on it now, but still no optimal solution! My list of recent files is empty after this update, and I get this new warnings on startup, both on Ubuntu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs schrieb: Ulf Lamping wrote: However, a basic news panel *might* be useful. Problem here: for example you won't get freshly developed features if you are using the WS release versions. I currently don't see a good way to handle these problems, but this might be a future thing

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jim Young schrieb: Attached patch (to SVN 25119) stops these particular messages during startup of Wireshark on my system. In my case it's the first call to gtk/main_welcome.c's main_welcome_reset_recent_capture_files() that triggers the error messages. Specifically it's the call to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: On 19. april. 2008, at 15.39, Ulf Lamping wrote: Huh, that was a real though one - I spend several days on it now, but still no optimal solution! My list of recent files is empty after this update, and I get this new warnings on startup, both on Ubuntu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25011: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: main_menu.c

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=25011 User: tuexen Date: 2008/04/14 01:51 AM Log: #ifdef HAVE_LUA_5_1 the handling of REGISTER_TOOLS_GROUP_NONE Does this make a lot of sense, as the Tools top menu is now permanently existing?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Ulf Lamping schrieb: Jim Young schrieb: Attached patch (to SVN 25119) stops these particular messages during startup of Wireshark on my system. In my case it's the first call to gtk/main_welcome.c's main_welcome_reset_recent_capture_files() that triggers the error messages

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-19 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: When starting a capture with a file loaded, or restarting a running capture, we always get the welcome page in a split second after the current file is closed and before the new capture starts. Maybe we should have the old empty page in this situations? We

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jaap Keuter schrieb: Hi, Carefull here. You suggest to prune the list if captures aren't found. What happens when captures are on a network share you forgot to mount? Or even more likely, your Notebook is simply not connected to the/any network :-) Then your list would be gone, while you

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: One thing about the capture sections: In case I start wireshark without capture privileges this should be displayed instead of providing an empty list of capture interfaces. Is this the behaviour that you see? Than it's a bug. The list of interfaces is build by asking

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: Stig Bjørlykke wrote: On startup I get this warning: (wireshark:26750): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_container_foreach: assertion `GTK_IS_CONTAINER (container)' failed That appears to be happening in the gtk_container_foreach() call in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25062: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: dlg_utils.c

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: 2008/4/16, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED]: P.S: There's also some strange words in your button labels Hjelp, but there's not a lot I can do about it ;-))) Is it possible to disable locale in wireshark? Most text in wireshark is english, so it doesn't make

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: I'm not talking about removing it from the recently-used list but just to not display it on the welcome page. I guess not displaying it on the list would be confusing to users why is it gone now?. What I did is to gray out items that are currently not available, which

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jaap Keuter schrieb: Hi Ulf, I like it, it's clean, simple, uncluttered. Lets see that we can keep it that way gentlemen. Ack On the tip of the day: as long as it doesn't required a mouse click to get rid of it I'm oke with it. It would be another section in the right hand column.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Graeme Lunt schrieb: Brilliant! Thanks! One suggestion - how about including the version information (including a build date)? No, that's what the about dialog is for. I want to avoid too much information on that page, because it will get more and more confusing and less informative.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: 2008/4/17, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What I did is to gray out items that are currently not available, which makes much more sense to me. But it is possible to select them, and a warning will pop up when selecting one. It does disappear from

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:29:14AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote: Is this the behaviour that you see? Than it's a bug. The list of interfaces is build by asking dumpcap about the interface list (which should have the privileges), so the privileges of Wireshark shouldn't

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: Just some small comments: - Hiding an interface in the interface options does not update the interface list in the welcome page. Sounds reasonable. I'll implement it - remind me in a week or so, in case I'll forget about to do it. - When having a lot of

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Michael Tüxen schrieb: Hi Ulf, I really like it. And I think it should have a clean not overload design. Like it is now. One comment from me: There is a column 'Online' which I would then expect to contain all contents which is online. But this is not true... There are links to the Wiki

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25072: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: dlg_utils.c export_object.c stock_icons.c stock_icons.h

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stephen Fisher schrieb: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:47:20AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=25072 User: ulfl Date: 2008/04/16 08:47 AM Log: add Save As and Save All buttons to the dialog / stock_icons utils use them in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-17 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stephen Fisher schrieb: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:21:37AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote I've just finished the initial version of a Wireshark welcome page. That welcome page is shown when no capture file is loaded - well, you'll immediately see it just when you start Wireshark (SVN25083

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25062: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: dlg_utils.c

2008-04-16 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: 2008/4/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: special handling for the dialog boxes Copy buttons, as the behaviour is more like an auxiliary button (like Help), than one of the action buttons as Ok (as e.g. Ok will close the dialog). To make this more

[Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-16 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! I've just finished the initial version of a Wireshark welcome page. That welcome page is shown when no capture file is loaded - well, you'll immediately see it just when you start Wireshark (SVN25083 or later). It contains stuff that should be useful to start work with Wireshark (both

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-16 Thread Ulf Lamping
Maynard, Chris schrieb: Hi Ulf, I like it. I always thought the blank gray screen at startup was somewhat plain and boring. We've got all the real estate to do something with, why not put it to good use? Somewhat related to this - I was thinking about proposing a Wireshark Tips at

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-16 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: On Apr 16, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Maynard, Chris wrote: Hi Ulf, I like it. I always thought the blank gray screen at startup was somewhat plain and boring. We've got all the real estate to do something with, why not put it to good use? Yes - the new one gets a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building on Windows XP

2008-04-15 Thread Ulf Lamping
L. Mark Pilant schrieb: HI Ulf. Do you have a adns.tmp dir in your WS sources? Do you have a C:\wireshark-win32-libs\MSVC2003\adns? Do you have C:\wireshark\adns.tmp\adns_win32\lib\adns_dll.dll? The Wireshark directory and Wireshark-win32-libs directories, for this test, were

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building on Windows XP

2008-04-15 Thread Ulf Lamping
L. Mark Pilant schrieb: I may go try this on another machine which has never seen WS work. That way I know everything will be clean without having to worry about little droppings left over :-) A, think I got it. It was the misplaced line: cd ..\lib that was only called for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] se_tree_foreach() not compiling under XP

2008-04-14 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hello I can’t compile my code with the function se_tree_foreach (from emem.h), I got following error (if I comment out the function it runs sucessfully): LINK : warning LNK4098: defaultlib 'LIBCMT' conflicts with use of other libs; use/NODEFAULTLIB:library

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building on Windows XP

2008-04-14 Thread Ulf Lamping
L. Mark Pilant schrieb: I started with a fresh copy of Wireshark (to revision 25024) to a new directory and a clean wireshark-win32-libs directory (I renamed the old one to force fresh fetching of the files). Then I did: nmake -f Makefile.nmake distclean nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup

[Wireshark-dev] mixed strdup() with g_free()

2008-04-14 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! In SVN25037 I've replaced some strdup() with calls to g_strdup(). If you want to free the allocated memory later with g_free(), this doesn't work (at least) on MSVC2005 builds! However, this is unclean and potentially dangerous on other systems as well - AFAIK GLib makes no guarantees what

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Switching to getopt_long() - or to g_option?

2008-04-14 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Comment #1 from Andrew Feren [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 11:35:31 GMT --- The choice of -x for the commandline argument was arbitrary. I didn't see any particular reasoning for the other switch choices so I started at z and worked

[Wireshark-dev] test code (test/suite_capture.sh) uses icmp capture filter all the time?

2008-04-13 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! Just stumbled across the filter string icmp in test/suite_capture.sh (several places): $DUT -i $TRAFFIC_CAPTURE_IFACE $TRAFFIC_CAPTURE_PROMISC \ -w ./testout.pcap \ -c 10 \ -a duration:$TRAFFIC_CAPTURE_DURATION \ -f icmp \ ./testout.txt 21 I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] expert info indicator icons

2008-04-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stephen Donnelly schrieb: Rebuilt today (24884), the icon is certainly bigger and fills the available space more completely. The positioning looks okay. Shapewise it looks slightly octagonal, possibly an alpha/aliasing issue. Exactly, your screenshots looks like on my Windows machine. The

[Wireshark-dev] GTK1: code cleanup status and some open points

2008-04-09 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! Lot's of stuff already done for the GTK1 cleanup, but we could still need a helping hand ... DONE: reduced #if GTK_MAJOR_VERSION to two appearances where they make sense, e.g. removed GTK1 specific code and where necessary replaced this #if by GTK_CHECK_VERSION (example: gtk_file_chooser

Re: [Wireshark-dev] expert info indicator icons

2008-04-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
Ulf Lamping schrieb: Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: Ulf: I like the new led indicator, but I don't like the icons. Do you plan to make some better looking ones? They seem to be out of shape I also noticed that the icons are not as well shaped as I want them to be. They are just quickly

Re: [Wireshark-dev] expert info indicator icons

2008-04-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stephen Donnelly schrieb: Glad to see the Expert LED in the code already, fast work! Thanks! Happens if you have some time on the plane from Sharkfest back home ;-) Having the click action launch the Expert composite is a nice touch. I'm using it already myself :-) The current icon

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Redefining gtk version in uat_gui.c?

2008-04-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
Luis EG Ontanon schrieb: I probably just copied these from another file (color filters maybe?). I never noticed this. On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Stephen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does this code at the top of gtk/uat_gui.c redefine GTK_MAJOR_VERSION to 1 if it is = 2??

Re: [Wireshark-dev] expert info window shows 2 lines for 1 packet

2008-04-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
Toralf Förster schrieb: I found that (pls. see attached screen shot) with version : That's how the implementation is working, it won't combine items on that level. The info that it happens two times in a packet is an information bit by itself that I personally would like to know. In your

  1   2   3   4   5   >