Maynard, Chris wrote:
Recently having submitted a protocol dissector and written a wiki page for
it, I was reminded of a very handy web site for protocol documentation that I
reference quite often, namely http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/Protocol.htm.
I think the folks at Network
and maybe others would too.
- Chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jeff Morriss
Sent: Fri 11/9/2007 9:10 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Network Sorcery and protocol documentation
Maynard, Chris wrote:
Recently having
AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Network Sorcery and protocol documentation
Maynard, Chris wrote:
Recently having submitted a protocol dissector and written a wiki page for
it, I was reminded of a very handy web site for protocol documentation
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Network Sorcery and protocol documentation
So you hit compose new mail (or its equivalent) to send that email?
That's strange because your first email about this Network Sorcery
thread contains:
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:47:04PM -0500, Maynard, Chris wrote:
I was reminded of a very handy web site for protocol documentation
that I reference quite often, namely
http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/Protocol.htm.
Anyway, I personally think the format is somewhat superior to the
current
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:57:19PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
that I reference quite often, namely
http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/Protocol.htm.
The network sorcery pages are a wonderful reference. Our protocol pages
should be geared more toward how the protocol is dissected in
Recently having submitted a protocol dissector and written a wiki page for it,
I was reminded of a very handy web site for protocol documentation that I
reference quite often, namely http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/Protocol.htm.
I think the folks at Network Sorcery did a really nice job at
