So you hit "compose new mail" (or its equivalent) to send that email?
That's strange because your first email about this Network Sorcery
thread contains:
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which are the Message-IDs for a few of the messages in the "0.99.7
release?" thread. Usually mail clients only include References: for
other emails if you "Reply" to messages in that thread.
Maynard, Chris wrote:
> I have no idea what you're talking about here. This thread had nothing to do
> with the 0.99.7 release. I started it as a new thread that simply discusses
> the Network Sorcery site and ways to possibly improve documentation or at
> least make folks aware of the site, since I find it useful and maybe others
> would too.
>
> - Chris
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jeff Morriss
> Sent: Fri 11/9/2007 9:10 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Network Sorcery and protocol documentation
>
>
>
>
>
> Maynard, Chris wrote:
>> Recently having submitted a protocol dissector and written a wiki page for
>> it, I was reminded of a very handy web site for protocol documentation that
>> I reference quite often, namely
>> http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/Protocol.htm. I think the folks at
>> Network Sorcery did a really nice job at presenting the protocols. The
>> protocols are alphabetized so they're easy to find, they use a common format
>> for describing them, protocols cross-reference each other where applicable,
>> links to relevant RFC's are provided, related SNMP MIBs are mentioned, etc.,
>> etc.
>>
>> Anyway, I personally think the format is somewhat superior to the current
>> wireshark wiki pages for protocol descriptions and would like to see
>> Wireshark protocol pages mimic theirs. Is it possible to mirror that site's
>> content on Wireshark's site? And then as we add new protocols, we could use
>> a similar format? At the very least, provide a link to it from Wireshark?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> One thought: please don't Reply to an email on one topic and then change
> the subject to something completely different. It makes it hard for
> those of us who read mail in threads (by conversation as Google would
> say it) because your new-subject email shows up as a reply to, in this
> case, the thread about the 0.99.7 release.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you
> are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
> recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
> copies of this message. Also, email is susceptible to data
> corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and
> viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are
> not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering,
> amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
