On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:57:19PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote: > > that I reference quite often, namely > > http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/Protocol.htm. > > The network sorcery pages are a wonderful reference. Our protocol pages > should be geared more toward how the protocol is dissected in Wireshark. > How about we put links to the proper Network Sorcery page on each > Wireshark Wiki page? I don't see a need to duplicate all of the work > they do.
I do: The information is copyright by a company, we'd like to provide a free alternative. From their home page: Our mission statement To create great software products and valuable network information for our customers. So they are in there to their customers, not Wiresharks customers. ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev