Hi,
The X2AP dissector is not working properly until after rev 30772, so you
need to use a buildbot build.
Regards
Anders
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] För Jaap Keuter
Skickat: den 6 november 2009 17:27
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/418
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build
Hello,
this is just something that went through my mind yesterday while working
on the third patch on the same files and without a chance to commit
between the patches. If there is one thing that I don't like (although
I do it sometimes) is to do a commit that does several things at once.
With
Joerg Mayer schrieb:
Hello,
this is just something that went through my mind yesterday while working
on the third patch on the same files and without a chance to commit
between the patches. If there is one thing that I don't like (although
I do it sometimes) is to do a commit that does
Hello,
I had already made the proposal to Gerald some time ago and I'm really ok
with this proposal.
I started using git three years ago and even if the underlying concepts are
slightly different from cvs/svn, once we're used to it, it is not possible
to go back to cvs/svn. I've introduced it
Joerg Mayer wrote:
Hello,
this is just something that went through my mind yesterday while working
on the third patch on the same files and without a chance to commit
between the patches. If there is one thing that I don't like (although
I do it sometimes) is to do a commit that does
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-Win64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-Win64/builds/543
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-win64
Build
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Solaris-10-SPARC on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris-10-SPARC/builds/476
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: solaris-10-sparc
Build
Guy Harris wrote:
On Nov 6, 2009, at 10:09 AM, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=30846
User: gerald
Date: 2009/11/06 10:09 AM
Log:
Add some null pointer checks. This is a blind attempt to fix bug 4155.
Note that
Zinovich, Brock wrote:
Can someone help with this Crash. As stated in subject the crash
appeared after trying 1.2.3. Can no longer run or use.
See below for information on Error. Screenshot of Error Details plus
Text Output of Error Report Contents.
Are you using a Marvell Yukon NIC on
On Nov 7, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
In capture_interface_list we don't set the interface description if we
get an empty string from dumpcap:
if (strlen(if_parts[1]) 0)
if_info-description = g_strdup(if_parts[1]);
Hmm.
Looking at
Hello,
I have a protocol that begins with a PDU of type A ('link' state), then
switches after it performed some negotiation to a PDU type B ('data' state).
I've tried something similar to:
conversation = find_conversation(pinfo-fd-num, pinfo-src, pinfo-dst,
pinfo-ptype, pinfo-srcport,
Joerg Mayer wrote:
Hello,
this is just something that went through my mind yesterday while working
on the third patch on the same files and without a chance to commit
between the patches. If there is one thing that I don't like (although
I do it sometimes) is to do a commit that does
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-ppc on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-ppc/builds/524
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc
Build Reason:
14 matches
Mail list logo
