support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New radius attributes (RFC 4590)
Hi,
Too bad, since the patch doesn't match RFC 4590 table 2.
Care to fix it?
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Did anyone fix this?
Committed revision
Hi,
Too bad, since the patch doesn't match RFC 4590 table 2.
Care to fix it?
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Did anyone fix this?
Committed revision 19266.
Thanks!
Joerg
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:27:43PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Too bad, since the patch doesn't match RFC 4590 table 2.
Care to fix it?
The only thing I could do is to revert the patch. Should I do that?
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
No need, already patched the patch ;)
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:27:43PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Too bad, since the patch doesn't match RFC 4590 table 2.
Care to fix it?
The only thing I could do is to revert the patch. Should I
