I have not tested this so it is purely from memory but I seem to remember that
the "Run" key happens before the logon is complete i.e. no taskbar. Other than
this looking odd and the user not being able to use the OS during the install I
am not sure if it makes a difference. (This may have been
On 10-Nov-13 17:15, Tobias Erichsen wrote:
a.) an administrative one: I have not signed the assignment stuff yet
which I want to do
We need a signed assignment agreement; we can't accept someone
contributing your change as their own--it's still your change.
b.) I must admit to my shame that I
I agree, with the proviso that we add a glossary of resolution terms to the
issue tracker.
Bob Arnson wrote:
On 10-Nov-13 01:55, Rob Mensching wrote:
> Ohhh, I really like that. I also can say "suspended" much easier than "niche"
> (I feel it sounds funny over the mike). I like their explanat
Hi Blair,
two problems about the pull-request:
a.) an administrative one: I have not signed the assignment stuff yet which I
want to do
as soon as possible since I told Rob that I'd want to contribute an extension
to install
software-only (non-pnp) drivers to get rid of my existing CA-dll which
It doesn't matter so much because even if it lies it will still give a
different answer between XP (and downlevel) and Vista (and uplevel) even if we
get behind in the manifests.
Tobias, I vote you put together a pull request for 3.8 soon.
Blair
Tobias Erichsen wrote:
Hi Bob,
would it poss
Hi Bob,
would it possible for you to incorporate my proposed changes in the next RC of
3.8?
I think the changes are not that "severe" and will fix the problem with using
driver-installs
in burn on Windows XP. For all other OS-versions nothing will change...
Best regards,
Tobias
_
Von:
On 31-Oct-13 18:59, Justin Dearing wrote:
> From the technical side of things, there is a nuget package with
> msbuild tasks for building nuget files. So I can generate the
> chocolatey package generation to nuget.pkg.
What's involved in that? It doesn't sound like it would have to be part
of th
On 10-Nov-13 01:55, Rob Mensching wrote:
> Ohhh, I really like that. I also can say "suspended" much easier than "niche"
> (I feel it sounds funny over the mike). I like their explanation *except* for
> the "prime candidate" part. We'd rather people go after Open bugs before
> going after Resolv
On 10-Nov-13 12:07, Bruce Cran wrote:
Since OsGetVersion() uses GetVersionEx(), it might break for Windows
8.1 and newer which I think lie about being Windows 8 -- you're
supposed to use the version helper API now.
Not a problem for Burn: I added the WinBlue compatibility GUID to the
manife
Since OsGetVersion() uses GetVersionEx(), it might break for Windows 8.1 and
newer which I think lie about being Windows 8 - you're supposed to use the
version helper API now.
http://www.osronline.com/ShowThread.cfm?link=247792
"And it continues. I was absolutely gobsmacked to learn that the Ge
...now again with signature disabled as this seems to break the size-limit of
the mailing-list...
Even if the other solution with the named object sounds like the most elegant
version, I'd
would probably go with the simplest (k.i.s.s), as the room for breakage is the
least
(and not being total
Roger Orr was kind enough to review my code, and I've made several commits to
the fork, incorporating fixes based on his comments. I'm still ramping up
on git; please pardon the mess. Enjoy.
-Rob
roberthyang wrote
> The fork URL is as follows :
>
> https://wix.codeplex.com/SourceControl/networ
"For all end users" would mean that 100% of end users don't have the
prerequisite and I think that's far, far from reality.
I believe it is an acceptable experience for the occasional user to be told to
go install a foundational piece of software. For those who don't want that,
they can wrap
13 matches
Mail list logo
