I know that if I define a preprocessor directly in the wixproj file, I can
use it in wxs file just like this: $(var.PROPERTYNAME). However, the problem
with this kind of preprocessor is it is Configuration/Platform specific. We
want to define a SW version number(which needs to be used in wxs file
Hi,
I am using Wix 3.6 with Visual Studio 2012. I am using this section in wixproj
file to harvest required files from ASP.NET MVC application:
Target Name=BeforeBuild
MSBuild Projects=%(ProjectReference.FullPath) Targets=Package
Properties=Configuration=$(Configuration);Platform=AnyCPU
Has there been an improvement regarding this issue? We can use !bind without
any problems from the msi wxs file, but I could not find a way to get
version from the wxi (or from the bundle, if we are able to reference the
version of msi package)?
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
My MBA requires .Net framework to be installed. If .Net is not present the
standard dialog appears with .Net installation confimation.
Is there any way to customize this confimation dialog or just change the logo
image for this dialog?
p.s. I've found that theme of this dialog is in
Found the answer here:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/customizing-burn-prerequisite-boostrapper-image-in-theme-td7205852.html
06.11.2012 14:20, vasjko
Hi,
My MBA requires .Net framework to be installed. If .Net is not present the
standard dialog appears with
See http://wix.sourceforge.net/manual-wix3/light.htm
Section Package Properties
Dirk
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Goran malov...@yahoo.com wrote:
Has there been an improvement regarding this issue? We can use !bind
without
any problems from the msi wxs file, but I could not find a way
Hi Experts, br/
I'm generating a patch using following code:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
Wix xmlns=http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/2006/wi;
PatchCreation
Id=$(var.PatchGUID)
CleanWorkingFolder=yes
OutputPath=PDW_x64_Patch.pcp
Hi,
Can anyone please help me in major upgrade..
Thanks,
Chaitanya.
--
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
I have 2 features. One installs and configures a service. The other
installs the database components. The database components are optional.
So I try to use FeaturesDlg from Wix to collect whether or not to
install the feature. This would work, except I also have a CustomAction
that should run
Chaitanya,
Best place to start is reading the documnetation.
First there is this is from the Wix Documentation
http://wix.sourceforge.net/manual-wix3/major_upgrade.htm
And then there is this from the excellent Wix Tutorial
http://wix.tramontana.co.hu/tutorial/upgrades-and-modularization
Beyond
Hi all,
I have created a managed bootstrapper to install my 2 product msis. I
have peared down the source of this bootstrapper to create a patch
bootstrapper, to install the msp files for these products. Everything works
as expected until I try to install the second patch. It installs along
This should do
InstallExecuteSequence
Custom Action=DBInstall Before=InstallFinalize (DB_FEAT=3) AND
NOT(!DB_FEAT=3)/Custom
/InstallExecuteSequence
Cheers
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Nick (GE Intelligent Platforms) [mailto:nick.mil...@ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November
Yes! Thank you. I did find that I had to wrap it in CDATA.
InstallExecuteSequence
Custom Action=DBInstall Before=InstallFinalize
![CDATA[NOT Installed AND (DB_FEAT=3) AND (!DB_FEAT=3)]]/Custom
/InstallExecuteSequence
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Sharma (AIDC)
Thanks, that worked fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Setting-the-version-number-tp5942903p7581782.html
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is the second bundle version higher? If not, then it doesn't upgrade the
old bundle.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Brian_Covington briancoving...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi all,
I have created a managed bootstrapper to install my 2 product msis. I
have peared down the source of this
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/New-bundle-installs-new-application-doesn-t-upgrade-tp7581742p7581784.html
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
See the DefineConstants here:
http://wix.sourceforge.net/manual-wix3/msbuild_task_reference_candle.htm
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:11 AM, tetelee ttlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that if I define a preprocessor directly in the wixproj file, I can
use it in wxs file just like this:
I wasn't able to find much information about this. Does Burn handle package
ref counting automatically? Is there nothing we need to do? Or should we be
using the DependencyExtension in some way? Do install devs need to handle
adding to the package ref count and subtracting?
Thanks.
--
View
Dirk Ziegelmeier wrote
here is a minimal mergemodule showing the error:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
Wix xmlns=http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/2006/wi;
Module Id=MergeModule Language=1033 Version=1.0.0.0
Package Id={SomeGUID} Manufacturer=ACME InstallerVersion=200 /
I am guessing that you have intentionally do that, in order to allow two
parallel installations of the same application on one PC? In cases where
only one application can exist on one PC, is it possible to deny existence
of parallel applications, so it will always upgrade?
--
View this message
Automatic for MSIs in v3.6 and MSI + MSP in v3.7. Exes need to have a
provider key set for them in the ExePackage. MSUs are weird and I recommend
just making them permanent.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Nick Ramirez nickra...@hotmail.com wrote:
I wasn't able to find much information about
Yes. RTM is 10.00.35.0002, HF1 is 10.00.35.0003, and HF2 is 10.00.35.0004.
The versions are so close together because we are testing, before our release.
I am rerunning the testing rolling the revision number (i.e. 10.00.35.0002,
10.00.36.0003, 10.00.37.0004). I will post the results.
Forgive me, but, I do not quite understand what you are asking. The first
application is dependant upon the second and cannot exist in singular (i.e.
it is built on top of the others' dlls).
--
View this message in context:
23 matches
Mail list logo