On 04-May-12 16:00, Dmuller720 wrote:
> I assume that the ImageSource attribute is what I want to use, but I am not
> sure.
> However, the ImageSource is not recognized and causes an error.
It's not part of any version of WiX I'm aware of. Where did you see it?
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com
On 08-May-12 11:45, Gareth wrote:
> Up until now I have been able to merge VC90 merge modules of both x86 and x64
> varieties into the same package without any problem.
That's legal in an x64 package only.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
-
On 07-May-12 09:51, Dmuller720 wrote:
> But the question is still, can someone help me get a picture as the image
> for a rectangular button?
Use @Bitmap="yes" and @Text="Binary/@Id of bitmap".
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
-
On 11-May-12 04:53, Gareth wrote:
> Hi Bob, thanks for your input, but why would it ever be necessary to include
> 32-bit merge modules in a 64-bit package?
When you have a 64-bit component like a shell extension but everything
else is 32-bit. MSI doesn't support a 32-bit package with 64-bit compo
On 15-May-12 06:34, Pally Sandher wrote:
> at
> Microsoft.Tools.WindowsInstallerXml.Binder.BindDatabase(Output output, String
> databaseFile) in e:\delivery\Dev\wix36_public\src\wix\Binder.cs:line 1582
Definitely a bug, please file. Workaround is to not suppress .wixpdb output.
--
On 15-May-12 10:53, Pally Sandher wrote:
> Done ->
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3526942&group_id=105970&atid=642714
Thanks. Fixed for Monday's build. I am curious, however: Why do you
suppress .wixpdb generation? Is it a question of perf?
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.co
On 17-May-12 20:20, Dave Combs wrote:
> MSI (s) (9C:24) [17:03:39:948]: Component: CMP_162; Installed: Local;
> Request: Absent; Action: Null
That usually indicates something else, expressed earlier in the log, is
preventing the requested action, such as violating the component rules.
Try it in
On 16-May-12 12:52, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> C:\Users\me\libxs\foo.wxs(98) : error LGHT0103 : The system cannot find
> the file 'foo.h'.
See "How To: Specify source files" in wix.chm.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 16-May-12 05:28, Pally Sandher wrote:
> Just don't need them. Never got around to using WiX only for patching so I
> don't see any use for them.
There's nothing in WiX today that needs them, other than patching, but
that might change; there's lots of good info that's pre-digested in a
way tha
On 18-May-12 11:32, Gareth wrote:
> But you can install 64-bit dlls withoin a 32-bit package - they're just
> files.
Not if they're marked as a 64-bit component that goes into a 64-bit part
of the file system. Then they're "special."
> then how can a 64-bit operating system interogate a bespoke f
On 18-May-12 15:53, Richard Mayes wrote:
> Error 0x80004001: Unsupported registry key value type. Type = '7'
> RegistrySearchValue failed: 'SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server',
> HRESULT 0x8000400
Like MSI, Burn doesn't support getting the value of a multi-sz string.
However, if all you want
On 19-May-12 03:54, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> This http://wix.sourceforge.net/manual-wix3/util_xsd_registrysearch.htm says
> that util extension RegistrySearch supports @Format="raw" and mentions
> REG_MULTI_SZ in the @ExpandEnvironmentVariables section but not specifically
> in the Format attri
On 22-May-12 08:22, Pally Sandher wrote:
> 1 - Slipstreaming MSP's doesn't work
Likely a bug. Need logs to know for sure.
> Obviously "Install" isn't what should be happening here. Using the MSI
> directly (circumventing Burn) will bring up the Uninstall process as expected.
What happens if you c
On 23-May-12 13:19, chefkoch wrote:
> hmm , Is there nobody interested in?
I wouldn't say that but it doesn't look easy to get into, even if you
know Python, since you need a bunch of dependencies related to Django.
Plus, of course, it's not exactly geared for Windows developers since
they run t
On 24-May-12 10:02, Pally Sandher wrote:
> However Bob you're incorrect, WiXUI perfectly supports "indirect uninstall
> with full UI". You can run the MSI you used to install the product& you'll
> get that button saying "Uninstall" and the rest of the prompts labelled
> accordingly.
That's main
On 29-May-12 11:58, Pally Sandher wrote:
> Rob M. advised that to do the above with Burn I would have to schedule the
> v2.0 MSI for install& Slipstream the 2.2 MSP since Burn assumes a false
> InstallConditon means "uninstall" rather than "don't install".
Right. You could do this in a custom BA
On 29-May-12 18:35, Nate Hekman wrote:
> While I think I can get that to work, it would be more convenient and would
> end up as a smaller download if I could call the exe that has already been
> installed. Is there some way to do that?
No, Burn doesn't support that.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofs
On 29-May-12 14:19, Rob Mensching wrote:
> The Burn engine will need to elevate to apply per-machine patches.
Would it have to? If MspPackage/@PerMachine="no", would a LUA-compliant
per-machine patch Just Work(tm)?
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
On 30-May-12 11:14, Hoover, Jacob wrote:
> That is the question, though I suspect that it would still need to in order
> to update the bundle's installation information.
I don't think the patch bundle touches the per-machine bundle's
registration. But it would be registered per-user, so it's more
On 30-May-12 11:17, Benjamin Bennett wrote:
> scripts between the msi and the install of sql server. I was hoping to
> use the sql extension in wix but cannot put it in order in the chain.
Put it in the .msi or, if necessary, create another .msi to do it. Burn
is a chainer, not a replacement for M
On 01-Jun-12 12:06, willem peters wrote:
> I am trying to create shortcuts to uninstalling whatever the bootstrapper
You shouldn't. The Windows software logo guidelines used to explicitly
say that; users know how to run Programs & Features to uninstall apps.
> msi property. But i cannot figure ou
On 01-Jun-12 10:09, Michael Scheepers wrote:
> Now I think a small extension is what I need, but I am not sure if the
> extension is packaged to the msi or is only used at compile time (when
> calling candle / light) or also at runtime when it is required.
It can be both but nothing will allow you
On 31-May-12 04:41, Andrey wrote:
> So I have one more question: How to detect if installator was run
> automatically after reboot?
See the resumeType passed in the BOOTSTRAPPER_COMMAND.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 01-Jun-12 15:21, jhennessey wrote:
> bit odd to me. Shouldn't the operation just be "none" for a detect-only
> package with a totally different upgrade code than the current package?
Yes and it's been that way since March. Assuming you're on a later
version, can you post your Upgrade table and
On 03-Jun-12 10:52, Brian C wrote:
> I am getting a new light error while compiling my bootstrapper application:
>
> light.exe(0,0): error LGHT0001: Arithmetic operation resulted in an overflow.
Grab the latest build: A recent fix handles bundles with package content
bigger than 2gb.
--
sig:/
On 03-Jun-12 14:27, Brian C wrote:
> Still fails on 2928 build. We are combining one msi with embedded cab files
> and one msi with external cab files, all totaling 1.78 GB.
Sorry, I forgot that fix missed the RC build. It will be in the next build.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
On 07-Jun-12 06:11, Pasquale Fersini wrote:
> I read the documentation and I tried to load my custom file by
> LocalizationFile
> attribute (of BootstrapperApplicationRef section), but in some fields I still
> see the variables # loc , and, at the end, setup fails. I must say I
That means you'
On 07-Jun-12 11:02, nbr wrote:
> I found that a burn-based installer could be launched in silent-model so it
> should be fairly easy to integrate in a parent MSI install. The challenge
You won't be able to use Burn that way if the bundle contains other
MSIs: MSI doesn't allow you to run another MS
On 07-Jun-12 15:21, Vishnu wrote:
> How to include registry changes in patching ?
They are, if the registry changes are reflected in the upgrade MSI and
the component that contains them is being installed. See a verbose
patch-install log to see what MSI is doing with each component.
--
sig://bo
On 10-Jun-12 13:31, Miss Parker wrote:
> Is there any way to have both .Net 3.5 and .Net 4.0 as prerequisites (by
Yes, just include both in your bundle's chain.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
Live Security Vir
On 11-Jun-12 14:20, Vishnu wrote:
> Install log shows registry is updated from previous (cached) msi values. I
> applied patch using ORCA tool, and didnt find any new registry changes in
> the patch file (msp). Do we need to create a component for each registry
> values and reference it in Componen
On 11-Jun-12 01:07, Kannan24 wrote:
> I found the BootstrapperApplicationData.xml file in extracted location, but
> i cann't see the msi features list.
Feature information is stored only when
MsiPackage/@EnableFeatureSelection="yes".
> 2. How to set the msi property values from class library?
Wha
On 10-Jun-12 13:50, Miss Parker wrote:
> I have a situation where an exe package has a payload file (a text file),
> and for this to work under normal circumstances (without Burn, just double
> click on the exe) the payload file needs to be placed in the same folder as
> the exe.
Have the .exe get
On 12-Jun-12 12:15, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> Comparing the logs it looks like burn is not doing the elevate step.
Is WixBundleElevated set?
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Excl
On 12-Jun-12 11:55, Miss Parker wrote:
> If I do that, then .Net 4.0 won't get installed before the BA GUI starts. Or
> am I missing something? I tried to put both 3.5 and 4 in the Package group
> that's connected to WixMbaPrereqPackageId, but it just crashed.
What crashed? What does the log say?
On 13-Jun-12 13:50, chro...@comcast.net wrote:
> I am trying to create a bundle that includes a 3rd party installer (not much
> control over it). It is an exe, so I created an ExePackage. Now, to uninstall
> that package, it seems like I need to run the unwise.exe that the installer
> put in the
On 13-Jun-12 06:22, Gareth wrote:
> Yes it can.
You can also use a hammer to tighten a screw, but it's not recommended.
The VC9 and VC10 CRTs are very different (VC9 goes into the Fusion GAC;
VC10 doesn't) so it's no surprise they behave differently.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
On 14-Jun-12 14:30, Hoover, Jacob wrote:
> [2DB4:40F8][2012-06-14T12:57:17]: Error 0x80070648: Failed to get product
> info.
Please file a bug; I'll make sure there's a test if there isn't one
already.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
-
On 12-Jun-12 16:13, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> Yes - Variable: WixBundleElevated = 1
>
> Could it be that UAC is disabled therefore it is elevated but it actually
> needs to be an administrator as well?
Right and Burn has logic to handle that state (same as old-school
standard user on XP/2003). Bu
On 12-Jun-12 00:39, Kannan24 wrote:
> How to disable the respective MSI feature from windows form?
Handle OnPlanMsiFeature.
> I mean the "Class library" is like WixBA.dll. I need to set the MSI property
> values from WixBA.dll.
IBootstrapperEngine::SetVariableString.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofset
On 12-Jun-12 11:49, Miss Parker wrote:
> I upgraded to Wix Toolset RC today, and suddenly some MsiPackage elements in
> my bundle generated an error: "Value cannot be null" (Light.exe) There are
Please post the stack trace.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
-
On 14-Jun-12 07:43, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> Are there any changes from build 3.6.3005.0 to 3.6.3013.0 – the history entry
> for this release is empty.
You want v3.6.3014.0, out now.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 19-Jun-12 17:45, victorwhiskey wrote:
> How can I continue logging if during the install I force a reboot, then the
> installer resumes after reboot?
There's no way native to MSI to do that (though it is supported with
Burn). With MSI 4.0 and later, you can use the MsiLogging property but
it w
On 14-Jun-12 19:11, john.burak wrote:
> The docs for the ServiceDependency Element say:
>
> Id: The value of this attribute should be one of the following:
> 1. The name (not the display name) of a previously installed service.
> *2. A foreign key referring to another ServiceInstall/@Id.*
Not sure
On 14-Jun-12 12:12, Bob Uva wrote:
> I'm trying to use the FeaturesDlg in WixUI_Advanced but I cannot get the
> Wix tools (called through Visual Studio) to recognize FeaturesDlg, the xml
> tag. I've tried adding a UIRef tag with the Id="WixUI_Advanced" as
> suggested in the help file, but it still
On 21-Jun-12 13:57, John H Bergman (XPedient) wrote:
> Yesterday, I updated to 3014, and not when I build inside Visual Studio I am
> receiving a whole bunch of ICE30 errors that look similar to this, it appears
> to be about one per project.
Do you get the same error when building from MSBuild o
On 20-Jun-12 11:23, David Watson wrote:
> after a rebuild some binaries that have unchanged code and version numbers
> are not byte by byte identical to the previous version. When I build a test
> patch with some of these binaries they are being included in the msp by the
> torch auto detection me
On 20-Jun-12 17:40, David L. Beckwith wrote:
> I like the button progress bar on installation. Shouldn't it also be used
> during repair and uninstall?
It is, at least on my machine with 3.6.3014.0.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
On 23-Jun-12 20:28, Nick Ramirez wrote:
> Looking at the source code for the extension, that package has the
> DownloadUrl attribute but not the SourceFile attribute, so would that mean
> the user needs to have an internet connection?
Yes.
> Am I right in thinking that
> having a SourceFile attrib
On 22-Jun-12 10:20, Luca Bottari wrote:
> I succeded in the replacement but I don't know how to validate the second
> path in the BrowseDlg and in "Next" button.
That code is only designed to check the WIXUI_INSTALLDIR property.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 22-May-12 08:22, Pally Sandher wrote:
> On a machine which has an existing v2.0 or later MSI installation, the MSP
> should be applied to update to v2.2
> On a machine which has nothing installed, v2.2 should be installed
> On a machine which has an existing installation older than v2.0 a Major
On 25-May-12 09:28, tetelee wrote:
> But how does this dialog get used? There is nothing else related to the disk
> cost dialog,
There is, in src\src\ext\UIExtension\wixlib\CustomizeDlg.wxs.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 24-Jun-12 15:05, John H Bergman (XPedient) wrote:
> I only get these errors inside visual studio, when I build outside,
> everything builds fine.
Try cranking up the verbosity inside Visual Studio and compare command
lines. I can't imagine what would be different, but...
--
sig://boB
http://
On 25-Jun-12 15:29, Rob Mensching wrote:
> GetShortFileName seems to be failing. Not sure how to resolve it. Wonder if
> it is really necessary any longer.
It's used to fix up short paths written by self-reg, so yeah, still
necessary unless we can kill off all code written in the 90s.
--
sig://b
On 26-Jun-12 13:01, Bruce Cran wrote:
> From reading CalculateFeatureAction() it looks like requesting a Local
> state in my BA via OnPlanMsiFeature() should trigger a reinstall, but
> the execute action remains None. Is this broken, or is there something
> I'm missing in the bundle or BA?
The e
On 25-Jun-12 08:06, Luca Bottari wrote:
> Can I assign my path to WIXUI_INSTALLDIR, check for validation e re-assign
> back its value to my variable usign the Order property?
> I would not write custom actions...
I imagine so but I've never tried it.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
On 28-Jun-12 09:10, Brian C wrote:
> More information...
>
> If I pass "/?" on XP or Win7, I get "ignored" as the command line argument.
> If I pass obvious variables (i.e. INSTALLDIR=), then those arguments
> are passed through along with the "ignored" string. The Command.CommandLine =
> "i
On 29-Jun-12 03:03, manishshirsat wrote:
> my bootstrapper app always goes for downloading and installing .net 3.5
> framwork instead of turning on feature.
Nothing in Burn today supports disabling/enabling Windows features.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 01-Jul-12 12:33, Daniel Marjamäki wrote:
> I have a question about file versions. If file versions are not set,
> could that cause my old files to be kept instead of replaced when I
> install a newer version?
You have version info but it's bad data (commit
f1692cdefecdfc36f3754c9d80d68b88ecf25f
On 04-Jul-12 17:16, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> WixUI_Advanced in russian localization carries the text on the button
> Advanced. *Avanced *translated as "*Дополнительно*." This is a correct
> translation. *The problem is the width of a button.* Look at screenshot:
Please file a bug so it doesn't get lo
On 02-Jul-12 16:22, john.burak wrote:
> My installer receives credentials from the user then starts a service under
> them. If the user enters bad credentials or if the specified account
> doesn't have permission to install a Service, the installer rolls back with
> no error message. I think it's
On 02-Jul-12 07:03, Vladimir Kiryazev wrote:
> I am trying to show ErrorDialog required by Windows Installer by means of
> SpawnDialog event. But how can I customize its behavoiur?
> I need it just to close on OK clicked but it exits the installation.
> Is it possible or should I use custom dialog
On 06-Jul-12 12:25, Rob Mensching wrote:
> We cheated for a long time with the wixstdba by using WixVariables before
> finally creating the "pretty face". Looking back, we should have done it
> earlier.
Because now we're stuck with WixVariables. If you do it right from the
beginning, it's a great
On 06-Jul-12 06:34, manishshirsat wrote:
>
>
>
> SourceFile='Resources\netfx35.eula.1033.rtf'/>
Because you're not using a real URL, what you supply for
WixMbaPrereqLicenseUrl has to be the path, not an id.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
On 09-Jul-12 17:26, Darwin Baines wrote:
> You can't build WixStdBA without balinfo.h.
>
> Should it be included in the binary distribution under sdk/inc?
Yes. Please file a bug so it doesn't get lost in e-mail.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
-
On 09-Jul-12 15:13, chro...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> error CNDL0004 : The Variable element contains an unexpected attribute
> 'Overridable'.
The attribute lives in the WixBalExtension namespace, so you need to
prefix it.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
On 13-Jul-12 23:19, Nick Ramirez wrote:
> I guess there's a bug open about this. 3534099.
That bug is resolved. If you need an offline installer, run 'wix36.exe
/layout' on the same machine you downloaded wix36.exe from.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
On 12-Jul-12 20:06, Nick Ramirez wrote:
> What does DiskPrompt and VolumeLabel mean when used on a MediaTemplate
> element?
Nothing. Compile it in a recent build and you'll get your answer.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
On 14-Jul-12 00:13, Nick Ramirez wrote:
> Now it makes sense to me. Have to create the "offline" installer with the
> /layout option and then take that to the offline machine and install it.
Right, so if you're on a dual-homed machine, you download wix36.exe then
run wix36.exe /layout to get the b
On 16-Jul-12 15:22, Ross M. Del Busso wrote:
> I am trying to bundle an msi that prompts for the per-user/per-machine
> assignment.
Burn doesn't support the concept of changing scope at install time. It's
going to pick a scope based on the package at build time.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.co
On 17-Jul-12 06:27, Mueller, Martin C wrote:
> Previously Rob said, that Burn should (arguably) be doing nothing in this
> case (c.f https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29466851)
Right. What's the log say for the plan of the .msi in the related bundle
uninstall of v0.1.0?
--
On 20-Jul-12 07:29, Peter Shirtcliffe wrote:
> Does anyone know how to specify a remote payload in Burn that is an MSI,
> rather than an executable ?
That's not supported today; RemotePayload supports only the fields
needed to verify a downloaded file is what's expected but nothing more
than that
On 23-Jul-12 13:24, mtorkild wrote:
> Did you figure out how to add a button and tie it to a new page? And to
WixStdBA lets you customize the look and feel (via a custom theme) but
not behavior. There's no way to add a new button and have it do
something; WixStdBA isn't extensible today.
--
sig
On 23-Jul-12 11:57, Rune Moberg wrote:
> I have a mergemodule from Sybase (SQL Anywhere 12 ADO.Net provider)
> where the following line exists in the EventMapping table:
> Dialog_ = ProgressDlg
> Control_ = ActionData
> Event = ActionData
> Attribute = Text
That's horrible on several levels.
> In
On 24-Jul-12 08:46, Josh Suereth wrote:
> So where can I find WIX's own installer?
src\Setup\setup.build
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the wa
On 26-Jul-12 08:55, Ing. Tomáš Kubík, Tempo IS wrote:
> Firstly, I cant find a way to set up MsiProperty "on the fly". I need setup
> REINSTALL=ALL only if i reinstall the application.
Burn does that for you during a repair.
> Second question is Minor upgrade or downgrade (only Product version is
On 26-Jul-12 17:46, John M. Wright wrote:
> I'd then just skip the call to Engine.Apply(), thus bypassing the MSI
> installers.
The packages aren't available until Apply is called. Take a look at
ActionState.AdminInstall for the package action to tell Burn to do an
admin install.
--
sig://boB
h
On 26-Jul-12 13:42, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> Is it possible to customise the HyperlinkTheme so that the logo is different
> or hidden on some pages?
Move the Image element to children of the Pages you want it to appear
on. As shipped, it's outside pages, so it always appears.
> By the way, is t
On 25-Jul-12 12:33, Ian Ceicys wrote:
> Here's the log file from the Wix Target's the are executing.
Those aren't WiX targets; they're BTDF targets. You want to talk to them
about why it deletes files.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 29-Jul-12 22:11, Chris Dahl wrote:
> As part of our MSI installer we include the VC100_MFC and VC100_CRT merge
> modules, and we expect them to be written to a SxS location in
> %windir%\winsxs\.
The VC10 runtime switched back to System32; VC9 was the last to use WinSxS.
--
sig://boB
http://
On 27-Jul-12 12:38, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> That sort of works; if I add the image to the Install page it displays
> on that page but not on options but it still displays on Help. If I
> move the image to the Help page it displays on all pages. I have tried
> setting Visible="no" but it still
On 27-Jul-12 06:51, Ing. Tomáš Kubík, Tempo IS wrote:
> But downgrade with "install" mode is doing nothing. If i try "repair" mode,
> the installation failed with this log:
The method Burn uses to repair apparently won't downgrade. I don't see a
workaround so feel free to file a feature request.
On 30-Jul-12 18:59, Chris Dahl wrote:
> My question then is how can I using Wix set the entry to *not* try to
> install the VC10 merge module if it already exists on the system?
1. Worth noting: Merge modules are a build-time concept; once merged,
they lose their identity as a container. It
On 05-Aug-12 03:54, Werner Strydom wrote:
> The call to BalManifestLoad fails and the logs show "Failed to load
> bootstrapper application manifest.".
It also includes an error code that would probably tell you why it failed.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 02-Aug-12 13:09, Hoover, Jacob wrote:
>The one benefit I saw from the AdminInstall/PatchCreation method is I
> could free up disk space by only storing the MSI's and when building the
> patch use a batch file to extract all the MSI's, create the patch, and then
> purge (at the cost of IO
On 08-Aug-12 11:30, Tobias S wrote:
> We use normally the same ProductCode + UpgradeCode for x86 and x64
> packages and exclude them by using a launch condition. (I know not
> Windows Installer recommended but due to sake of simplicity e.g. when
It's not a recommendation; it's a requirement:
"The
On 07-Aug-12 17:23, John M. Wright wrote:
> Did a sourceforge bug get created from the below email? If so, can you
> point me to it so I can monitor it's status? If not, can one be generated?
No. Feel free to file one.
> In my case, I'm performing custom prerequisite checks that require elevated
>
On 08-Aug-12 12:00, Henning Krause wrote:
> Unhandled exception at 0x0FF45EE6 (wixstdba.dll) Setup.exe: 0xC005:
> Access violation reading location 0x0018.
Please file a bug so it doesn't get lost in e-mail.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
On 09-Aug-12 09:02, Henning Krause wrote:
> I have investigated the issue further and come to the conclusion that it
> happens during an upgrade of an existing installation. It tries to do
> something to the existing pacakage and looks up the package in the current
> bundle using its id. When i
http://www.outercurve.org/Blogs/EntryId/58/WiX-joins-the-Outercurve-Foundation
http://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2012/8/14/Outercurve-Foundation-and-WiX-toolset-together-at-last
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
On 14-Aug-12 11:59, MikeR wrote:
> using mutually exclusive component conditions based on detection of ESRI on
> the target system to avoid Windows Installer component rule issues.
If all the components have conditions, WiX throws that message as a
warning, which you could then suppress. If any of
On 8/26/2012 9:47 AM, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> I notice that Microsoft.Tools.WindowsInstallerXml.NAntTasks.dll is not in the
> WiX 3.7 binaries, is NAnt support being dropped from 3.7?
Yes. As 3.7 is pure MSBuild, we don't need NAnt any more and therefore
don't have the assemblies around to crea
On 8/26/2012 7:10 AM, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> operation = BOOTSTRAPPER_RELATED_OPERATION_MAJOR_UPGRADE;
operation is passed in by value, so setting it doesn't give a value back
to the engine. That requires a breaking API change to make it inout.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 8/24/2012 12:29 AM, Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) wrote:
> A .sqlproj is a new project type that can be created after the SQL Server
> Data Tools are installed.
Run 'msbuild /t:GetTargetPath proj.sqlproj' to see if it supports the
stock flow.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 8/26/2012 11:27 AM, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> Thanks, I guess I'll just have to accept same version upgrades are broken.
Same version upgrades? Huh?
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
Live Security Virtual Confer
On 8/26/2012 11:14 AM, Rick Hantz (Hotmail) wrote:
> I had to try several different compatibility settings to get the latest
> weekly RC build to run on Win8 RTM.
> Something wrong here...
Details, please. Worked fine for me.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
-
On 29-Aug-12 09:27, Jeanne Dixon wrote:
> I have attempted to rename the dll I built in the wixstdba directory to be
> WixBalExtension.dll and copied it into my Wix3.6 Toolset directory. When I
> try to build my bootstrapper it gives me an error that the dll could not be
> loaded.
WixBalExtensio
On 29-Aug-12 03:58, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> As far as I am aware you don't need internet access or the original media,
> .NET 3.5 is just a feature that needs enabling.
That was true in Win7 but in Win8 it requires a download from Windows
Update.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
On 26-Aug-12 17:38, Neil Sleightholm wrote:
> Yep - if I am testing a build it is usually based on a fixed release of the
> associated MSI. I know it is odd and I would never really release it to end
> users but it makes sense in a development and I don't see it as that odd out
> here in the rea
On 27-Aug-12 13:32, Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) wrote:
> ShowTargetPath:
>ShowTargetPath: D:\svn\sample\sample\bin\Debug\sample.dll
Does wix2010.targets create any preprocessor variables for the .sqlproj?
It mostly relies on metadata that other targets have set.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofset
801 - 900 of 4751 matches
Mail list logo
