Just to rule anything out.
I'm using Debian Squeeze and I used git-buildpackage with the latest git.
What about your version of libwaster3 and the versions of all of their
dependencies?
libwraster3 == 0.95.0-1
libgif4 == 4.1.6-9
libjpeg62 == 6b1-1
libpng12-0 == 1.2.44-1+squeeze1
libtiff4 == 3.9
On 19/01/12 07:59, GhostlyDeath wrote:
> You may or might not even have the problem, it depends.
>
> It all depends on wherever the image data comes from in from. It could
> already be in the correct order it could not be. If Window Maker uses
> a library for conversion, perhaps Debian changed it
On 19/01/12 01:48, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 at 0:46:26 +0100, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>>
>
> [...]
>
> I skipped your (a bit confusing) motivation.
>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] WPrefs.app: Removing duplicated code
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] WINGs: Removed proplist-compat.h
>>
>
I am for the move, Window Maker has alot of potential and can be
vastly improved. Just don't go C++.
If you do decide to go official, dropping the -crm suffix would show
that you support a new and improved replacement upgraded Window Maker.
I've never been around for NeXT, but I eventually found
You may or might not even have the problem, it depends.
It all depends on wherever the image data comes from in from. It could
already be in the correct order it could not be. If Window Maker uses
a library for conversion, perhaps Debian changed it?
However there could be a detection mechanism. S
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 at 0:46:26 +0100, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
[...]
I skipped your (a bit confusing) motivation.
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] WPrefs.app: Removing duplicated code
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] WINGs: Removed proplist-compat.h
>
> Comments are welcome. I hope the patches could be applied
On 19/01/12 01:03, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> On 19/01/12 00:46, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> here are two patches for WPrefs. My target is renew the menus, because they
>> are not using WINGs and they have a lot of duplicated code.
>>
>> The code in the WINGs library is not good
On 19/01/12 00:46, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here are two patches for WPrefs. My target is renew the menus, because they
> are not using WINGs and they have a lot of duplicated code.
>
> The code in the WINGs library is not good to make menus, because they have
> tools to create m
Hello,
here are two patches for WPrefs. My target is renew the menus, because they are
not using WINGs and they have a lot of duplicated code.
The code in the WINGs library is not good to make menus, because they have
tools to create menu items, but not full menu. On the other hand, WPrefs has
Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> But, I think that the original version should continue in the webpage,
> as historical release, with a link (probably out of the table, to avoid
> confusions).
The 0.92.0 tarball (and older) will continue to be available. I think I
have a copy of the ancient CVS re
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:09:19PM +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> Sorry for not catching that.
>
> I've folded a fix and commited the result to #next (rebasing) and
> also to #master.
>
> Thanks Brad.
No problem.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project wmaker-crm.git.
The branch, master has been updated
via cd1dd471a9dac8959e38ef0036636c471bf82e74 (commit)
via 3c2b3792a6b6a7c
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project wmaker-crm.git.
The branch, next has been updated
discards 0d031dfa4e8df084dc17822508ee897df52f6d45 (commit)
discards ae407c81ae8d8e40b
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:44:24 +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
I think the status quo of Window Maker development (whatever that
means) could be improved if both the Window Maker homepage and the
wikipedia stop saying that the latest "stable" release of Window
Maker is the 6-year-old 0.92.0, which ha
Am 18.01.2012 13:44, schrieb Carlos R. Mafra:
I think the status quo of Window Maker development (whatever that
means) could be improved if both the Window Maker homepage and the
wikipedia stop saying that the latest "stable" release of Window
Maker is the 6-year-old 0.92.0, which has known bugs
Well done Carlos. WindowMaker is getting better and better - it's
clearly not a dead project and people should know about it.
On 18-01-2012 10:44, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
I think the status quo of Window Maker development (whatever that
means) could be improved if both the Window Maker homepage
I think the status quo of Window Maker development (whatever that
means) could be improved if both the Window Maker homepage and the
wikipedia stop saying that the latest "stable" release of Window
Maker is the 6-year-old 0.92.0, which has known bugs (some of them
are fixed in wmaker-crm).
A l
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:09:19 +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 at 10:49:02 -0500, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/wrlib/alpha_combine.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +/* alpha_combine.c - Alpha channel combination, based on Gimp
1.1.24
> + *
> + * Raster graphics library
> +
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 at 10:49:02 -0500, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/wrlib/alpha_combine.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> > +/* alpha_combine.c - Alpha channel combination, based on Gimp 1.1.24
> > + *
> > + * Raster graphics library
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 1997-2003 Alfredo K. Kojim
19 matches
Mail list logo
