http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183
Rainer Meier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Meier ---
C
> >
> > Just one thing that might still behave in a controllable way:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
---snip
>
> I think I am going to implement it.
>
> Would you mind adding it to Bugzilla as an enhancement
> request so it's not "lost
> on the list"? I could do it myself but I prefer the "sponsor"
>
Hi Stefan,
On 04.05.2010 14:38, Pendl Stefan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just one thing that might still behave in a controllable way:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This way one only needs define the common tasks once and can place them at
> the appropriate position before, after or in between the up-/downgrade
On 05/04/2010 08:13 AM, heiko.hel...@horiba.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
I love this idea - this would save lots of copy/paste and
"s/
It seems like a very interesting proposal! (And cutting down on
maintenance burden is a *big win*.)
In fact, the only "problem" I can think of with this so
Hello List
>
>
>
>
>
>
I love this idea - this would save lots of copy/paste and
"s/-
wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/
___
wpkg
Hi all,
Just one thing that might still behave in a controllable way:
This way one only needs define the common tasks once and can place them at the
appropriate position before, after or in between the up-/downgrade command
sequence.
About Java, I have managed to reduce the complexity of
Hello Rainer, Jason, list :)
let me attach my opinion to this discussion.
>
> So I change revision="4" to revision="3.6.3" for Firefox (let's
> assume, for the sake of clarity, that the package revision "4" had
> previously installed Firefox 3.6.2) As far as WPKG is concerned, this
> is a "downgr
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Meier 2010-05-04 09:12:26 CEST ---
Response by Jason Oster:
Seems you're responding to the mailing list, instead of on the bug itself.
I'll take my response here, as well.
On 05/03/2010 02:05 PM, Rainer Meier wrote:
> Hi,
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Meier 2010-05-04 09:10:10 CEST ---
I am sorry, I did not reply on the bug tracker, but I would like to keep the
discussion here:
Hi,
On 03.05.2010 22:12, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.wpkg.org wrote:
> > Where user's upgrade th
Seems you're responding to the mailing list, instead of on the bug
itself. I'll take my response here, as well.
On 05/03/2010 02:05 PM, Rainer Meier wrote:
Hi,
On 03.05.2010 22:12, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.wpkg.org wrote:
(snip)
Correct. WPKG detects upgrades/downgrades always on package
Hi,
On 03.05.2010 22:12, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.wpkg.org wrote:
> Where user's upgrade their own software:
> 1) A package for, say, Firefox 3.5 has been installed by WPKG.
> 2) User installs Firefox 3.6 over top of 3.5; WPKG still thinks 3.5 is
> installed.
> 3) The next time WPKG runs, it will
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183
--- Comment #3 from Jason Oster 2010-05-03 22:11:49 CEST
---
Created an attachment (id=158)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=158)
Debug log showing an already-installed-package failing the installation check
and performing a "re-instal
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183
Rainer Meier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183
Jason Oster changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||parasy...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Jason Os
14 matches
Mail list logo
