Steven Faulkner, from the Accessible Information Solutions (AIS) team, has
developed a free web accessibility checking toolbar for Internet Explorer
http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/toolbar/
The Accessibility Toolbar software contains a range of Tools:
To examine discrete aspects
Windows only unfortunately :(
Peter
Steven Faulkner, from the Accessible Information Solutions (AIS) team, has
developed a free web accessibility checking toolbar for Internet Explorer
http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/toolbar/
The Accessibility Toolbar software contains a range of Tools:
Title: Web Editor?
What Web Editor out there produces the cleanest and most valid code?
- Editor that is embedded in IE (seen it, produces really nasty markup)
- Editor that is embedded in Netscape (no exprience)
- Ektron (used it many years ago, was pretty happy with it)
- .
-
Title: Web Editor?
Happy
new year all! Have kind thoughts for a poor fella who starts work again today
after a short holiday break.
Good question Taco.
Im currently building an online
template based CMS that I have sold to a hosting company. I originally had
grand plans of
Thanks for posting your findings.
htmlArea does allow you to import CSS files via an import(). Of course
this is only useful for editing existing content as there doesn't seem
to be a way to apply a particular style to an element via the UI.
For this reason when using htmlArea we always load up
I'd have to go with you on this one Taco - Ektron's Ewebeditpro
(http://www.ektron.com/web-content-editors.aspx) is currently the best of a
bad lot.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
is that in regards to valid mark-up and cross browser? Or just GUI?
This is an IE/Win only product so not in the cross browser department. The
things I like about this product are the quality of the mark up
customisation tools available.
The entire interface is controlled via an XML file, so
On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 12:24 PM, Mark Stanton wrote:
I'd have to go with you on this one Taco - Ektron's Ewebeditpro
(http://www.ektron.com/web-content-editors.aspx) is currently the best
of a
bad lot.
It certainly isn't cross-browser. Tested under IE5, Safari and Mozilla
for Mac (OS
On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 09:32 AM, Taco Fleur wrote:
What Web Editor out there produces the cleanest and most valid code?
- Editor that is embedded in IE (seen it, produces really nasty markup)
- Editor that is embedded in Netscape (no exprience)
- Ektron (used it many years ago, was
Check out RealObject's edit-on
http://www.realobjects.com/Overview.552.0.html
regards,
Ben
Justin French wrote:
And which one works in most of the browsers?
I've given up on these WYSIWYG editors -- the lack of support on Mac
platforms (in which I spend 99% of my time), and the lack of standards
I believe that for quotes it's handy to use the
entities because you define proper opening and closing
quotes, instead of using the uni-directional default
as defined on the keyboard.
It's probably safest to use entities in all your text,
as then they have no way of conflicting with the
actual
On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 02:20 PM, Universal Head wrote:
A quick HTML Entities question. For a closed single quote, for
example, is it better to use
rsquo;
or
#8217;
- and what is the distinction?
I can't answer your specific case, but I *can* paraphrase it with an
example of my
What's the technical difference between the two options? Are the
numeric entities the original form and the typographical ones more
recent?
The reason this came up is that I've been using the numeric ones, and
then I started using skEdit which is an excellent coding tool, but
uses the
On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 04:12 PM, Universal Head wrote:
What's the technical difference between the two options? Are the
numeric entities the original form and the typographical ones more
recent?
The reason this came up is that I've been using the numeric ones, and
then I started
rsquo; is an alternate (easier to remember) code than the official
unicode definition of #8217. All possible characters have a specific
number assigned to them in Unicode. The lettered helpers came out after
unicode was out to ease the pain of having to remember a set of digits
that had
Dreamweaver currently produces the cleanest and most valid code, and is
one of the most polished WYSIWYG editors out there. Zeld's cronies
worked with Macromedia to bring the program up to date with handling
standards. It does the job pretty well. I don't use the visual design
view all too
16 matches
Mail list logo
