Re: [WSG] List Item Background Disappearing in IE

2004-06-23 Thread Natalie Buxton
Oh, also IE doesnt like images under 1k in size. Try to make your bullets a little over 1k and see if that does the trick. Nataie :) On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:34:25 +1000, Andrew Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've googled and discovered that yeah it's a known bug, Im just wandering if

Re: [WSG] List Item Background Disappearing in IE

2004-06-23 Thread Natalie Buxton
Oh, also IE doesnt like images under 1k in size. Try to make your bullets a little over 1k and see if that does the trick. Nataie :) On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:27:12 +1000, Natalie Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hve you tried adding: list-style: inside; or list-style: outside; I

Re: [WSG] Accessibility in FLASH MX 2004

2004-06-23 Thread Tim Lucas
ckimedia spoke the following wise words on 23/06/2004 10:36 AM EST: Before dashing the XHTML/CSS solution to my interface execution, how robust is the accessibility feature in MX 2004? The interface must be as 508 compliant as possible. A quick google for Flash 2004 accessibility found a couple

[WSG] Response to Recommended Books Feedback

2004-06-23 Thread Jamie Mason
Title: Message Hey Guys, Thanks for all your recommendations, they were all really helpful. Some of them we have already, butI've put together a list from the new suggestions and others I found and have put forward the following shortlist; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [WSG] Site Check

2004-06-23 Thread Michael Donnermeyer
Not seeing anything weird in Safari 1.2.2, nor anything weird on Firefox .9 (Mac). On Jun 21, 2004, at 07:08, Peter Costello wrote: Hi, Ive been trying to get my head around standards based design and am putting together a personal site. Ive used the suckerfish menu, but am having a wierd

[WSG] W3C XForms Workshop

2004-06-23 Thread webstandards
Hey everyone I attended the W3C Xforms workshop held in Sydney (just the 2nd of the 2 workshops on offer today) and really amazed at what I saw. It's a shame that current support for Xforms is poor, but thinking of all the possibilities it could bring. Validation all performed without JavaScript

[WSG] Free presentation for Sydney WSG members and their bosses

2004-06-23 Thread russ - maxdesign
As a preview to WE04, Web Essentials and the Web Standards Group will be hosting a free briefing in Sydney for executives and decision makers, addressing the business issues associated with web standards and accessibility. In other words, we want you to bring your bosses along for a short

[WSG] Unsubscribe

2004-06-23 Thread Paulo Rodrigo Teixeira
Yahoo! Mail - Participe da pesquisa global sobre o Yahoo! Mail. Clique aqui!

Re: [WSG] Unsubscribe

2004-06-23 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
He has a good valid point. - Original Message - From: Paulo Rodrigo Teixeira To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 3:14 AM Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [WSG] Unsubscribe Yahoo! Mail - Participe da pesquisa global sobre o

Re: [WSG] Free presentation for Sydney WSG members and their bosses

2004-06-23 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
I hate asking this :P Can you setup a couple of nights over here in NZ and do it aswell I know plenty of people who would love to go see it. Camz (aka t94xr) http://www.t94xr.net.nz/ Taupo NZ XHTML CSS Webdevelper (PHP Newbie) - Original Message - From: russ - maxdesign [EMAIL

Re: [WSG] Accessibility in FLASH MX 2004

2004-06-23 Thread ckimedia
Hi, Thanks On Wednesday, June 23, 2004, at 01:45 AM, Tim Lucas wrote: ckimedia spoke the following wise words on 23/06/2004 10:36 AM EST: Before dashing the XHTML/CSS solution to my interface execution, how robust is the accessibility feature in MX 2004? The interface must be as 508 compliant as

[WSG] :before Pseudo Element

2004-06-23 Thread ckimedia
Hi, I a bit of a pickle, I attempting to use the :before Pseudo element to insert an en dash before a p class=dialogueblah blah/P, but have ran aground, wisdom welcome. C * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

[WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread Razvan Pop
Hello. I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you think? Should I continue? * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
HELL YEAH!!! - Original Message - From: Razvan Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:58 AM Subject: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory Hello. I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web Directory where

RE: [WSG] :before Pseudo Element

2004-06-23 Thread Iain Gardiner
Do you have any more background than this? The CSS you are applying, for example. Letting us know which browsers you are using would also help. If you are using IE, then that's the problem. Its support for generated content is pitiful if not non-existant. Iain -- Iain

RE: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread Ted Drake
Great idea, I'd love to submit a few sites and at the same time would be more likely to support those sites that make the effort to be compliant. Could you also give the option of listing a star or some other symbol for sites that are accessible? Ted www.superiorpixels.com -Original

Re: [WSG] :before Pseudo Element

2004-06-23 Thread ckimedia
Hi, Target browsers include Safari, Mozilla, Firefox, the standards posse and perhaps IE 5 mac. As for the CSS P.dialogue:before {content: mdash; } On Wednesday, June 23, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Iain Gardiner wrote: Do you have any more background than this? The CSS you are applying, for example.

Re: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread Mordechai Peller
Razvan Pop wrote: I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you think? Should I continue? Interesting idea. If you do so, you'll need to recheck validity on a regular basis. In which case, you should do

RE: [WSG] :before Pseudo Element

2004-06-23 Thread Iain Gardiner
Hi, Well your code in the examples you've given is inconsistent. In the first post you open a p tag but close with /P. If you're using XHTML, it is case sensitive and does not see these two as connected. Also in the CSS example, you've put a capital P. This may be the problem. Try changing

Re: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread Kay Smoljak
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:58:25 +0300, Razvan Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you think? Should I continue? I think it's a great idea. However, rather than only sites

Re: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread Jad Madi
hi Russ have a post on this list check list for development I'v post it in my personal blog http://www.jadmadi.net/site/index.php?p=21 I'm not sure if you can search for it in this list archive. On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:46:25 +0800, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 23 Jun 2003

[WSG] something for your managers and clients

2004-06-23 Thread John Allsopp
Hi all, if you'd like a taste of the kind of thing your boss or client will hear at the briefing next week http://we04.com/briefing.cfm then I've just posted 5 things you should ask your web development team http://www.westciv.com/style_master/house/good_oil/5_questions/ index.html John

[WSG] IE linked image border grief

2004-06-23 Thread Justin French
Hi all, I have the following rules (amongst many): a { text-decoration: none; } a:link { border-bottom: 1px dotted black; } a:visited { ... } a:hover { ... } No surprises so far -- it's a classic dotted border on links. The problem I have is that IE

Re: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread Chris Stratford
Off topic etc... But this email is dated on my machine as the 24th June 2003... What the hell?!?! Razvan Pop wrote: Hello. I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you think? Should I continue?

Re: [WSG] something for your managers and clients

2004-06-23 Thread Neerav
A small error in the URL (an errant space) may cause the url to wrap in some email clients, below is a working URL http://www.westciv.com/style_master/house/good_oil/5_questions/index.html -- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development IT consultancy Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27

Re: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread Lea de Groot
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:53:19 +1000, Chris Stratford wrote: But this email is dated on my machine as the 24th June 2003... Razvan computer has the date set incorrectly. Its quite common. People, could we please not clutter the list with this sort of thing? If you have an issue with the

[WSG] web standards related rss feeds?

2004-06-23 Thread Neerav
I have recently become a fan of RSS feeds as an efficient way to trawl the net for interesting news and articles, and would appreciate knowing which web standards related rss feeds you read Here are 3 good ones Ive found to start off with: http://www.alistapart.com/rss.xml

[WSG] Re: web standards related rss feeds?

2004-06-23 Thread Neerav
PS for those who dont know what RSS is there is a great explnation at http://www.mnot.net/rss/tutorial/ and self promotion http://www.bhatt.id.au/article/1/ /self promotion will explain how to generate an rss feed using PHP MySQL :-) -- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development IT

Re: [WSG] web standards related rss feeds?

2004-06-23 Thread John Allsopp
Neerav, I have recently become a fan of RSS feeds as an efficient way to trawl the net for interesting news and articles, and would appreciate knowing which web standards related rss feeds you read I agree 110%. RSS will change the way you use the web. Dog Or Higher is

Re: [WSG] [THREAD CLOSED] Re: web standards related rss feeds?

2004-06-23 Thread Mark Stanton
Hi Neerav I think this is an excellent idea I've got lots of great feeds that I'd like to share I'm sure others do to. The reason I'm closing it is because I don't think the list is the best place for this resource - I'd like to find somewhere more permanent on the site for it. I'm going to

Re: [WSG] web standards related rss feeds?

2004-06-23 Thread Chris Blown
http://www.sitepoint.com/syndication/ On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 10:45, Neerav wrote: I have recently become a fan of RSS feeds as an efficient way to trawl the net for interesting news and articles, and would appreciate knowing which web standards related rss feeds you read Here are 3 good

Re: [WSG] Re: web standards related rss feeds?

2004-06-23 Thread Mark Stanton
Hey All I've creaked a Standards related feeds category in the resources on section on the site - http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat32. Feel free to add links to RSS Atom feeds there. I've taken the liberty of adding the ones already posted to this thread under the names of those who

RE: [WSG] Formatting a list

2004-06-23 Thread Willemot Michaël
I asked for help too early, I found it myself now. Had to add a width to the sub-menu ul and li Any improvements on the css still welcome! greetz -- Willemot Michaël http://www.sotto.be -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Willemot Michaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag

[WSG] Accessability testing

2004-06-23 Thread James Cowperthwaite
Hi - does anyone still use Bobby these days? I ask because we really have only used: Cynthia Says - Web Content Accessibility Report (http://www.contentquality.com/) On a site we are developing we pass all Checklist items up to and including Priority 3 Verification with Cynthia, however our