Chris wrote:
Has any knowledgeable soul read: Web Standards Design Guide
(Internet Series)
No and I am not racing out to order it either.
I am slowly reading Kevin Ruse's previous book in that series - XML for Web
Designers Using Macromedia Studio MX 2004 and while I learning a bit about
Hello.
I have a question. I've been doing a lot of multi-lingual sites lately,
and I usually separate them into individual sites based on language, and
indicate so properly in the code.
However, one of my clients wants two languages integrated into one site
(basically two languages, one
G'day
However, one of my clients wants two languages integrated into one site
(basically two languages, one next to the other, but in different
colors). My question is, how do I code this so that it makes sense? For
individual languages sites, I add:
lang=en xml:lang=en (changing the
ADMIN
Please remember a few basic guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
- Trim replies where possible
- Code samples are fine, but not full pages of html or css code - much
better to link to these items
The last post was a prime candidate for trimming AND linking!
Russ
Ah, I see. What about mixing languages in the KEYWORDS and DESCRIPTION?
Is that a problem?
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Design
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 5/30/2005 10:00 AM Bert Doorn said the following:
G'day
However, one of my clients wants two
Guys n' gals,
What would be the best way to mark-up something like:
All the best,
Tatham Oddie
They aren't really separate paragraphs so this is wrong:
pAll the best,/p
pTatham Oddie/p
This just looks hideous:
p
All the best,br /
john wrote:
Ah, I see. What about mixing languages in the KEYWORDS and DESCRIPTION?
Is that a problem?
From http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-META :
-
META and search engines
A common use for META is to specify keywords that a search engine
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:06 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote:
This just looks hideous:
p
All the best,br /
Tatham Oddie
/p
Really? That's a shame, because I have a feeling that's correct.
They're not in separate paragraphs, but they are on separate lines,
Oh, duh. If all else fails, read the W3 specs. If that doesn't work?
Follow them.
Thanks again.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Design
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 5/30/2005 11:08 AM Bert Doorn said the following:
john wrote:
Ah, I see. What about
Guys n gals,
I have a fairly hardcore CSS implementation in the
works and its almost there. However, Im having a few minor
bugs. Guess where? Did I hear you say IE6Win? *applause*
Basically:
The cap on the bottom block
is positioned incorrectly.
Any text in the bottom block,
I'd have to agree. It's not a list, and shouldn't be marked up as one.
It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty
straight-forward if you ask me.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Design
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 5/30/2005 11:10 AM Joshua
The whole notion that it should be marked up as a list kind of reminds
me of this post...
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2005/03/31/too_far/index.php
I think we're all in danger of doing that!
Josh
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 12:17 +0100, john wrote:
I'd have to agree. It's not a list, and
Ok... Thanks for your help. I was just checking there wasn't some funky
über-geeky new way of doing it... If I'm smacking all my neighbours and
clients over the head about semantic mark-up I want to make sure I'm doing
it properly.
Thanks,
Tatham Oddie
Technical Director, Fuel Advance
Hello John,
See
http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/en/all.html#Slide006
0 and
http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-lang/#ri20040728.121358444
The lang and xml:lang attributes can and should only specify one language at
a time, as they indicate the language of the text you
What would be wrong with doing something like this?
h3Comment Title/h3
p
Posted by foobar on foobar
/p
div
p
Comment text
/p
/div
On 5/30/05, Andrew Krespanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, well if the blockquote approach is considered overkill, you'll
choke on what I actually use for my
FWIW, my personal preference within a CSS file is to group all the
properties relating to a particular selector into a single declaration.
I've seen many people declare properties for, say, p in multiple locations.
That makes it difficult to get a complete picture of the styles applied for
p.
I
What would be wrong with doing something like this?
h3Comment Title/h3
p
Posted by foobar on foobar
/p
div
p
Comment text
/p
/div
Nothing 'wrong', as such. The div surrounding the 'comment text'
paragraph is superfluous and could be dropped, but semantically it's
pretty sound.
The
Hi,
Will pass on this one. Thanks.
C
On May 30, 2005, at 12:39 AM, Nick Cowie wrote:
Chris wrote:
Has any knowledgeable soul read: Web Standards Design Guide
(Internet Series)
No and I am not racing out to order it either.
I am slowly reading Kevin Ruse's previous book in that
Jack Saat schrieb:
I have a really Junk code page you can view on
http://www.extraheight.com/ and need to make this code
standards-compliant. But want keep the same layout minus of course the
clear view problems. There is so much junk in the code and I do not
know where to start. :(
From the
Drop it all and start from scratch, the layout is quite simple.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Tatham Oddie wrote:
I have a fairly hardcore CSS implementation in the works and its
almost there. However, Im having a few minor bugs. Guess where? Did I
hear you say IE6Win? *applause*
The URL is: http://testdrive.whatcanido.com.au/
Optimisation hasnt been started yet so dont complain too
SAUD _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what on earth
I will fuck you
soon
I am sorry
Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site!
Hi,
Pardon me if I'm missing the joke. But I get enough junk mail, so I
can do without obscenities coming from sources I rely on as support
for my livelihood.
Thank You
On May 30, 2005, at 2:41 PM, SAUD _ wrote:
SAUD _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what on earth
ADMIN THREAD CLOSED
This list does not allow swearing - as clearly indicated in the guidelines.
The offender was unsubscribed and blocked.
Please do not reply to this or other obscene messages onlist.
If you have a problem with a post or a closed thread, please email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - do not
On 5/30/05 4:49 AM Rowan Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
What would be wrong with doing something like this?
h3Comment Title/h3
p
Posted by foobar on foobar
/p
div
p
Comment text
/p
/div
The only thing I can think of is: are you aware of the origin of fubar
(which is the
That may be because most people don't know it's an acronym. Foobar IS
F.U.B.A.R.
Christie Mason
-Original Message-
Rick Faaberg
The only thing I can think of is: are you aware of the origin of fubar
(which is the correct spelling of foobar)?
It's totally weird how usage of fubar has
The discussion of Definition lists for comments in blogs has been a
great so far.
Please don't stray off-topic.
Ben
WSG Core
That may be because most people don't know it's an acronym. Foobar IS
The only thing I can think of is: are you aware of the origin of fubar
Foobar IS F.U.B.A.R.
It isn't, it's only derived from it. See http://kb.iu.edu/data/aetq.html
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
28 matches
Mail list logo
