On 10-May-08, at 6:29 AM, Laert Jansen wrote:
well, I´d like to know what´s the right way to embed a flash file
into the html without tables. The flash file is 100% width and height.
Have you looked at SWFObject [1]? It has worked well for me in the past.
Best,
- Rahul.
[1] http://code.goo
I have a dropdown menu in unordered list, and I wanted it to shows
only first and second level but display none starts from third level,
yetI can't figure how to do it or it simply doesn't work.
When I put the display none to second level:
#nav li ul {display: none;}
it works and all sublev
Hello everyone.
well, I´d like to know what´s the right way to embed a flash file into the
html without tables. The flash file is 100% width and height.
Thanks a lot
Laert
--
Laert Jansen
www.laertjansen.com
***
List Guidelines:
On 9 May 2008, at 23:00, Krystian - Sunlust wrote:
Hi Rick,
I would give title to the link as the name of the organisation, since
the link leads there, and then the alt of the image as this company is
a member of the organization, because that's the reason that you show
this image and that's it
Hi Rick,
I would give title to the link as the name of the organisation, since
the link leads there, and then the alt of the image as this company is
a member of the organization, because that's the reason that you show
this image and that's it's meaning.
Regards,
--
Krystian - Sunlust
Freelanc
Hi, I'm just finishing up a footer for a site need to include a couple
of 'membership badges', y'know the kind of thing: a GIF denoting
membership of a trade body, with the image linked to the body's website.
This creates several attributes which could be seen either as
complimentary or con
Rob Kirton wrote:
I'd be highly surprised if a screen reader manages to read CSS. Most
struggle with HTML
But the screen reader doesn't need to read the CSS, as the DOM already
makes it quite clear where each link starts/stops, and screen readers
can easily distinguish between them even wit
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Kirton
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 7:00 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] The Problem of adjacent links
>
> Darren
>
> I'd be highly surprised if a screen reader manages to read CSS. Most
> struggle with H
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adam Martin
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:13 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] :: CSS Code Formatting ::
>
> We use a very similar approach - php to deliver the css.
> This all
Yeah you're quite probably right. I just thought i'd read that somewhere
recently. Must have been for something else!
Cheers,
Darren
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Kirton
Sent: 09 May 2008 15:00
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] The
On 8 May 2008, at 22:50, Michael Horowitz wrote:
I don't think it is worth the time an effort to support old browsers
like IE 5.
Agreed. I go back as far as IE6 because last time I checked my site
logs just over 44% of IE users were using that version (with just over
55% using v7). IE5 a
Darren
I'd be highly surprised if a screen reader manages to read CSS. Most
struggle with HTML
--
Regards
- Rob
Raising web standards : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Linking in with others : http://linkedin.com/in/robkirton
2008/5/9 Darren Lovelock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The content:after pseudo
The content:after pseudo class can be used to seperate the links with a
vertical bar.
It wont work in Internet Explorer but I believe it will still work with
screen readers (although at this point in time I cannot find anything that
confirms this).
That said, it's far more logical to just sepe
The rationale for this checkpoint seems to have been long forgotten, and I
don't know of any user agent that has a problem with adjacent links. Nor
does anyone else it seems, which is why the WCAG Samurai recommended that
the checkpoint should be ignored.
It certainly isn't a problem for any scre
"The reason for putting the character there in the first place is
explicitly to help screen-reader users distinguish between links."
It is my understanding that the fact that they are seperate links is what
distinguishes between links ...
"Screen-reader users have said that the vertical bar is T
The reason for putting the character there in the first place is
explicitly to help screen-reader users distinguish between links.
Screen-reader users have said that the vertical bar is THEIR preferred
character (even though this means repeating "vertical bar") since it is
not used for anything el
16 matches
Mail list logo