We have a problem! Outlook 2010, according to Campaign Monitor [1], is
going to continue to use the crippled MS Word layout engine. They adopted
this as the status quo for
Outlook 2007 and promptly set rich email with CSS, etc., back a number
of years, and are showing no great sign of diverging
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Joshua Street josh.str...@gmail.comwrote:
We have a problem! Outlook 2010, according to Campaign Monitor [1], is
going to continue to use the crippled MS Word layout engine. FixOutlook.org
aims to collate the community's discontent with this decision using
On 24/06/2009, at 9:58 PM, Matthew Pennell wrote:
This is so stupid - the reason that Outlook uses Word instead of a
decent rendering engine is because of the same standards advocates
complaining so much about IE6 being bundled with Windows! You can't
have your cake and eat it too...
You
Nathan,
I think you are slightly missing the point, I for one don't care too
hoots if microsoft uses its own rendering engine or not. All I care is
that they use one that works and I think this is the main point of the
campaign. I pretty much left web design a few years back because I
Hi Jens,
Sorry for replying so late, just wondering if you found a solution?
The only things I have found online have been to make .Net produce an
input type=image / which isn't ideal (the image is in the HTML, not
the CSS), or a Linkbutton to then format with CSS more easily. I
believe that
On 24/06/2009, at 11:40 PM, Andrew Stewart wrote:
I think you are slightly missing the point...
You might want to re-read (or read) my email.
I was responding to Matthew, who was implying that Microsoft's
decision to use Word as the rendering engine was due to Opera's
complaint to The
Michael MD wroted:
WHY do I have to stuff around with regedit to be
able to do view source in current versions of
Outlook?
Can you pass on that trick? I would love to be able to view source...
--
The generation that took acid to escape reality is now taking antacid to deal
with reality
On Behalf Of Rachel Radford
Sent: 24 June 2009 14:51
Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: Using background images on submit buttons
I fear the only proper solution while using .Net is for the HTML that is
produced to change!
Rachel, have you had a look at the CSS control adapters
I have been following this thread with interest. Some fonts are thicker
than others. You have character spaceing. For example, Arial Narrow
takes up less room than Arial and Arial black. I have come across some
low vision individuals that only rquire thicker fonts and a little more
spacing
Angus MacKinnon related:
Internet Explorer defaults to a 12 point font and
Firefox defaults to a 16 point font.
Of course, fonts are adjustable in the browser (with some exceptions for hard
coded fonts) so a user's preferences may be an override in many cases.
--
I made magic once. Now,
On 24/06/2009, at 9:58 PM, Matthew Pennell wrote:
...the reason that Outlook uses Word instead of a decent rendering
engine is because of the same standards advocates complaining so
much about IE6 being bundled with Windows!
Microsoft have since responded to the campaign [1] and thrown this
Heya,
We've found a really strange issue with some CSS layout when serving a page
with XHTML 1.0 Transitional vs. XHTML 1.1 (or XHTML 1.0 Strict), in Firefox 3,
Safari IE8. The exact same behaviour is seen using the HTML 4.01 versions of
the doctypes too.
From what I've
12 matches
Mail list logo
