My 2 cents,
Your approach towards IE6 should be dictated by your site's audience.
Watch your stats. If you have a lot of IE6 visitors, don't they deserve
a decent page? If they're potential customers, wouldn't you want them to
go through and make a transaction?
Think of the poor people using
- Original Message -
From: "Erickson, Kevin (DOE)"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 7:51 AM
Subject: RE: [WSG] disallow IE6 to load the main style sheet
Yes. Thank you Felix! "best viewed" works much better. And then throw in
the fact that IE 6 was first release around 2001 and as
Any one developing Mobile Web has an insight for jQuery Mobile?
I was studying the framework last night, couldn't quite decide whether it's
best to adapt it to my mobile web development. After reading the documentation
and tested all demos, my impression is, it's more geared towards Apps.
The A
On 20.12.2010 21:00, David McKinnon wrote:
Sorry Georg,
I should have read your article before (re)using that joke!
I still not sure I'd spend extra effort to effectively penalise IE6 users.
IE6 is not Netscape 4, its CSS support is not that bad.
...
I just realised I'm sticking up for IE6!
Mu
On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2010/12/20 13:13 (GMT-0500) Erickson, Kevin (DOE) composed:
>
>> I like the "let it fail gracefully" method. And, using something like
>> , display a message for IE 6 only, "You are using IE 6.
>> Please upgrade your browser to view this sit
Yes. Thank you Felix! "best viewed" works much better. And then throw in
the fact that IE 6 was first release around 2001 and ask them if they
even care if they can see a site in a "best viewed" fashion. I am
thinking they are not. ;-) j/k.
All's good.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webst
On 2010/12/20 13:13 (GMT-0500) Erickson, Kevin (DOE) composed:
I like the "let it fail gracefully" method. And, using something like
, display a message for IE 6 only, "You are using IE 6.
Please upgrade your browser to view this site correctly."
"Correctly"? Do all compliant browsers do corre
Sorry Georg,
I should have read your article before (re)using that joke!
I still not sure I'd spend extra effort to effectively penalise IE6 users.
IE6 is not Netscape 4, its CSS support is not that bad.
...
I just realised I'm sticking up for IE6!
Must be the payback for all the nasty things I'
IE6 would not load the stylesheet if set up the line of HTML like this:
Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Web Designer / Developer/
--
Sites by Joe, LLC
/"Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design"/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Web: http://sitesbyjoe.com
Email: j...@sitesbyjoe.co
http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css/
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:20 AM, tee wrote:
> I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage
> has fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a broken page due to
> no special treatment
I like the "let it fail gracefully" method. And, using something like
, display a message for IE 6 only, "You are using IE 6.
Please upgrade your browser to view this site correctly."
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf
On 12/20/10 6:57 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Using IE conditional comments on the html tag, you can target each
version
of IE.
You can does not mean you should...
In a comment [1] on "forabeautifulweb", Molly Holzschlag says:
"Please, please don’t design for browsers."
[1]
http://forabeaut
> Using IE conditional comments on the html tag, you can target each version
of IE.
You can does not mean you should...
In a comment [1] on "forabeautifulweb", Molly Holzschlag says:
"Please, please dont design for browsers."
[1]
http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_exp
Paul,
thank you very much! Very neat!
Had a deja vu moment when I saw the title, I might had stumbled on that article
before.
If I were to find the article in 2009 it probably wasn't worth the
consideration due to IE6 usage at that time, but it's prime time to start using
this technique now
We all go through this every holiday season Nick.
Look at the big picture.
Russ provides us with a great resource. For free.
1st auto responder message, and you are gone. Guilty until proven
guilty.
Just look at the first line, or header, then delete.
That's the deal. And Russ could charge.
He
I have an appointment this morning but will be back in the office by 12.30.
If your matter is urgent please contact Sam Lawry, (03) 269 0279.
Regards
David Linden
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
You know, we're all honestly glad that you've been able to get away for your
season's holidays and everytime a post you've linked to comes up we get
reminded of it yet again. Please people, change your list settings "BEFORE"
you go away so that we don't all get jealous while we're stuck here sl
I will be out of the office until January 3rd, 2001. If you have an urgent
matter contact Dan at d...@inetsgi.com or dial 402.330.0636 x1002.
Thank you.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Uns
Seconded.
N
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Nicholas Bower
Sent: 19 December 2010 07:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest
Hi Mods can you possibly drop emails from list and digest with subjec
19 matches
Mail list logo