Re: [WSG] HTML5 v. HTML 4.x

You can use it, but will anyone benefit from it? Assistive technologies don't support much, if any, of the new semantics. I don't know if search engines and other users of programmatic access to websites are currently able to make use of HTML5 markup, but I have not seen anything to

Re: [WSG] Aside and section

Is it ok to nest section elements inside the aside element? Can't come up with anything about this scenario on Google... Hi. The section element represents a generic section of a document or application. A section, in this context, is a thematic grouping of content, typically with a

Re: [WSG] HTML5 v. HTML 4.x

Could someone please clarify this for me. I realise that HTML5 has introduced new semantic elements such as header, aside etc., but does this really increase the expressive power of the markup? Can't the same thing be achieved in HTML 4.x using classes (e.g. p class=header)? I am

Re: [WSG] HTML5 v. HTML 4.x

I use HTML5 as my doctype, but I don't use the new tags. It's wise to be very concerned about backwards compatibility. Are they more semantic - I suppose. If IE doesn't understand the new tags I'd leave them be until another day. Hi. Is the backwards compatibility really a problem? What

[WSG] Is there any way to clone HTML5 node in IE 6-8?

Hi, Is there any way to clone new HTML5 elements in IE6-8? I add script !--[if lt IE 9] script src=http://html5shiv.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/html5.js;/script ![endif]-- But when I try to use .cloneNode(true) or jQuery .clone, all HTML5 elements disappears. .innerHTML show that nav/nav turn to

Re: [WSG] Is there any way to clone HTML5 node in IE 6-8?

...@webstandardsgroup.org В *** -- С уважением, Ворон. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org