Why not just use clearfix?
On Nov 12, 2007 12:15 PM, David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:58:37 -0600, Likely, James A. wrote:
Hello,
I am curious to see how others clear floats.
*Sometimes* I find this works:
#parent {overflow: auto;}
This does require
I have to agree. Not everything has to be so damn usable that it has no
visual flair, something that, sadly, tends to be the norm on this list. This
is neat if only because it's quite unique.
On 10/29/07, Olly Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/07, Rob Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come off it. Under no circumstance has it ever cost us more to do it right
than to do it poorly; shoddy workmanship always results in higher costs. If
it is costing you too much to do it right, you are doing more than just your
coding wrong.
On 10/25/07, Michael Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
works...
change
#sidebar a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}
to
#sidebar li a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}
add the li so it only applies to links inside the
Lex parsimoniae.
Cheers.
On 10/23/07, Chris Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Wilson wrote:
Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
works...
that statement isn't correct because this also works:
#sidebar .one-image a:hover {
border: 1px
McLaughlin, Gail G wrote:
We always ask the client if they require that the site comply
with accessibility. The response ranges from What is
accessibility? to we'll worry about that later to No!
So you build poor sites unless specifically told to build them to standards?
Ouch.
A private company should be able to do whatever the hell they like. Suit is
without merit and frivolous. What's next, suing vehicle manufacturers for
not providing a braille manual? I'm all for accesability, but there is no
reason it should be mandated, and lack of is in no was discriminatory.
Better yet, since not everyone can see, lets require all publications to
include a braille copy, all musical artists to provide a written transcript
of ever performance. That would of course be madness...
Why should a different standard be applied to the web?
On 10/3/07, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL
...
Cat
On 10/3/07, Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or do you think that your right to 'do what the hell you like'
outweighs other people's right to be treated equally?
Be treated equally? They have to CHOOSE to visit the site. So, because
they want (want need)to do
If you are going to argue for standards and accesability, follow your own
advice first. Captain table layout over here. You don't even have alt tags
on your images. Hypocritical aren't ya?
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
bigeasyweb.co.uk ?
There is no reason why an accessible site should cause blindness.
On 10/3/07, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, October 3, 2007 11:18 pm, Chris Wilson wrote:
I think my point is being missed entirely. I completely support
standards
and accesability
No, not madness. Instead, it would be a good way to bring art to
audiences that might not otherwise know it.
Yes, but once you start applying that logic inside legislated rules of
presentation and usage (which is the issue here, or will be), a site can no
longer be the art the artist desires.
As it happens, a Braille version of a publication is one of the least
useful things you can do. In the UK only 2% of registered blind people read
Braille.
How many web users are disabled to the point of using screen readers (anyone
using it by choice not by necessity doesn't count, that's their
Oh, this mailing list has been stagnant for quite some time, needs a good
argument if you ask me. :)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Those are all well and good, but utterly useless in a global marketplace.
Should I be under your countries guidelines? Mine? What if I'm
international? All of them? What if country As guidelines are incompatible
with country Bs... Or should legislation hinge on guidelines proposed,
created, and
Speaking of ' logical fallacy'
On 10/3/07, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are some of the worst analogies I've ever seen. The target
website is not a work of art, it's not a mountain, it's not a car,
it's not a drive up ATM, it's not a building.
Not to mention the slippery
That's the same short sighted question asked when WYSIWYG editors were
introduced. If something like this is making you fear for your career, you
really need to reevaluate if you are even in the right feild let alone
career.
***
17 matches
Mail list logo
