of your clients
work and perhaps you'll have great success as an author and we can all read
and learn, as I've previously mentioned, we're all students of the Web.
Regards,
Edward Clarke
www.ebizconsultancy.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
from seasoned coders here, after all, it's
something you'll be expecting your readership to do ;) WSG is a very
productive list for students of standards so you're definitely in the right
place.
I wish your magazine every success.
Regards,
Edward Clarke
www.ebizconsultancy.co.uk
-Original
Andrew,
I'm not sure who those questions were aimed at but does the medium matter if
the information is the same? It's the validity of the content that's at
question here.
Regards,
Edward Clarke
www.ebizconsultancy.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Google is the preferred search engine of use for the majority of users of
assistive devices due to its clear and simple layout; another example of the
'religion of the perfection of writing to W3C standards' not always required
to deliver accessibility and usability.
Edward Clarke
ECommerce
regional list members are around
but a heads up would be good.
Offline mails welcome to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edward Clarke
ECommerce and Software Consultant
TN38 Consulting
http://www.tn38.net
http://blog.tn38.net
Creative Media Centre
17-19 Robertson Street
Hastings
East Sussex
TN34 1HL
There's an article for accessible popups over at
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/popuplinks/
The code you posted has some issues that will need to be dealt with.
thanks for the citehelp/cite with my last question. now i have a
page with javascript opening a new window from a link.
Yes! You're using :hover on the list item not the hyperlink. Remember,
you're coding for IE. Run the hyperlink as display:block and hover that to
give consistent results. IE has no support for :hover on anything other than
the a tag.
having some probs with getting simple css rollovers to
Without trying to drag this on Ben, I still fail to see the purpose of using
the B tag over the SPAN tag and don't genuinely believe I'm declaring my own
preference as a standard. If backward compatibility is the only argument
then it only goes slightly further back than SPAN so the weight of that
On Aug 17, 2005, at 8:31 PM, T. R. Valentine wrote:
On 17/08/05, Scott Swabey (Lafinboy Productions)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does a calendar (single month) qualify as tabular data,
are ordered lists a better fit, or should I be looking at
another option?
IMO, a calendar is always
You are correct, it hasn't been 'officially' deprecated but as visual tags
and not logical ones; CSS offers a better long term solution.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527/elements.html seems to agree.
Regarding books, if you carry extra [per book] information in the context of
the
the same side
on this issue. Edward also points out:
On Aug 16, 2005, at 11:51 PM, Edward Clarke wrote:
You are correct, it hasn't been 'officially' deprecated but as
visual tags
and not logical ones; CSS offers a better long term solution.
When there are only semantically inappropriate tags
The problem is youre
designing for a technology [DSL],
not accessibility. May I suggest a handheld stylesheet to alleviate some of the
problem with a large media screen footprint?
Edward Clarke
ECommerce and Software
Consultant
TN38 Consulting
http://blog.tn38.net
I suspect the 120Kb footprint of the background image
is of more concern to most visitors.
Edward Clarke
ECommerce and Software Consultant
TN38 Consulting
http://blog.tn38.net
Creative Media Centre
17-19
Robertson Street
Hastings
East Sussex
TN34 1HL
United
Theres nothing
wrong with any of the server side scripting languages if you build the client
side output yourself.
Edward Clarke
ECommerce and Software
Consultant
TN38 Consulting
http://blog.tn38.net
Creative Media Centre
17-19 Robertson Street
Hastings
East Sussex
Re: http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html
I think a nice Georgia font would go down well
with that template.
Edward Clarke
ECommerce and Software Consultant
TN38 Consulting
http://blog.tn38.net
Creative Media Centre
17-19 Robertson Street
Hastings
East Sussex
If you mean what
does body{display:none;} do for SEO? then the answer is not very much.
Taking Googlebot and
Slurp as examples, they dont parse CSS or script, they want content
within the HTML and thats it. Most hidden elements, i.e. white text on
white background or display: none; for
It's an IE bug/feature. A nuisance I have to admit. The BASE tag though???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mike Foskett
Sent: 20 July 2005 10:29
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Base tag and the selecting of body text in IE
Not a name exactly but youre entitled to make one up if you
wish. Ive had this problem before but a while back.
Try:
base href="" instead of base
href="" /
and see how you go.
Eddie
http://blog.tn38.net/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I would like to assume
that if anyone fell for that, someone would give them a slap. ;)
Edward Clarke
ECommerce and Software
Consultant
TN38 Consulting
http://blog.tn38.net
Creative Media Centre
17-19 Robertson Street
Hastings
East Sussex
TN34 1HL
United Kingdom
Mark's site is useful too.
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/
Eddie.
http://blog.tn38.net/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chris Kennon
Sent: 18 July 2005 19:29
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Learning The DOM
Hi,
As many of
20 matches
Mail list logo
