/caption
thead
tr
th scope=colA1/th
/tr
/thead
tbody
tr
tdB1/td
/tr
tr
th scope=colC1/th
/tr
tr
tdD1/td
/tr
/tbody
/table
In this example, what's the scope/context of D1? Is it header C1? Or a A1+C1?
Hope this makes sense, thanks
Jamie Mason : Design
Skybet.com http://www.skysports.com
in place of C1, or is it's header read as being A1+C1.
Sorry if I'm confusing everyone, there's been a couple of times this has cropped up though.
Thanks for your time,
Jamie Mason
http://www.skybet.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
,
Jamie Mason
Skybet.com
-Original Message-
From: Terrence Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 December 2005 21:22
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Best Web Standards thing I learnt in 2005.
The best web standards thing I learnt in 2005 is:
How to best use the summary
: Webwide (previously
called ' Webwise' ) that was launched in 2004 which helps
makes pages easier to read
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/accessibility/win/language/learning/symbol.shtml
Jamie Mason: Design
// Skybet.com http://www.skysports.com/ , Central House, Beckwith Knowle, Otley Road
Title: RE: [WSG] Altering a Valid (X)HTML with DHTML = Is it still REAL LY valid?
Fantastic, thanks a lot Ben that makes a lot of sense.
Best Regards,
Jamie Mason
Skybet.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Curtis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2005 17:57
To: wsg
,
Jamie Mason
www.skybet.com
-Original Message-
From: Townson, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2005 11:24
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG] UDM navigation issues with standards and validity
I need some information on UDM (http://www.udm4.com
Title: RE: [WSG] Altering a Valid (X)HTML with DHTML = Is it still REAL LY valid?
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for your feedback so far, I'm going to wait for Pat Lauke's full feedback before I respond, unless that recent one was it?
Regards,
Jamie Mason
Skybet.com
-Original Message
, I'm still young and learning :) ) don't use _javascript_ so *should* be ok right? Which groups of users would be affected by this?
Respectfully, and thanks in advance.
Jamie Mason
Skybet.com
http://www.blatek.co.uk/blateksatay/
I quite like it,
what do you think?
this because users just run the file and they're away, but I'm cringing in the same way you probably are when reading..it all feels a bit shady doesn't it?
What do you think?
Jamie Mason: Design
// Skysports.com http://www.skysports.com/ , Central House, Beckwith Knowle, Otley Road, Harrogate, HG3
Title: RE: [WSG] Browser hijacking for usability
Hi All,
Agreed! *throws idea towards the bin*
Cheers!
Jamie
Title: absolute positioning, objects inputs
http://www.engineerrecords.com/abspos.htm
This page is a quick example, it's got form inputs and a flash file with nothing done to them, then OVER THE TOP of that, is a blue absolutely positioned div.
In IE - The select appears above the div
In
(not the example above) I need _javascript_ to dynamically set it's x,y,width and height, but the above will fix it.
I read that for flash in mozilla you have to set wmode=transparent.
Jamie Mason
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Mason
Sent: 07 June 2005 10:05
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject
, the links are in the same size as the body text, wouldn't a high contrast link need to be massive and bold? There's no WAY anyone can do that on a high profile site, surely?
What to do? Any help and ideas would be great, thanks in advance,
Jamie Mason
Ps- I've seen http://www.alistapart.com/articles
Title: Text input can't be selected in IE (html+css)
Hi,
I have a problem that's got me totally confused, I have a login and a password input in the header of my design.
There's no _javascript_ involved at all, you can't seem to select the inputs, what I have noticed though is that if you
, but removing the styles for
that area has got the inputs working again.
From: Jamie Mason
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 May 2005
15:09To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'Subject: [WSG] Text
input can't be selected in IE (html+css)Importance:
High
Hi, I have a problem that's got me
totally confused, I
Title: RE: [WSG] Headings within ul Navigation
Thanks all,
I've been doing it purely for strucural reasons rather than presentational.
The thought behind it was (all invented in my head);
+ hey, maybe it'll help give some more things for search engines to grab onto
+ maybe screen reader
lih2Item/h2/li
/ul
Is the above right or wrong? I'm doing this at the moment, thinking it's helping give semantic meaning to the page, but is it right?
Thanks in advance,
Jamie Mason
Title: RE: [WSG] Client wants flashing text
2 important points before I start...
1. Don't get me wrong, I don't want flashing text!
2. Don't get me wrong, I don't want flashing text!
But...does anyone know about text-decoration:blink; and accessibility? It sounds a stain on the pristine
Title: IE7 isn't going to CSS2
http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2005/03/the-reason/
Apologies if this has been posted already
, but yes it should be there :-p
If a blog Tutorial does come of this, could whoever writes it (or spots it) drop me a quick email?
Thanks again, greatly appreciated.
Jamie Mason
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 March 2005 00:46
Title: RE: [WSG] Acronym within th Screen Readers
ack, annoyingly you don't get a tooltip in ie for abbr, but do for acronym.
From: Jamie Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 March 2005 09:27
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG
!
Jamie Mason
Title: RE: [WSG] Site Review - CAR SELLER PORTAL
We proud to be the first car seller world wide portal to use XHTML and Webstandards
...I'd wait until AFTER your page validates before saying things like that, and check! (http://www.autotrader.co.uk)
Your fieldsets are also missing legends
, but you would reconsider you comments, and read more before take an opinion.
by the way, the website is already validated.
best regards,
Genau L. Jr
http://www.meucarronovo.com.br
Jamie Mason wrote:
We proud to be the first car seller world wide portal to use XHTML
and Webstandards
looks good, it lets you submit empty forms though, use something
like;
if (strlen($whatever) 1) {computer says
no};
or
if
(!$whatever) {computer says no};
Jamie
From: Gizax Studios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2005 15:35To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: [WSG] Gnews
Title: Colour Mixer
Crikey, this is a bit special;
http://colormixers.com/mixers/cmr/
to clear some floats to get the background to collect a div area. Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance all,
Jamie Mason
Title: RE: clear:both vs br clear=all
ha! Cancel this, I just fixed it...
FYI
br class=clr /
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Mason
Sent: 24 February 2005 11:35
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: clear:both vs br clear=all
In Firefox, this;
HTML
div class=clrnbsp;/div
Title: Common Coding Problems with HTML and CSS
An absolutely fantastic article, incredibly handy.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/common.html
If you've seen it before, great ( don't reply ;) )
Title: RE: [WSG] Table content displayed as a list
I'd say that if it's a list, then format it as a list as using CSS to bastardise your document seems to defeat the object. If it's dynamic, can you not just output the data into a list instead?
-Original Message-
From: RMW Web
Title: RE: [WSG] Standards and site structuring
This is already in development with WebML, as far as I know the project has re started.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faaberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 February 2005 04:12
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG]
Title: RE: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question
Thanks all, I thought 2 was the way to be doing it, I'm sure I'd read on the W3C though that they had to be used to structure an ordered numerical hierarchy, but I can't imagine many practical examples where you might do this.
Thanks again,
Title: Quick h1,h2 etc question
Hi,
I'm sure this has been asked time and time again and is probably a daft question, but which is the proper way to use header tags? Thanks in advance for your patience and help!
Jamie
Is it...
=
1) All headers must be used in order
Title: Quick h1,h2 etc question
Hi,
I'm sure this has been asked time and time again and is probably a daft question, but which is the proper way to use header tags? Thanks in advance for your patience and help!
Jamie
Is it...
=
1) All headers must be used in order
and option, have I missed something, or is it just not supported?
Vaguely the code is as below
select
optgroup label=
option/option
option/option
option/option
/optgroup
optgroup label=
option/option
option/option
option/option
/optgroup
/select
Thanks a lot.
Jamie Mason
Title: Message
I heard about this on a radio campaign they're running ahead of
the new laws on accessibility and disabled rights in general in the
UK;
http://www.drc-gb.org
Jamie Mason: Design// Skysports.com, Central House,
Beckwith Knowle, Otley Road, Harrogate, HG3 1UF
T: (01423) 700849
Title: RE: [WSG] Updated Web Accessibility Tool bar
Hi,
Does anyone know if there's a firefox equivalent?
Thanks,
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: russ - maxdesign [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 August 2004 05:36
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: [WSG] Updated Web
Title: RE: [WSG] Updated Web Accessibility Tool bar
Hi,
Cheers guys, I have that already, I just wondered if the ie toolbar had features this firefox one didn't, and a version was available for firefox.
Jamie Mason: Design
// Skysports.com, Central House, Beckwith Knowle, Otley Road
Title: RE: [WSG] Updated Web Accessibility Tool bar
Hi,
Does anyone know if there's a firefox equivalent?
Thanks,
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: russ - maxdesign [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 August 2004 05:36
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: [WSG] Updated Web
Title: RE: [WSG] Updated Web Accessibility Tool bar
Hi,
Cheers guys, I have that already, I just wondered if the ie toolbar had features this firefox one didn't, and a version was available for firefox.
Jamie Mason: Design
// Skysports.com, Central House, Beckwith Knowle, Otley Road
Title: RE: [WSG] Styling Text... (Andy Budd Accessibility Quiz)
If you don't have anything constructive to say, don't say anything at all
(please)
-Original Message-
From: Andy Budd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 3:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
-2496809?%5Fencoding=UTF8coliid=I9X2I1XIVUYYZcolid=3SPRHP4EVRUW0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I hope you like these also, andthanks again for
your
help.
Jamie Mason:
Design
T:
(01423) 700849
attachment: image001.gif
for strict?
Thanks a lot,
Jamie Mason: Design
T: (01423) 700849
Title: RE: [WSG] KHTML ??
*shakes head* I bet you guys are among the few that find Steve Martin films funny, right?
:)
Jamie Mason: Design
T: (01423) 700849
-Original Message-
From: t94xr.net.nz webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2004 10:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: [WSG] KHTML ??
This is where I ask you to go to google, right?
Jamie Mason: Design
T: (01423) 700849
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2004 15:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] KHTML ??
Jamie Mason wrote
questions.
Jamie Mason: Design
T: (01423) 700849
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type
Title: RE: [WSG] www.seoed.com - Please review
Hey,
This is really great, well done man! It looks all there to me usability and accessibility wise, I'll leave it to the bigger guns to find the nitty grittys with it.
I'm happy with it though! Take care.
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original
that made sense :/
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Nick Gleitzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 June 2004 16:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Action to force browser developers to clean up their act
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, at 01:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
What's the problem though captain?
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Martin Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 June 2004 16:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
Hi All
Anyone got any decent
Title: RE: [WSG] Make em' pay for IE
I agree word for word with Mark on this
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harwood WebMail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2004 12:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Make em' pay for IE
Im sorry but you
Title: RE: [WSG]
Hi,
Tables are for tabular data only, not for use for layouts as a positional grid. The only time tables should be used with CSS is to present tabular data in the content of a CSS laid out design.
Cheers,
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Chris Blown
perfectly possible to build that in CSS-P.
No offence meant,
Jamie Mason: Design
Title: Message
Hi,
You could
absolutely position the right hand column, put a right margin on the centre
column of the width of the right column and have that and the left column
fluid.
That would work,
right?
Apologies again
for my previous posts tone.
Jamie
Mason: Design
? I know
nothing about these and would really love a chance to be able to test my work on
these directly. Apologies for not knowing the correct pc term for categorising
these.
Thanks in
advance,
Jamie
Mason: Design
Title: Message
Hey
Pat,
Thanks a lot for
the advice, It's best then if I steer away from 'hands on' testing of Assistive
Technology and just follow the guidelines as is.
Thanks again, that
was a huge help.
Jamie
Mason: Design
-Original Message-From: P.H.Lauke
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: RE: [WSG] What's the value and of a Ruby?
I think he's asking what other othes it could have, other than those intended. I have no ideas at the moment.
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bentley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2004 08:23
Title: RE: [WSG] New suckerfish menus
Or as Mr Bell would say,
DING DONG!
Jamie Mason: Design
(Ps- oh no...what have I done?)
-Original Message-
From: Neerav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2004 07:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] New suckerfish menus
Title: RE: [WSG] height problem
I joined yesterday and ditto :)
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faaberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 May 2004 10:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] height problem
On 5/20/04 2:30 AM Kim Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: [WSG] 'It Works in Gecko Browsers ...'
I feel that Mozilla is by a country mile the best browser available, but the guy you're replying to there is right in my opinion. The average web user doesn't comfortably adapt to new environments all that well.
Jamie Mason: Design
60 matches
Mail list logo
