to
display/experience the content.
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
aligned, and text in the opposite spaces. It would be
easy using tables - but I want to be able to use CSS for it. And
everything I try seems to end up in a bigger muddle!
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
. using em was way to inconsistent cross browser.The text
under the search box is the size my designer wants it to be.
http://www.sgi.com/tempie/search_font.html
.box {font-size: 9px;}
Thank you,
Janelle
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
as
intended! Welcome to inner sanctum of web development.
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0 3% 2em 0;
}
.content img,
.content h1{
clear: both;
}
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
labelled as part of the label's
definition aren't the semantics of an implicit label just a little bit
dubious (even if it does meet the DTD)?
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org
/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
Peeke (XERT) wrote:
Just wondering whether there was a way to include different body
background colors (for different pages) within the same css file.
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
**
The discussion list for http
and default rendering of unstyled elements will vary.
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
of the elements - how do you know, by default,
how many characters should be visible to the user in a text field, for
instance? So there is a distinction, which I think is sufficient, but
there's a distinctly slippery slope near at hand!
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
Also some issues with the navigation sliding of the plate in Safari
It's true of, presumably, all browsers because your menus are absolutely
positioned.
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list
absolutely relative to
the page, but the other content of the page was being centred.
Presumably on a 1024x768 the menu positioning looked right.
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list for http
Seems to work fine in IE5.01/Win on XP SP2.
Cheers
Peter
Maxine Sherrin wrote:
I need to find out if multiple class names, like this:
Were supported in older browsers, in particular IE5 and IE5.5.
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
Lynx, for example). If the cols are not defined in
the markup then what is the browser supposed to show?
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
, that your example page contains multiple elements sharing
the same ID. IDs must be unique for a given page.
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
Hi Devendra
Devendra Shrikhande wrote:
What is the advantage of the fact that IDs must be unique on a page? I am aware of the circumstance that if you need to repeat an ID, set is as a class, but have still not figured out the advantage of an ID.
This is an important topic. At first glance, it
.
Cheers
Peter
--
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Hi Darren
Your #container margin-right is -250 but this doesn't allow enough for
the width and padding of your #sidebar (200px + 40px). With a
margin-right of -250px you will only be able to have padding of 12px on
each side of the sidebar. Increasing the margin-right to -280px will
solve the
://www.wasabicube.com
Peter Asquith wrote:
Hi Darren
Your #container margin-right is -250 but this doesn't allow enough for
the width and padding of your #sidebar (200px + 40px). With a
margin-right of -250px you will only be able to have padding of 12px on
each side of the sidebar. Increasing
Hi Matt
The approach I've used in the past is very similar to Dan Cederholm's
Faux Columns approach (http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns).
In this approach, where you know the width of the element that you want
to shadow but don't know the height, you simply create a 1px high
Hi Ted
Validating the source sorts out the problem. There's a missing img end
tag, several that need to be amp; and some type=text/javascript
missing from script elements. Adding those fixes the strange behaviour.
Interestingly, the source as it stands causes IE to break if you try
resizing
Jay Hills wrote:
You can use Mozilla/Firefox/Opera to see what I mean at
http://www.ikonik.net/2/. It works in Internet Explorer but the tabs
'flicker'. Is this a problem with the Z-index in IE or have I done something
else wrong with my CSS? link: http://www.ikonik.net/2/css/visual.css.
Hi Jay
the back-end to Cocoon, but I was hoping
they'd grasp the web standards nettle and revamp the markup as well.
Cheers
Peter
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters
Darren Wood wrote:
Thats my exact point.
My apologies, I missed it!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be
It is, in my experience, best to start with the closest implementation
to the standards you can find (in this case I choose Firefox/Gecko) and
then code for the exceptional cases. If you start from an outlying
position (for example IE 5/Win) and then try to work the other way you
will find
Firefox - it just feels right!
Cheers
Peter
---
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm putting together a list of web development tools and am wondering about
the following:
Why is the Firefox browser used by Web Developers? What does it have that
makes it a good
the attribute on a case by case
basis. Does anybody know if there are workarounds for this or is this
just one of those things?
Cheers
Peter
---
Peter Asquith
http://www.wasabicube.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
Kay Smoljak wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:44:35 +1000, Craig Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this has been posted yet - but for those that don't know,
FireFox 0.9 is now officially out.
Make sure you completely uninstall any previous versions first - and
some people are
30 matches
Mail list logo