contact either;
1. Lee Middleton, Head of Sales and Marketing, on l...@silverstripe.com
on +64 27 288 9909
2. Sam Minnee, Acting CEO, on s...@silverstripe.com or +64 21 411 311
Cheers,
Sigurd Magnusson
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile (US
contact either;
1. Lee Middleton, Head of Sales and Marketing, on l...@silverstripe.com
on +64 27 288 9909
2. Sam Minnee, Acting CEO, on s...@silverstripe.com or +64 21 411 311
Cheers,
Sigurd Magnusson
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile (US
Thanks for emailing me. I'm out of the office on annual leave over
Christmas, returning to work on Monday 10 January 2011.
Cheers,
Sigurd.
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile: +64 21 42 12 08
Skype: sigurdmagnusson
twitter.com
Thanks for emailing me. I'm out of the office on annual leave over
Christmas, returning to work on Monday 10 January 2011.
Cheers,
Sigurd.
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile: +64 21 42 12 08
Skype: sigurdmagnusson
twitter.com
Thanks for emailing me. I'm out of the office on annual leave over
Christmas, returning to work on Monday 10 January 2011.
Cheers,
Sigurd.
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile: +64 21 42 12 08
Skype: sigurdmagnusson
twitter.com
Thanks for emailing me. I'm out of the office on annual leave over
Christmas, returning to work on Monday 10 January 2011.
Cheers,
Sigurd.
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile: +64 21 42 12 08
Skype: sigurdmagnusson
twitter.com
Thanks for emailing me. I'm out the office on annual leave, returning
to work Monday morning.
You may contact Lee Middleton on l...@silverstripe.com in my absence.
Cheers,
Sigurd.
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile: +64 21 42 12 08
Skype
Thanks for emailing me. I'm out the office today due to sick leave.
You may contact Lee Middleton on l...@silverstripe.com in my absence.
Cheers,
Sigurd
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Mobile: +64 21 42 12 08
Skype: sigurdmagnusson
Thanks for emailing me.
I'm out the office Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. Please phone me on
+64 21 42 12 08 if urgent, otherwise your patience is appreciated
while my access to email is limited.
You may also contact l...@silverstripe.com in my absence.
Cheers,
Sigurd
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Thanks for emailing me.
I'm largely out the office Friday, Monday, and Tuesday (27-31 August).
Please phone me on +64 21 42 12 08 if urgent, otherwise your patience
is appreciated while my access to email is limited.
Cheers,
Sigurd
--
Sigurd Magnusson
Business Relationship Manager
SilverStripe
Most websites we build at SilverStripe have IE 6.0 as a minimum, and
even then, we're unpatiently anticipating the time when we can drop IE
6.
FireFox (2), Safari (3), Chrome (latest) users are more encouraged to
keep up to the latest versions, and have more aggressive update
mechanisms,
Can people offer examples of school websites that lead the way, for
instance in terms of;
- interaction between student/parent/school/community
- allows students to show off work
- allows students/teachers/parents/community to engage (e.g. see
sports results, look up when next school theatre
is possible, though.
---
Sigurd Magnusson
SilverStripe
--
SilverStripe is the 2008 most promising open source CMS platform!
http://packtpub.com/article/2008-most-promising-open-source-cms-announced
--
DDI: +64 4 978 7332
Skype: sigurdmagnusson
twitter.com/SigurdMagnusson
extra amount.
For instance, this MSN one contains intuitive elements but is
cluttered with too much instruction.
https://accountservices.passport.net/reg.srf?roid=2sl=1vv=400lc=1033
Sigurd Magnusson,
SilverStripe
***
List
We've been collaborating with Google on an extension to their successful
Google Summer of Code program, producing the Google Highly Open
Participation Contest. Aimed to illustrate to our next generation in the
industry on the virtues of collaboration, open standards, and freedom of
We've been collaborating with Google on an extension to their successful
Google Summer of Code program, producing the Google Highly Open
Participation Contest. Aimed to illustrate to our next generation in the
industry on the virtues of collaboration, open standards, and freedom of
ges
still seem to appear.
In addition, the "view style information" (under CSS) is greyed out,
very annoying.
Sigurd Magnu
Webstock in May 2006 is hosted at a capital city--Wellington--and you
guys probably treat NZ as a state :P
Its going to be absolutely amazing -- Check out http://www.Webstock.org.nz
Siggy
--
Cade Whitbourn wrote:
I know it's early but...
Anybody know of any good training courses or
I was wondering if anyone knew of a popular sites to promote semanitc or
compliant (or good in general) websites?
Furthermore, if there was a site or an award that would be considered
quite an achievement or endorsement for your work?
I have submitted several items to www.w3cSites.com, however
This needs to be rewritten as:
http://www.choice.com.au/defaultView.aspx?id=102314amp;catId=100165
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a page in the site I am working on
(http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/sbi240/module3/agriculture.html) that
won't validate because of an external link I have to the
I always thought a form was not able to be placed in a form. Can you
explain what you're attempting to do? Are you sure you're not just
wanting to have two submit buttons within the one form?
Charla wrote:
Hi
Does anybody know how to sumbit the inner form, if you have a form
within a form on
We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz,
so that we can gather a final set of feedback and changes for a Monday
meeting to see the project finished next week.
The entire site is XHTML 1.1, CSS2, WCAG-AAA compliant, and makes good
use of semantic markup, e.g. no
...the date in particular
Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 4/7/05 12:53 AM "Sigurd Magnusson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz,
so that we can gather a final set of feedback and changes for a Monday
me
not sure what sort of 'standards' I should use to test
against to have a website that operates well with a mobile device; are
their good emulators or techniques to improve the site beyond what it
currently is like?
Sig
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
We just 'soft launched' a new website,
http
It could be argued that it is more than
presentation. It indicates to the user about the quantity or usage of the
textarea; the size of text fields is a usability topic. If you were told to
write a "Summary of your proposal", and given 8 lines instead of 2 lines, you
would probably write a
: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] textarea rows cols - presentation in xhtml?
At 03:00 PM 4/4/2005, Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
It could be argued that it is more than presentation. It indicates to the
user about the quantity or usage of the textarea; the size of text fields
Sure
I've never heard myself of using DL/DT/DD for this sort of thing, although
instinctively it seems quite an appropriate use.
My question relates to what sort of problems you have encountered with
widths; I would have thought the following would pose no problems:
dl class=captionedimage
Gah - we're well underway on a an XHTML 1.1 compliant site, and we've
eventually found that we need to do an IE hack--a real shame since
everything else was going so well. Can anyone see if there's a simple
mistake we've done, or if it is indeed a bug with IE which necessitates a
hack.
The
http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/miscellaneous-symbols.html
All symbols of version 2.1 are shown in standard-browsers.
Actually, while when I loaded this up (in FireFox), I was happily surprised
that all symbols showed, I noticed that IE6 showed WAY less than half of
them... perhaps
or setup you
have in the operating system???
Siggy
- Original Message -
From: Sigurd Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Style part of form field
http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/miscellaneous
Untitled DocumentHi all,
A little off-topic, but after a look around the internet I've come up blank:
I'm trying to lump the popularity of websites into groups based on the total
number of page views per month, and also learn the peak rate of page views
per hour.
E.g. a standard banking website
Well if you put a border on the span you see that the image is in the wrong
place within the span;
Doing background-position: bottom right; within the ul#subnav li.last
span { certainly gets you most the way there; had you done that?
Siggy
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brown [EMAIL
: Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Rounded corner and IE Win help needed
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Well if you put a border on the span you see that the image is in the
wrong place within the span;
Doing background
Untitled DocumentUpgrade your browsers ;)
The new version simply resolves a couple of security vulnerabilities:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html
Siggy
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Looking at the W3C for XHTML 1.1;
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_listmodule
It says that LI and DDs both are part of the Flow content model, which is
the same as DIV, so this looks to confirm what my feeling was... they can
contain any nested element, including
Thanks for all your feedback;
Steve Bryant: Cheers. The second approach is pretty code-heavy, so I would
probably make the verbose style
onblur=checkvalidation('required=true,validation=numeric') and possibly run
the onblur event on all forms at the submission, or something like that.
Gez; So
Hi,
Just a comment on layout;
When I went to the website, I immediately took an interest in the package
and wanted to go to a download page, but I actually had difficulty locating
it, which then raised my suspicions that it was still under development,
especially when I went to 'Status' menu
I get the same response, so would seem to be a bug; perhaps submit a bug
report to w3c? (Our company has sent in a bug report for the w3c xhtml 1.1
validator the other week, so don't treat it as absolutely perfect!!)
Siggy
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Stefanenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Rule: 12.4.1 - Identify all non-hidden INPUT elements that do not have an
explicit LABEL association.
Failure - INPUT Element, of Type TEXT, at Line: 109, Column: 30 in FORM
Element at Line: 108, Column: 2
I could put the label around the image button, or have a blank
?
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Rule: 12.4.1 - Identify all non-hidden INPUT elements that do not have an
explicit LABEL association.
Failure - INPUT Element, of Type TEXT, at Line: 109, Column: 30 in FORM
Element at Line: 108, Column: 2
I could put the label around the image button, or have a blank
This is a split technical/marketing dilemma for people to ponder...
Over the past few years, we have built up a library of rather useful
Javascript libraries that we thought were a very elegant solution for adding
behaviour to menu systems and forms. These have been used on dozens of
websites,
I noticed that
WCAG-AA needs a label "for" any text fields in a form. Makes sense, but
...In the case where you have a text field like (where the button is an
image):[] [Sign Up To Newsletter] or
[] [Search]These are common as a global form on all
pages. There is no
Untitled DocumentI am wanting to get some inline javascript to validate to
xhtml1.1, which can be done via cdata regions. What's browser support for
these like? Is this another area of brainnumbing hacks and problems?
Siggy
script type=text/javascript ![CDATA[Lots of juicy
symbols.]]/script
Wow. Some serious bedtime reading. Cheers.
Siggy
- Original Message -
From: russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Web Standards Group wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Asterisks in W3C spec
Here are some:
Joe Clark's serialised book
Don't know the maximum number of pixels a page can have; it very likely
depends on the user agent. I would have thought the most robust way is to
have a fluid design; which led me to an idea--having a fluid design only in
the print media type :P I wonder if anyone's done that??
Or you could
I keep seeing asterisks in the W3C spec but cannot see a glossary anywhere.
As an example, with the img element in xhtml 1.1, the attributes 'src' and
'alt' are both marked with an asterisk. Why?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_imagemodule
(I realise img is
#1 - not sure
#2 If you want to apply something to every li within #header, use #header
li { ... }
Regarding #3, nesting your menus will create a clearer heirachy;
e.g. change
ul
lih2Sub Heading 3/h2/li
lia href=/Category 1/a/li
lia href=/Category 2/a/li
lia href=/Category 3/a/li
lia
Untitled DocumentA list of items containing titles, summaries and more links
is fairly common; both for news articles, and products ('buy now '.).
In my opinion, a 'more' link is good accessibility for most users... You
read a snippet of an interesting news article, and therefore your eye is at
Untitled DocumentIn an effort to make our company's code XHTML 1.1 compliant
and more semantic (we were loosely following XHTML 1.0 Trans but now want to
more ridigly follow it), I was brainstorming for conventions and best
practices. I came up with an idea pertaining to general lists that I'd
The change to the heirarchy above is great, but it doesn't help the
#header, #mainnav
and #subnav lists because there isn't a heading for these. If you look at
the page with styles
disabled you'll see what I mean.
I think what you and I are both really waiting for is XHTML2; except we need
to
50 matches
Mail list logo